Mindfulness Based Emotion Regulation Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Rumination

September 30, 2020 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Analysis of the Neuronal Correlates of a Mindfulness Based Emotion Regulation Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Rumination Untersuchung Der Neuronalen Korrelate Eines Emotionsregulationstrainings Zur Behandlung Depressiven Grübelns

In this study the investigators are examining the neuronal processes of a mindfulness based emotion regulation training for reducing depressive rumination. The research of depressive rumination helps in the developement of new therapies for depressive disorders.

Goal of this project is to have a look at the coherences between stress, mindfulness resources, depressive rumination and their neuronal correlates. Therefore the investigators are collecting the data of 48 patients with a depressive diagnosis in a randomized intervention-study with a treatment as usual (TAU) waiting-control-list versus an active intervention group. An additional 48 healthy control subjects are planned to be measured.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In a randomized and (for gender and severity of depressive symptomatic) outbalanced design the investigators are examining the neuronal processes of a mindfulness based emotion regulation training (MBERT) for reducing depressive rumination in a cross-over design.

Therefore 48 patients with a depressive disorder get a MBERT that consists of one psychoeducative session and 8 therapy sessions.

For checking the efficacy of the MBERT each patient runs three times through the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). As the study design is a cross-over design, half of the patients get the MBERT in block 1 (i.e. between the first and the second TSST) and half of the patients get the MBERT in block 2 (i.e. between the second and the third TSST). In the block where they don't receive the MBERT the patients don't get any treatment within the scope of the study (waiting period), but any treatment as usual (TAU), including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, can be continued and started at each point of the study.

For analyzing the neuronal processes the investigators are measuring the cerebral oxygenation using functional near-infrared-spectroscopy (fNIRS) during the TSSTs as well as during the 8 therapy sessions.

Using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA), the investigators additionally are collecting data of the actual stress level, stressful events, rumination, equanimity, self-compassion, mindfulness and sleep quality two times a day. Thus the investigators can (1) observe the individual reaction to stress in the daily life, and (2) recheck if the patients are able to transfer the learned strategies from the MBERT in their daily life. For those patients that received the MBERT in the first block the investigators (3) additionally have data to evaluate the sustainability (i.e. the lasting effectivity) of the MBERT.

As a control condition, 48 healthy subjects will get a single TSST session.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age: 18-60
  • german as mother tongue
  • diagnosis of a unipolar depressive disorder
  • ruminative processes in the psychopathology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • acute or chronic disorder or medical treatment of such that might influence the cerebral metabolism:
  • Diabetes mellitus (E10-E14 in ICD-10)
  • Renal insufficiency apart from stadium 3 in Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative
  • non adjusted hypertonus (I10.x in ICD-10)
  • medium-severe or severe craniocerebral injury (GCS 3-12) / craniocerebral injury of 2. or 3. degree with loss of consciousness of > 30 minutes
  • any medication except oral contraceptives
  • other axis-I / axis-II disorders as main diagnosis
  • comorbid neurological disease
  • psychotic symptoms
  • acute suicidality & very severe depressive symptomatology (BDI-II Score > 40)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention group
Treatment with the mindfulness based emotion regulation therapy (MBERT) in block 1, no study-treatment in block 2 (but patients receive their possibly already started treatment as usual including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy).
  1. In each of 8 sessions (allocated over 4 weeks) the patient brings an (actual) topic that induces rumination. After identifying the underlying affect, the patients are instructed (1) to concentrate on it, (2) to accept and tolerate it (considering the personal situation and experiences), (3) to give it a new interpretation so the patient can look at it with a more generous view, and (4) to dissociate from it, so the patient can perceive it as one of many affects and as one that hasn't the power to influence one's thoughts and actions that much (as it does through rumination). These steps are gradually instructed and trained throughout 20 trials (à 40 seconds) in each session. After each trial there is room to talk about the trial, possible barriers and helpful strategies to overcome those. Between-sessions the patients are encouraged to train the strategies in their daily life and do some homework like a protocol of ruminative thoughts and meditation.
  2. Waiting period with TAU.
Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)
No study-treatment in block 1 (but patients receive their possibly already started treatment as usual including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy), treatment with the mindfulness based emotion regulation therapy (MBERT) in block 2.
  1. Waiting period with TAU.
  2. In each of 8 sessions (allocated over 4 weeks) the patient brings an (actual) topic that induces rumination. After identifying the underlying affect, the patients are instructed (1) to concentrate on it, (2) to accept and tolerate it (considering the personal situation and experiences), (3) to give it a new interpretation so the patient can look at it with a more generous view, and (4) to dissociate from it, so the patient can perceive it as one of many affects and as one that hasn't the power to influence one's thoughts and actions that much (as it does through rumination). These steps are gradually instructed and trained throughout 20 trials (à 40 seconds) in each session. After each trial there is room to talk about the trial, possible barriers and helpful strategies to overcome those. Between-sessions the patients are encouraged to train the strategies in their daily life and do some homework like a protocol of ruminative thoughts and meditation.
No Intervention: Control condition
Healthy subjects will get a single TSST session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-compassion-scale (SCS)
Time Frame: 8-10 weeks
Changes in self compassion through the mindfulness based emotion regulation therapy. Minimum value: 1; maximum value: 5; higher values mean better self compassion (i.e. a better outcome).
8-10 weeks
Becks Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: 8-10 weeks
Changes in depressive symptomatic through the mindfulness based emotion regulation therapy. Minimum value: 0; maximum value: 63; higher values mean more severe depressive symptoms (i.e. a worse outcome).
8-10 weeks
TSST
Time Frame: 3 times in 8-10 weeks
Changes in behavior while and immediately after the stress induction via the Trier Social Stresstest
3 times in 8-10 weeks
state rumination
Time Frame: 3 times in 8-10 weeks
Changes in state rumination while and immediately after the stress induction via the Trier Social Stresstest; increase from pre to post TSST
3 times in 8-10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
fNIRS TSST activation
Time Frame: 3 times in 8-10 weeks
Hemodynamic response / brain activation while control tasks and the stress induction via the Trier Social Stresstest
3 times in 8-10 weeks
fNIRS Training activation
Time Frame: 8 times in 4-5 weeks
Hemodynamic response / brain activation while the mindfulness based emotion regulation therapy / training sessions
8 times in 4-5 weeks
Training rating scores
Time Frame: 8 times in 4-5 weeks
Friendliness (with oneself and ones emotions) as well as emotional distancing while the mindfulness based emotion regulation therapy / training sessions via single questions after each trial. Ratings range from 0 to 9, while the higher the score the more the friendliness or the emotional distancing (i.e. higher scores mean a better outcome).
8 times in 4-5 weeks
Electronical momentary assessment (EMA)
Time Frame: 2 times per day in 8-10 weeks
Self compassion, rumination, mindfulness, subjective stress and sleep quality in the daily routine (recorded via momentary assessment). Therefore items from different questionnaires (Self compassion scale (SCS), Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), Perseverative Cognitions Questionnaire (PCQ)) and self created items were taken. For self compassion, rumination and mindfulness mean scores can be calculated afterwards (self compassion: min: 0, max: 100; rumination & mindfulness: min: 0, max: 5; for self compassion and mindfulness higher scores mean a better outcome, for rumination higher scores mean a worse outcome).
2 times per day in 8-10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ann-Christine Ehlis, Dr., submitter and head of the lab

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Other researchers can get IPD of interest after request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requester should have a scientistic (i.e. thematically related or complementary) interest in the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness based Emotion regulation therapy (MBERT) - Treatment as usual (TAU)

3
Subscribe