Fostering Resilience to Psychosocial and HIV Risk in Indian MSM

October 22, 2019 updated by: Steven A. Safren, Massachusetts General Hospital
India has the world's third largest HIV epidemic and men who have sex with men (MSM) are an identified high risk group. MSM in India face unique psychosocial stress underlying the context of HIV risk. To maximize the potential impact of an HIV prevention intervention, the purpose of this study is to test, in a two-arm randomized controlled efficacy trial, a behavioral intervention that addresses both psychosocial / contextual stress and reducing participant's risk for HIV.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

India has the world's third largest HIV epidemic, and MSM in India have an estimated seroprevalence of 14.7%. Many HIV prevention efforts for MSM in India are limited to condom distribution and HIV education, with no existing efficacy trials of HIV prevention interventions and therefore no evidenced based HIV prevention interventions this population. MSM in India are hidden, stigmatized, and face considerable psychosocial stressors, including pressure to marry, which potentially increases the risk for HIV transmission to their wives.

This proposal is the culmination of our ongoing, successful > 10-year community based research collaboration with two NGOs dedicated to HIV prevention among MSM, Sahodaran (Chennai) and The Humsafar Trust (Mumbai), and investigators from the India Council of Medical Research (ICMR), National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (NIRT) in Chennai. Our work, including extensive community advisory input, has identified self-acceptance as a key resilience variable that protects against both HIV risk and psychosocial distress. A field test and pilot randomized controlled trial of our behavioral intervention that addresses both HIV risk and self-acceptance showed high participant acceptability and feasibility of study procedures, and success reducing HIV sexual risk behavior.

The current study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV, STI and sexual transmission risk compared to HIV/STI counseling and testing alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

608

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chennai, India
        • The National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis
      • Mumbai, India
        • The Humsafar Trust
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria - One of the following must be true:

  • Participant has had anal sex with 4 or more male partners (protected or unprotected) in the past 4 months.
  • Participant has had condomless anal sex with a man who was HIV unknown or serodiscordant in the past 4 months.
  • Participant has a history of transactional sex activity in the past 4 months.
  • Participant has been given a diagnosis of an STI in the past 4 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant does not identify as male
  • Younger than 18
  • Is unable to understand or consent to the procedures
  • Is deemed by the local PI or study staff to be engaging in deception about the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-acceptance behavioral intervention
The intervention will consist of individual and 4 group counseling sessions and 6 individual counseling sessions. The individual sessions are focused on specific individualized risk reduction plans, whereas the group sessions are focused on increasing self-acceptance and reducing HIV risk. Additionally, participants in this arm will receive HIV and STI counseling and testing.
The intervention will consist of HIV/STI counseling and testing as well as individual counseling sessions and group sessions. The primary focus of the group sessions are to help foster self-acceptance by the support from the group, as well as learn skills to reduce distress and HIV risk. The primary purpose of the individual sessions is to help develop and implement an individualized plan for HIV risk reduction, and, as needed and available, linkage to other services.
The counseling component is standard of care in India and will focus on HIV/STI risk and how to minimize risk. This is followed by biological testing for HIV and STIs.
Other: Comparison/Control
The comparison group will receive HIV and STI counseling and testing.
The counseling component is standard of care in India and will focus on HIV/STI risk and how to minimize risk. This is followed by biological testing for HIV and STIs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in frequency of condomless sex
Time Frame: 4 month visit, 8 month visit, 12, month visit
Self-reported insertive or receptive anal sex without the use of a condom.
4 month visit, 8 month visit, 12, month visit
Number of incident STIs from Baseline
Time Frame: 12 month visit
Chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV
12 month visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Psychosocial Mediators
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 4, 8, 12 month visits
Items will be used to measure potential psychosocial mediators (e.g. self-acceptance questionnaire, distress questionnaire) at each major visit.
Measured at baseline, 4, 8, 12 month visits
Cost-effectiveness of intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of the experimental versus the comparison condition.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew J Mimiaga, ScD, MPH, Brown University
  • Principal Investigator: Conall M O'Cleirigh, Ph.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infection

Clinical Trials on Self-acceptance based intervention

3
Subscribe