Resistance Training in Cardiovascular Disease Patients (RT in CVD)

November 18, 2020 updated by: General Hospital Murska Sobota

Resistance Training in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation

In this study coronary artery disease patients and patients with heart failure will be randomly assigned to three training groups: combined aerobic interval training with high intensity resistance training, combined aerobic interval training with low intensity resistance training and aerobic interval training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes have predominantly used aerobic-dynamic exercise modalities, whereas resistance training have been discouraged in patients with cardiovascular disease, due to safety concerns related to cardiovascular response (heart rate and blood pressure) during the exertion. Contrary to such concerns, recent hemodynamic studies have reported lower blood pressure and heart rate during higher intensity resistance training (>70 % 1-RM) compared to lower intensity resistance training (>40 % 1-RM). Furthermore, the latest meta analysis have demonstrated that combined resistance training with standard aerobic interval training has been superior than aerobic training alone in several aspects of health.

However, there is still huge heterogeneity in training intervention design, also there still lacks studies to further elucidate the effects of high intensity resistance training combined with aerobic training on physical performance (aerobic capacity, muscle strength, balance), body composition, quality of life, morbidity, mortality, etc. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of high (70%-80 % 1-RM) versus low loads (30%- 40 % 1-RM) resistance training in combination with aerobic interval cycling (50 % -80% of baseline peak Power output) in coronary artery disease patients and patients with heart failure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Murska Sobota, Slovenia, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Division of Cardiology, General Hospital Murska Sobota
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tim Kambič, MKin
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vedran Hadžić, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jerneja Farkaš Lainščak, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nejc Šarabon, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable patients with documented CAD with clinical event (>1 month after acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention) or coronarography and/or
  • Stable Heart Failure patients with documented reduced ejection fraction (>40-45 %)
  • age >18 years
  • NYHA class I-III
  • Cardiopulmonary exercise test without ECG abnormalities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable CHD
  • Decompensated HF
  • Uncontrolled arrhythmias
  • Severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis
  • Acute myocarditis, endocarditis, or pericarditis
  • Aortic dissection
  • Marfan syndrome
  • Musculoskeletal limitations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aerobic interval training with high loads resistance training
Patient to be randomised into "combined aerobic training with high loads resistance training group".
Patients enrolled in arm of the study will perform 12 weeks of combined aerobic interval training (5 intervals of cycling at the intensity of 50 %-80% of peak power obtained at baseline cardiopulmonary testing) combined with high intensity resistance training (3 sets of leg press at the intensity of 70 %- 80 % of one repetition maximum (1-RM)).
Other Names:
  • Aerobic and high intensity strength training
Active Comparator: Aerobic interval training with low loads resistance training
Patient to be randomised into "combined aerobic training with low loads resistance training group".
Patients enrolled in arm of the study will perform 12 weeks of combined aerobic interval training (5 intervals of cycling at the intensity of 50 %-80% of peak power obtained at baseline cardiopulmonary testing) combined with high intensity resistance training (3 sets of leg press at the intensity of 30 %- 40 % 1-RM).
Other Names:
  • Aerobic and low intensity strength training
Active Comparator: Aerobic interval training
Patient to be randomised into "aerobic training training group".
Patients enrolled in arm of the study will perform 12 weeks of aerobic interval training (5 intervals of cycling at the intensity of 50 %-80% of peak power obtained at baseline cardiopulmonary testing).
Other Names:
  • Aerobic training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Maximal aerobic capacity
Time Frame: Change in maximal aerobic capacity at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in VO2 max (ml/kg/min)
Change in maximal aerobic capacity at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Maximal voluntary contraction of knee extensors
Time Frame: Change in maximal isometric torque at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in maximal isometric torque of knee extensors
Change in maximal isometric torque at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time Frame: Change in HOMA-IR at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in HOMA IR (%)
Change in HOMA-IR at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in glucose levels
Time Frame: Change in glucose levels at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in glucose levels (mmol/L)
Change in glucose levels at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in insulin levels
Time Frame: Change in insulin levels at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in insulin levels
Change in insulin levels at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in systolic blood pressure during high and low load resistance exercise
Time Frame: Change of systolic blood pressure during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Measured as change in systolic blood pressure during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) values
Change of systolic blood pressure during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Change in diastolic blood pressure during high and low load resistance exercise
Time Frame: Change of diastolic blood pressure during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Measured as change in diastolic blood pressure during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise)
Change of diastolic blood pressure during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Change in heart rate during high and low load resistance exercise
Time Frame: Change of heart rate during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Measured as change in heart rate during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise)
