The Ideal LiST Session Frequency Protocol for CPPS Treatment

February 11, 2021 updated by: Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece

Comparing 2 Frequency Protocols of Low-intensity Shockwave Therapy for Non-bacterial Chronic Prostatitis Type IIIb /Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: a Randomised Clinical Trial

The study will include 50 chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) patients who will be randomised in 2 groups.

Group A (25 patients )will receive 6 LiST sessions with a frequency 1 session / week.

Group B (25 patients) will receive 6 LiST sessions with a frequency 2 sessions / week.

National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index(NHI-CPSI), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-ED) questionnaires will be answered before and at 1 and 3 month follow up visit.

Adverse events will be reported during the treatment and follow up period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54621
        • G.Gennimatas Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant must 18 to 60 years of age.
  2. Participant has signed and dated the appropriate Informed Consent document.
  3. Participant has had a clinical diagnosis of CP/CPPS defined as symptoms of discomfort or pain in the perineal or pelvic region for at least a three (3) month period within the last six (6) months

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has evidence of facultative Gram negative or enterococcus with a value of ≥ 1000 CFU/ml in mid-stream urine (VB2).
  2. Participant has a history of prostate, bladder or urethral cancer.
  3. Participant has undergone pelvic radiation or systemic chemotherapy.
  4. Participant has undergone intravesical chemotherapy.
  5. Participant has unilateral orchialgia without pelvic symptoms, active urethral stricture or bladder stones, or any other urological condition associated with LUTS, any neurological disease or disorder affecting the bladder.
  6. Participant has undergone prostate surgery or treatment.
  7. Participant with penile or urinary sphincter implants.
  8. Participant has been diagnosed with cancer during the last 5 years, or had any surgery in the pelvis.
  9. Participant has a neurological impairment or psychiatric disorder preventing his understanding of consent and his ability to comply with the protocol.
  10. PSA>3 and age > 40 years
  11. Positive (suspicious for malignancy) digital rectal examination (DRE).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
Patients will receive 6 Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) sessions (1/week) by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (energy level 7)
LiST will be applied in the perineum of the patients by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (5000shockwaves per session, energy level 7)
Active Comparator: Group B
Patients will receive 6 Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) sessions (2/week) by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (energy level 7)
LiST will be applied in the perineum of the patients by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (5000shockwaves per session, energy level 7)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1.The difference between groups in the change of the pain domain of NIH-CPSI score
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment
CP/CPPS-related complaints will be assessed by the the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The questionnaire designed to provide symptom scores for patients with chronic prostatitis. The index provides scores on pain (items 1-4), urinary symptoms (items 5-6), and quality of life (items 7-9).Total score ranges from 0 to 35 (higher values represent worse outcome).The index provides a special pain domain (items 1-4) and the score for this domain ranges from 0 to 21.
from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference between groups in the change of total NIH-CPSI score (Q1-9)
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
CP/CPPS-related complaints will be assessed by the the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The questionnaire designed to provide symptom scores for patients with chronic prostatitis. The index provides scores on pain (items 1-4), urinary symptoms (items 5-6), and quality of life (items 7-9).Total score ranges from 0 to 35 (higher values represent worse outcome)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
The difference between groups in the change of urinary symptoms (Q 5-6) and quality of life domains (Q 7-9) of the NIH-CPSI score
Time Frame: from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
CP/CPPS-related complaints will be assessed by the the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The questionnaire designed to provide symptom scores for patients with chronic prostatitis. The index provides scores on pain (items 1-4), urinary symptoms (items 5-6), and quality of life (items 7-9).Total score ranges from 0 to 35 (higher values represent worse outcome).The index provides a special urinary symptom domain (items 5-6) and the score for this domain ranges from 0 to 10
from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
The difference between groups in the change of IIEF-ED score
Time Frame: from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
It will be assessed by International Index of Erectile Function -Erectile Domain (IEF-ED) score. A questionnaire designed to evaluate erectile capabilities. The questionnaire provides a score between 5 and 30.The severity categories are: 1-10 severe ED, 10-16 moderate ED, 17-21 moderate to mild ED, 22-25 mild ED, 26-30 no ED
from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
The difference between groups in the change of IPSS
Time Frame: from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
They will be assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). A questionnaire designed to provide information on lower urinary tract symptoms and their impact on quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 35. The severity categories are: 1-7 mild, 8-19 moderate, 20-35 severe
from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment
The difference between groups in the the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at week 3, 4, 5,
It will be assessed by the pain VAS, right after each LIST session. Pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity . It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale]. To avoid clustering of scores around a preferred numeric value, numbers or verbal descriptors at intermediate points are not recommended. The following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75- 100 mm)
at week 3, 4, 5,
Adverse events rate in all patients
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Potential treatment related adverse events after the first LIST session and during the 3 month follow up period will be reported
18 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Professor, Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Thessaloniki, Greece

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1410/2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Low intensity shockwave therapy

Subscribe