Percutaneous Pinning vs Orthosis and Early Mobilization (POEM)

March 6, 2024 updated by: Maria Wilcke, Karolinska Institutet

A Randomized Comparison Between Percutaneous Pinning and Non-surgical Management of Proximal Phalangeal Fractures

This study aims at investigating if splinting and early mobilization is a better method, regarding range of motion, for treating fractures of the base phalanx of the fingers compared to surgery with pinning. This will be achieved through a randomised clinical trial comparing the two methods.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand are very common and affect patients of all ages. . Most fractures heal without complications but these injuries can result in impaired hand function and prolonged inability to work and perform activities of daily living. If there is a dislocation that cannot easily be repositioned to a stable position, surgery might be required. Surgery is often performed with percutaneous pinning and immobilisation in plaster for 4 weeks. Good results of non-surgical treatment with a splint that allows immediate mobilization of the interphalangeal joints has been reported. This study will compare these two methods for treating fractures of the base phalanx of the fingers. Recruited patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms: 1. surgery with pinning 2. conservative treatment with a splint. Primary outcome is total active range of motion in the affected finger at 3, 6 months and 1 , 3 years. Secondary outcomes are number of sick days and various patient related outcome measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Dept Hand Surgery
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Fractures of the base phalanx of digit 2-5 in the hand.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture older than 2 weeks.
  • More than 25° of sagittal plane and/or 10° lateral angulation after reposition.
  • Intra-articular step >1mm.
  • Associated fractures in other bones (i e metacarpals, middle and distal phalanges) and/or tendon and nerve injuries in any finger.
  • Open fractures.
  • Patient age <18 years.
  • Inability to co-operate with the follow-up protocol (i.e. language difficulties, severe psychiatric disorder, cognitive impairment, drug addiction).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conservative treatment
Fracture treated with closed reduction, custom made orthosis and early mobilization.
Closed reduction, custom made orthosis and early mobilization
Active Comparator: Surgery
Fractures treated with closed reduction, percutaneous pinning (k-wires) and plaster.
Closed reduction, percutaneous pinning and plaster

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TAM (Total active range of motion)
Time Frame: 3 months
Total active range of motion measured in degrees of the affected finger.
3 months
TAM (Total active range of motion)
Time Frame: 6 months
Total active range of motion measured in degrees of the affected finger.
6 months
TAM (Total active range of motion)
Time Frame: 1 year
Total active range of motion measured in degrees of the affected finger.
1 year
TAM (Total active range of motion)
Time Frame: 3 years
Total active range of motion measured in degrees of the affected finger.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of sick days
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of sick days from the intervention until full return to work.
3 months
Patient related outcome measure DASH
Time Frame: 3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH). 0 points means no disability and 100 maximum disability.
3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Patient related outcome measure HADS
Time Frame: 3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The score is consists of one depression scale from 0 to 21, where 0 is no signs of depression and one anxiety scale from 0 to 21, where 0 means no anxiety.
3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Patient related outcome measure EQ-5D
Time Frame: 3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
EuroQols quality of life index. Consists of an index based on the questionnaire where 0 means death and 1 means full quality of life and one visual analog scale 0-100 where patients rate their health from bad (0) to excellent (100).
3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Patient related outcome measure HQ-8
Time Frame: 3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
HQ-8 is a questionnaire specifically for hand injuries. Each question gives a score 0-100, where 0 means no problems and 100 means worst imaginable problem.
3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Grips strength
Time Frame: 3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years
Measured in kilograms (JAMAR)
3, 6 months and 1 and 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Johanna von Kieseritzky, MD PhD, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Frakturstudien

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hand Injuries

Clinical Trials on Conservative treatment

3
Subscribe