Acceptance-based Intervention at Colorectal Cancer Patients (ABICOL)

October 1, 2020 updated by: George Theodoropoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Impact of Perioperative Acceptance-based Intervention on Early Psychological and Fanctional Recovery of Colorectal Cancer Patients

Taking into account the unavoidable effect of a major oncologic surgery commonly required for colorectal cancer patients and the recognized psychological and functional sequelae of the surgical treatment on their status, we will evaluate the influence of a psychological intervention, known as acceptance-based intervention, offered to those patients at the preoperative setting. Reduction of anxiety and assessmemt of indices of post-intervention psychological and functional recovery will be the primary goals of the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: Uncertainty, fears and anxiety are common reactions to an upcoming colectomy for colorectal cancer patients and are related not only to cancer disease, but also to the inevitable change in colon anatomy, affecting their preoperative psychological and functional condition and their postsurgical recovery.

Purpose: We aim to evaluate the psychological and functional recovery of colorectal cancer patients, who undergo colectomy, after an acceptance-based nursing intervention. The scope of this brief preoperative intervention is to enable patients to cope more efficiently with the upcoming surgery and their health status, as it is expected to reduce anxiety and have positive effect on postsurgical psychological and functional recovery.

Methods: The study includes histologically diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer, regardless of stage, who are scheduled to undergo colectomy. Patients will be divided into two groups-the experimental and the control group-by simple randomization. Both groups are going to complete a set of same questionnaires regarding quality of life, sleep, anxiety, depression and functional status. Patients in the control arm will then receive treatment-as-usual while patients in the experimental arm will also receive an acceptance-based intervention before surgery. Postoperatively, for both groups, apart from the self-reported symptoms, we will assess objective recovery factors, such as postoperative complications

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma
  • Age > 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastasis at time of diagnosis
  • Recurrence at time of diagnosis
  • History of other malignancies
  • Mental retardation
  • Deafness
  • Illiteracy
  • ASA score>3
  • Poor performance status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ABICOL
24 hours prior to surgery the patients undergo acceptance-based intervention, incorporating questions about their subjective perception about the surgery, the domains of their lives that have been affected, and on their own expectations from surgery and its effects on their lives. They will be asked to express their fears and worries about their condition and they will be discussed about the likelihood of experiencing postoperative pain.
24 hours prior to surgery the patients undergo acceptance-based intervention, incorporating questions about their subjective perception about the surgery, the domains of their lives that have been affected, and on their own expectations from surgery and its effects on their lives. They will be asked to express their fears and worries about their condition and they will be discussed about the likelihood of experiencing postoperative pain.
No Intervention: CONTROL
No acceptance-based intervention or other discussion related to the patients' fears and worries will be applied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain as measured by VAS score
Time Frame: Third postoperative day
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. The pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, which has been widely used in diverse adult populations.The most simple VAS is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).
Third postoperative day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional status as measured by "Maintain Function" Scale (MFS)
Time Frame: Third postoperative day
"Maintain function" scale is a validated 5-item summative. Each item begins with the stem, "How confidant are you that you know or can," and assesses an aspect of daily life-function, such as work and social activities. The responses are a 5-level Likert scale from 0 = "not at all confident" to 4 = "completely confident." We did not include a "not applicable" response option. The self-efficacy scores range between 0 and 20, with a higher score indicating better self-efficacy to maintain function.
Third postoperative day
Anxiety and depression measured by Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ)
Time Frame: Third postoperative day
The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) is a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. The Brief IPQ uses a single-item scale approach to assess perception on a 0-10 response scale. The Brief IBQ comprises 5 items on cognitive representation of illness perception: consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, and identity. There are 2 items on emotional representation: concern and emotions. One item is on illness comprehensibility. The last item is on perceived cause of illness, in which respondents list the three most important causal factors in their illness.
Third postoperative day
Anxiety and depression measured by State-Trait Anxiety (STAI) questionnaire
Time Frame: Third postoperative day
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic. Higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Third postoperative day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: George E Theodoropoulos, Associate Professor of Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 22, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sharing clinical trial data with other professional organizations and researchers will be important element to support best practice principles in our clinical trial.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

At completion of study and analysis of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

If requested for universal prospective registration If requested by journals for publication If requested by researchers running similar clinical trials

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on ACCEPTANCE-BASED INTERVENTION

3
Subscribe