Allogeinic Bone Paste

October 22, 2020 updated by: Biobank

Prospective, Non-randomized, Single Center Clinical Study of Cervical Interbody Fusion Using a Viral-inactivated Allogeneic Graft

This is a prospective, single arm, single center clinical study to evaluate efficacy and safety of a Supercritical CO2 viral-inactivated allogenic bone paste in cervical interbody fusion. Patient eligible for 1- or 2-level ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion) combined with bone graft after failure of well-conducted medical treatment will be screened for the study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cervical and lumbar fusion are often the best option for various degenerative conditions that do not respond to conservative treatment. Historically, the reference technique for cervical fusion was the use of iliac crest autogenic bone graft (ICBG). However, the use of ICBG has several drawbacks, including the morbidity of the donor site, the increase in operating time and the variable quality of autograft. Alternatives to ICBG for cervical fusion include the use of allografts, graft extensions and osteobiological materials to improve fusion rates.

This is a prospective, single arm, single center clinical study to evaluate efficacy and safety of a Supercritical CO2 viral-inactivated allogenic bone paste in cervical interbody fusion. Patient eligible for 1- or 2-level ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion) combined with bone graft after failure of well-conducted medical treatment will be screened for the study.

Subjects will be followed up postoperatively per standard of care at 3 months, 6 months, 12 and 24 months at the clinic. The following outcomes will be measured: overall success, Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS neck and arm pain, SF-12 health survey, major complications, subsequent surgery rate, and fusion rate on radiological examinations. The primary endpoint is a FDA composite definition of success comprising clinical improvement and absence of major complications and secondary surgery events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Recruiting
        • Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
        • Contact:
          • Jean-Charles LE HUEC, M.D; Prof
          • Phone Number: +33564601547
          • Email: jclehuec1@aol.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female, aged ≥18 years old
  2. Patient eligible for anterior cervical fusion combined with bone graft after failure of well-conducted medical treatment.
  3. Arthrodesis performed on up to 2 levels and fused by one or more plates with an interbody cage on at least one level
  4. Radicular signs and symptoms in one or both arms (i.e., pain, paresthesia, or paresis in a specific nerve root distribution) or symptoms and signs of acute or chronic myelopathy
  5. X-ray diagnosis of cervical herniated disc and/or osteophyte at 1 or 2 levels depending on clinical signs and symptoms, disc degeneration, trauma without neurological damage
  6. Ability and willingness to comply with project requirements
  7. Written informed consent given by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute local or systemic infection
  2. Women who are pregnant or in a desire to be pregnant or breast-feeding
  3. Any contraindication to the proposed surgical procedure
  4. Previous cervical surgery (either anterior or posterior)
  5. Surgery performed over several operating times
  6. Arthrodesis performed posteriorly or involving more than 2 levels or not requiring the use of a bone graft
  7. Systemic disease, metabolic bone disease and autoimmune disease.
  8. Use of any known drug to potentially interfere with the healing of bones and soft tissues (corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents...)
  9. Any other concomitant medical disease or treatment that could significantly alter the normal healing process as assessed by the investigator
  10. Neoplasm of the spine
  11. Severe mental or psychiatric disorders
  12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's view, would adversely affect patient safety or would not meet the requirements of the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Allogeinic Bone Paste
Supercritical CO2 viral-inactivated allogeinic bone paste derived from human living donor femoral heads
1- or 2-level ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion) combined with bone graft

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall subject study success
Time Frame: 3, 6,12 and 24 months
  • Change from baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI): Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at 3 months, 6 months, 12 and 24 months
  • Rate of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and reoperations during Follow-up visits
  • Interbody fusion rate measured by CT scans and standard radiographs at 3 months, 6 months, 12 and 24 months

Overall subject study success is defined as (1) no device or implantation procedure related SAEs; (2) no additional surgical intervention at the operative level, including supplemental fixation, revision, and/or device removal; and (3) minimum 15-point improvement in NDI scores.

3, 6,12 and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain and Self reported outcomes
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
  • Change from baseline neck and arm pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at 3 months, 6 months, 12 and 24 months
  • Change from baseline Health Survey measured by SF-12: Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at 3 months, 6 months, 12 and 24 months
  • Potential product benefits assessment by:

    • Surgery time (from incision to wound closure)
    • Product ease of use measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at immediate postoperative visit.
3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Charles LE HUEC, M.D., Prof, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine - BORDEAUX - FRANCE

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ID-RCB : 2019-A02979-48

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Fusion

Clinical Trials on Cervical fusion

Subscribe