Change of heart rate during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Change in rating of perceived exertion during high and low load resistance exercise
Time Frame: Change of rating of perceived exertion (score 0-10, 0-no exertion, 10-maximal exertion) during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Measured as change of rating of perceived exertion (0-10) during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise)
Change of rating of perceived exertion (score 0-10, 0-no exertion, 10-maximal exertion) during resistance exercise compared to baseline (pre-exercise) within the first and the last week of the intervention
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) total score
Time Frame: Change in the Short Physical Performance battery test total score (0-the worse outcome, 12- the best outcome) after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in points of the SPPB after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in the Short Physical Performance battery test total score (0-the worse outcome, 12- the best outcome) after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in time of the "Up and Go" test
Time Frame: Change in seconds of the "Up and Go" test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change of time (s) in "Up and Go" test
Change in seconds of the "Up and Go" test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Grip strength test (kg)
Time Frame: Change in kg of Grip strength test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change of kg in Grip strength test
Change in kg of Grip strength test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Arm curl test (number of repetitions)
Time Frame: Change in number of repetitions of the Arm curl test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change of number of repetitions in Arm curl test
Change in number of repetitions of the Arm curl test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in time of the Sit to stand test
Time Frame: Change in seconds of the Sit to stand test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in time (s) of the Sit and stand test
Change in seconds of the Sit to stand test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in One Leg Heel Raise test (number of repetitions)
Time Frame: Change in number of repetitions of One leg heel raise test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change of number of repetitions in One leg heel raise test
Change in number of repetitions of One leg heel raise test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in total energy expenditure
Time Frame: Change in kcal after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in kcal using accelerometry data
Change in kcal after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in sedentary activity level
Time Frame: Change in minutes of sedentary activity after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in minutes spent in sedentary activity level using accelerometry data
Change in minutes of sedentary activity after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in moderate to vigorous physical activity level
Time Frame: Change in minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity level using accelerometry data
Change in minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in the Back Scratch test
Time Frame: Change in cm of the Back Scratch test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in cm of the Back Scratch test
Change in cm of the Back Scratch test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in the Chair Sit and Reach test
Time Frame: Change in cm of the Chair sit and Reach test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in cm of the Chair Sit and Reach test
Change in cm of the Chair sit and Reach test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Stork balance test
Time Frame: Change in seconds of the Stork balance test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in seconds of the Stork balance test
Change in seconds of the Stork balance test after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Short form Health related quality of life questionnaire (SF-12)
Time Frame: Change in score of the Short form 12 items health related questionnaire (12 points -the lowest score, 47 points the highest score) after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in score of the SF-12
Change in score of the Short form 12 items health related questionnaire (12 points -the lowest score, 47 points the highest score) after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Patients health questionnaire score (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change in score of the Patients health 9-item questionnaire (0 points-the best outcome, 27 points-the worse outcome) after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in points of PHQ-9 questionnaire
Change in score of the Patients health 9-item questionnaire (0 points-the best outcome, 27 points-the worse outcome) after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
Time Frame: Change in % after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as percent change of RER during cardiopulmonary exercise test
Change in % after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Ve/VCO2 slope ratio
Time Frame: Change in ratio of VE/VCO2 slope after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in VE/VCO2 slope
Change in ratio of VE/VCO2 slope after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) level
Time Frame: Change in TNF-alpha level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in TNF-alpha
Change in TNF-alpha level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Interleukin 6 (IL-6) level
Time Frame: Change in IL-6 level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in IL-6 level
Change in IL-6 level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Human Growth hormone (hGH) level
Time Frame: Change in hGH level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in hGH level
Change in hGH level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in Insulin like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)
Time Frame: Change in IGF-1 level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in IGF-1 level
Change in IGF-1 level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Change in N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: Change in NT-proBNP level after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Measured as change in NT-proBNP level
Change in NT-proBNP level after 12 weeks compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mitja Lainščak, MD, PhD, General Hospital Murska Sobota; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Tim Kambič, MKin, General Hospital Murska Sobota; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Aerobic interval training combined with high intensity resistance training

3
Subscribe