Co-incubation of Oocytes With Sperm: Defining the Optimal Incubation Time

August 9, 2024 updated by: ART Fertility Clinics LLC
The current pilot study aims to evaluate the fertilization rates between sibling oocytes subjected to short incubation (2h) versus overnight incubation (16-20h). As secondary objectives, the abnormal fertilization, embryo development, blastocyst biopsy and euploid rates will be analyzed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients for whom at least 6 cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) are assigned to IVF, with normal sperm parameters, are eligible for the study. An electronically generated randomization list will allocate the first half of the oocytes to one arm and the other half of the oocytes to the second arm. In case an odd number of oocytes will be inseminated, one extra oocyte will be allocated to the first arm. In this prospective observational pilot study, the fertilization potential of 40 patients will be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 43 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sperm parameters

    • Sperm concentration before capacitation: >15 million per ml (WHO) Total motility (PR+NP %): >40 (WHO) Progressive motility (PR %):>32 (WHO)
    • Sperm concentration after capacitation: >0.6 million per ml (not WHO defined) Progressive motility (PR %):>65 (WHO)
  • ≥6 COCs assigned to IVF
  • BMI ≤35 kg/m2
  • Female age 18 to ≤ 43 years
  • All ovarian stimulation protocols
  • Fresh ejaculates
  • Abstinence duration 2-5 days
  • Presence or absence of sperm morphology data: as we do not have a diagnostic sperm analysis for all patients, the presence or absence of >4% normal morphology (WHO) will not be taken into account, even with known low (<4%) normal morphology
  • Couples requesting Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies
  • Arab population

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If the volume to be added after IVF is insufficient to perform IVF on all needed oocytes
  • Presence of >1 million per ml round cells in the ejaculate
  • If a couple's previous cycle was included in the study
  • Previous history of fertilization failure or <50% fertilisation
  • Globozoospermia
  • PCO according to the Rotterdam criteria
  • Progesterone >1.5 ng/ml on the day of trigger

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IVF: 2h exposure
Half of a patients' oocytes will be subjected to 2h exposure to sperm
Oocytes will only be briefly (2h) exposed to progressive motile sperm for insemination
Other Names:
  • short exposure
Active Comparator: IVF: overnight exposure
Half of a patients' oocytes will be subjected to overnight incubation with sperm (=usual practice).
Oocytes will be exposed for a longer duration (overnight, 16-20h) to progressive motile sperm for insemination
Other Names:
  • long exposure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normal fertilization rate
Time Frame: 2 days
presence of two pronuclei per inseminated oocyte
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of COCs assigned to each group
Time Frame: 2 days
number of oocytes, per patient, assigned to each exposure group
2 days
Maturation rate
Time Frame: 2 days
number of mature oocytes obtained in each arm
2 days
Fertilization
Time Frame: 3 days
Number of abnormally fertilized oocytes and failed fertilization
3 days
Total fertilization failure
Time Frame: 3 days
Number of cycles with complete fertilization failure (in one arm or in both arms)
3 days
Embryo quality on day 3
Time Frame: 5 days
defined by the Istanbul consensus (Alpha Scientists, 2011) The number of blastomeres and their division pattern, fragmentation, presence of compaction, vacuoles, granulation and nuclei will divide the embryos into 3 categories: good, fair or poor
5 days
Embryo quality on day 5
Time Frame: 8 days
defined by a modified model of Gardner and Schoolcraft,1999
8 days
blastulation rate I
Time Frame: 8 days
number of embryos reaching at least the BL1 stage/ number of oocytes assigned to that group: defined by a 1 (yes, the embryo is blastulating) or 0 (no, the embryo is not blastulating)
8 days
blastulation rate II
Time Frame: 8 days
number of embryos reaching at least the BL1 stage/ number of mature oocytes in that group: defined by a 1 (yes, the embryo is blastulating) or 0 (no, the embryo is not blastulating)
8 days
Utilization rate
Time Frame: 8 days
number of embryos that can be used for the patient (=number of embryos that can be biopsied)/number of oocytes assigned to the group
8 days
Day of trophectoderm biopsy
Time Frame: 8 days
Day at which the blastocyst reaches sufficient expansion to perform biopsy of trophectoderm cells
8 days
Euploid rate
Time Frame: 8 days
Number of genetically normal embryos per total number of blastocysts biopsied, stratified per day of biopsy
8 days
Morphokinetic parameters
Time Frame: 10 days

As embryos will be monitored in a time lapse imaging system, morphokinetic parameters will be compared between both exposure arms: o t2: the timing to two cells

  • t3: the timing to three cells
  • t4: the timing to four cells
  • t5: the timing to five cells
  • t8: the timing to eight cells
  • SC: starting to compact
  • M: the timing to morula
  • SB: starting to blastulate
  • B: reaching a BL3 according to Gardner and Schoolcraft, 1999
  • F: reaching a BL4 according to Gardner and Schoolcraft, 1999
  • cc2: t3-t2
  • s2: t4-t3
10 days
Pregnancy outcome
Time Frame: 60 days
dichotomous variable defined by the presence of βhCG test of > 15IU 12-15 days after embryo transfer
60 days
Biochemical pregnancy
Time Frame: 70 days
dichotomous variable defined as a pregnancy in which the hCG levels start do decrease after 1 week
70 days
Implantation rate
Time Frame: 80 days

defined by the number of gestational sacs/number of embryos transferred

• Clinical pregnancy (yes or no) defined by the ultrasonographic visualization of one or more gestational sacs, including ectopic pregnancies

80 days
Clinical pregnancy Fetal Heart beat positive
Time Frame: 80 days
dichotomous variable defined by the ultrasonographic visualization of one or more gestational sacs, with fetal heart beat at 7 weeks.
80 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neelke De Munck, PhD, ART Fertility Clinics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010-ABU-010-ND

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The principal investigator will gather all data for the study and prepare the database for the statistician, who will be blinded for patient information.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe