- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04668885
CPX-351 as a Novel Approach for the Treatment of Older Patients With AML and MDS
Lower Doses of CPX-351 as a Novel Approach for the Treatment of Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Currently, elderly patients with AML and high risk MDS, who are ineligible to receive induction chemotherapy and fail HMA +/- combination, have very poor outcomes and there is no FDA-approved therapy outside of some targeted therapies which can only be applied to a small patient population. CPX-351 is an investigational (experimental) drug that works by combining two anti-cancer drugs cytarabine and daunorubicin. CPX-351 is experimental because it is only FDA approved for the treatment of adults with two types of AML: newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes.
This is an open label clinical trial of lower doses of CPX-351 in relapsed/primary refractory older AML and MDS patients ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. The first arm is for particpants with primary refractory/relapsed AML and the second arm is for higher risk MDS participants after HMA failure.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5065
- Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary refractory or relapsed AML (defined by 2016 World Health Organization [WHO] criteria) patients who are not suitable for or not willing to receive intensive chemotherapy as evaluated by the treating physician. Primary refractory disease is defined as:
- Failure to achieve a CR, CRi, or mLFS (defined as <5% Bone Marrow (BM) blasts) after receiving 1 or 2 cycles of remission induction chemotherapy.
- Failure to achieve a CR, CRi, or MLFS (defined as <5% BM blasts) after receiving 4 cycles of non-intensive chemotherapy or whose disease progressed at any time point during the treatment.
- Participants with MDS (according to 2016 WHO criteria) who did not respond to treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, or combination of HMA with another drug or lost their response to initial therapy with HMA.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status <=2
- Adequate hepatic (serum total bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN, Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) and/or serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) <2.5 x ULN) and renal function (creatinine < 1.5mg/dL).
- Participants must be willing and able to review, understand, and provide written consent before starting therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active signs or symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) involvement by malignancy (lumbar puncture [LP] not required).
- Prior 7+3 remission induction chemotherapy for MDS or AML
- More than 2 lines of prior non-intensive therapy.
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart disease, active ischemia or any other uncontrolled cardiac condition such as angina pectoris, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia on rhythm control strategy or on pacemaker, uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure > 160 systolic and > 110 diastolic not responsive to antihypertensive medication)
- Acute myocardial infarction in the previous 12 weeks (from the start of treatment).
- Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that, in the view of the treating physician, would place the participant at an unacceptable risk if he or she were to participate in the study or would prevent that person from giving informed consent.
- Any active malignancy (unrelated, non-hematological malignancy) diagnosed within the past 6 months of starting the study drug (other than curatively treated carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer).
- History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to CPX-351.
- Subjects with uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
- Known history of HIV or active hepatitis B or C.
- No major surgery within 2 weeks prior to study enrollment.
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Male and female participants who are fertile who do not agree to use an effective barrier methods of birth control (i.e. abstinence) to avoid pregnancy while receiving study treatment and for 30 days after last dose of study treatment. Non-childbearing is defined as > 1 year postmenopausal or surgically sterilized.
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Primary refractory/relapsed AML
Lower dose CPX-351 in participants with primary refractory/relapsed AML.
Participants will receive an induction and maintenance phase of CPX-351
|
Induction phase: CPX-351 15 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 3 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 6 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity Maintenance phase: CPX-351 7.5 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 3 for two cycles alternating with 15 mg/m^2 for one cycle. Participants may receive up to 12 cycles of maintenance phase in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. |
Experimental: MDS after HMA failure
Lower dose CPX-351 in participants with MDS after HMA failure.
Participants will receive an induction and maintenance phase of CPX-351
|
Induction phase: CPX-351 15 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 3 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 6 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity Maintenance phase: CPX-351 7.5 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 3 for two cycles alternating with 15 mg/m^2 for one cycle. Participants may receive up to 12 cycles of maintenance phase in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 International Working Group (IWG) criteria
Time Frame: At 6 months
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 6 months
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 1 year
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 1 year
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 1.5 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 1.5 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 2 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 2 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 2.5 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 2.5 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 3 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 3 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 3.5 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 3.5 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 4 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 4 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 4.5 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 4.5 years
|
Overall response rate (ORR) per 2003 IWG criteria
Time Frame: At 5 years
|
ORR = complete response (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + partial remission (PR) as defined by 2003 IWG criteria for AML patients, and ORR = CR + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) and as defined per 2006 IWG criteria for MDS patients
|
At 5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 6 months
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 6 months
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 1 year
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 1 year
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 1.5 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 1.5 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 2 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 2 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 2.5 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 2.5 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 3 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 3 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 3.5 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 3.5 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 4 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 4 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 4.5 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 4.5 years
|
Time to response (TTR)
Time Frame: At 5 years
|
TTR is measured from start of treatment to the date of achieving a response.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 5 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 6 months
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 6 months
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 1 year
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 1 year
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 1.5 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 1.5 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 2 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 2 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 2.5 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 2.5 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 3 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 3 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 3.5 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 3.5 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 4 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 4 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 4.5 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 4.5 years
|
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: At 5 years
|
DOR measured from the time of achieving a response to time of disease progression.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables.
|
At 5 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 6 months
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 6 months
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 1 year
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 1 year
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 1.5 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 1.5 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 2 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 2 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 2.5 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 2.5 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 3 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 3 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 3.5 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 3.5 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 4 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 4 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 4.5 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 4.5 years
|
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: At 5 years
|
EFS measured from date of first dose to the date of treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause.
Wilcoxon rank test will be used for comparison of continuous variables
|
At 5 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 6 months
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 6 months
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 1 year
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 1 year
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 1.5 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 1.5 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 2 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 2 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 2.5 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 2.5 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 3 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 3 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 3.5 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 3.5 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 4 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 4 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 4.5 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 4.5 years
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: At 5 years
|
OS measured from start of treatment to death or last follow up.
OS function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
|
At 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sudipto Mukherjee, MD, PhD, Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CASE1920
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPreviously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes | Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes | de Novo Myelodysplastic SyndromesUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPreviously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes | Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes | de Novo Myelodysplastic SyndromesUnited States
-
GCP-Service International West GmbHSaint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France; University of Florence; Medical University... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingLow Risk Myelodysplastic SyndromesSpain, Poland, Italy, Germany, France
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteCompletedMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States
-
TJ Biopharma Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)National Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States, Israel
-
AbbVieCelgene; Genentech, Inc.CompletedMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States, Australia, Germany
-
AbbVieGenentech, Inc.Active, not recruitingMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...UnknownMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)China
-
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.TerminatedMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States
Clinical Trials on CPX-351
-
French Innovative Leukemia OrganisationAcute Leukemia French Association; French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative...RecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Myeloproliferative SyndromeFrance
-
Groupe Francophone des MyelodysplasiesCompleted
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsIqvia Pty LtdCompleted
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedTherapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myelodysplasia-Related ChangesUnited States
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsAdvice Pharma S.r.l.RecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myelodysplasia-Related ChangesItaly
-
Yale UniversityWithdrawn
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Myelodysplastic Syndromes | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | Hematologic MalignancyUnited States, Canada
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
PETHEMA FoundationCompletedNewly Diagnosed Secondary or High Risk AMLSpain
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityJazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedMyelodysplastic Syndrome | Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaUnited States