Trial Investigating the Characteristics of Knismesis - a Lever to Explore Allodynia in Neuropathic Pain (TICKLE)

December 1, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Also known as a "moving itch", knismesis is a mildly annoying sensation caused by a light movement on the skin, such as from a crawling insect. Its underlying mechanism rely on spatial summation, i.e. amplification of the signal due to summation of stimulated fields, like it is for dynamic allodynia in neuropathic pain. This physiological study aims at determining the physical factors of the cutaneous stimulation inducing knismesis as well as the effect of confounding factors. The main area of exploration will be the back, because of its size and the possibility to blind the participant. The information collected, along with animal data in surrogate models, would help to better understand neuropathic pain in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a physiological proof-of-concept, also aiming to validate a functional exploration model in healthy volunteers. Each participant will undergo a battery if psychometric then psychophysics tests, presented sequentially. However, most of the main study tests (knismesis) will be admistered in a random order (crossover). The primary endpoint is to characterise, in the healthy human, the physical determinants of the cutaneous stimulation inducing knismesis: length of the pathway, speed, direction, intensity, continuity break of the contact, hairiness, body site, or distraction by other cutaneous stimuli. The secondary endpoint is to study the relationship between the individual sensitivity to spatial summation (knismesis) and other individual sensitivities or profiles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Auvergne
      • Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France, 63000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital, Clermont Ferrand
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christian DUALE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Ability to answer French questionnaires.

· BMI between 19 and 30 kg/m2 at inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Natural intolerance to tickling.
  • Any cutaneous, ocular or neurological disease contraindicating the psychophysical tests.
  • Any disease or medical history that could expose the subject to unacceptable risk during the study.
  • Any medication intake within 7 days before testing.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Involvement in another concomitant research protocol.
  • Major dorsal hairiness.
  • Inability to undergo the tests.
  • Legal protection.
  • Concomitant involvement in another clinical research.
  • Refusal to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study group
healthy volunteers aged 18-35, balanced sex ratio, all of them undergoing the same battery of psychophysical explorations.

Visit 1: Biometry collection: gender, age, weight, height, eye colour.

  • Questionnaires : the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Pain Sensitivity
  • Threshold of unpleasant light brightness, mechanical sensitivity threshold (von Frey hair).
  • Training to estimate unpleasantness Under nociceptive and tickling stimuli, to use the handgrip.
  • Mechanical pain threshold (electronic von Frey), heat pain threshold (Medoc Pathway).
  • 48 stimulations applied to the back skin, following a predetermined plan with 12 different pathways, imbricated with 4 different speeds of movement.

Visit 2 (1 to 8 days later) :

  • 42 stimulations applied to the back skin, to test the effect of stimulation intensity, the side of application, continuity break of the contact, and distraction by other cutaneous stimuli. The stimuli will follow the best paradigm as identified at the previous visit.
  • 12 stimulations applied to forearm, cheeks, lower limbs, also testing the effect of hairiness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of annoying sensation
Time Frame: Day 1
After training, the annoying sensation is expressed by the subject through a handgrip dynamometer (Biopac systems). The signal will be treated and converted into area-under-curve response (Dualé C et al., Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36:110-115).
Day 1
Intensity of annoying sensation
Time Frame: Day 8
After training, the annoying sensation is expressed by the subject through a handgrip dynamometer (Biopac systems). The signal will be treated and converted into area-under-curve response (Dualé C et al., Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36:110-115).
Day 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscular aversive response.
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8
The muscular aversive response will be assessed by surface electromyography through paraspinal contact electrodes (Biopac systems).
Day 1, Day 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Battery of neurophysiological explorations

Subscribe