Assessment of the Reasons for Accepting or Refusing Early Palliative Care (PALPHA-1)

July 12, 2023 updated by: Centre Leon Berard

Assessment of the Reasons for Accepting or Refusing Early Palliative Care by the Patients Included in an Early Phase Clinical Trial

This is a prospective, multicentre study, considered as " non-RIPH ("Recherche n'Impliquant pas la Personne Humaine - Research that does not involve humans ". Indeed, the patient's participation in the study and the completion of the various questionnaires has no impact on patient's safety and is not likely to change patients' management. Patients accepting to take part to an early phase trial will be proposed to participate in the PALPHA-1 trial. They can accept or refuse to have palliative supportive care.

The main objective of this study is to assess the reasons for accepting and refusing early palliative care in patients included in an early phase clinical trial. The secondary objectives will enable to describe and analyze the number (effective) and the rate (%) of acceptance and/or refusal of early palliative support, to assess patients' understanding and perception of the " combined " management by comparing the semantic content of the patient-investigator ecological interaction during the proposal for inclusion in the trial (i.e. what was explicitly said), with that of the semi-structured post-consultation inclusion interviews ( ie what the patients understood, perceived), to compare the quality of life and the anxiety-depression of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the mixed care at the inclusion and at the end of the early phase trial, to compare the clinical, medical and socio-demographic characteristics of the patients, the overall survival of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the combined management and finally for the patients accepting the Palliative Care Management (PCM), to describe throughout the study, the patients' compliance to palliative supportive care undertaken.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In a context of promotion of precision medicine, if palliative management and inclusion in an Early Clinical trial Phase (ECP) may at first glance appear antagonistic, some authors support the idea of a possible synergy in order to improve quality of life, reduce symptoms of exhaustion linked to treatment side effects and allow patients to complete their treatment protocol. To date and to our knowledge, few studies have assessed the brakes and/or levers for patient acceptance and/or refusal as well as the feasibility of a such mixed therapeutic management therapeutic. In this context, the beliefs and representations of patients must be taken into account in the decision-making process, which is also governed by the social norms of the caregiver-patient relationship. A better understanding of patients' acceptance and/or refusal of palliative care is an essential and innovative prerequisite for better understanding the processes involved at this stage of the care process.

The main objective of this study is to assess the reasons for accepting and refusing early palliative care in patients included in an early phase clinical trial. The secondary objectives will enable to describe and analyze the number (effective) and the rate (%) of acceptance and/or refusal of early palliative support, to assess patients' understanding and perception of the " mixed " management by comparing the semantic content of the patient-investigator ecological interaction during the proposal for inclusion in the trial (i.e. what was explicitly said), with that of the semi-structured post-consultation inclusion interviews ( ie what the patients understood, perceived), to compare the quality of life and the anxiety-depression of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the mixed care at the inclusion and at the end of the early phase trial, to compare the clinical, medical and socio-demographic characteristics of the patients, the overall survival of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the combined management and finally for the patients accepting the PCM, to describe throughout the study, the patients' compliance to palliative supportive care undertaken.

All patients approached for inclusion in an early phase clinical trial during the Multidisciplinary Consultation Meeting (MCR) will be offered to participate to the study. In order to assess the reasons for accepting / refusing the inclusion in palliative supportive care in patients entering an early phase clinical trial, two subgroups will be formed. The first group will be made up of patients who accepts joint palliative care (n = 20) and the second group of those who refuse (n = 20). Following their acceptance, the consultation for setting up the early phase clinical trial will be recorded and participants will be invited to participate in a semi-structured interview just before the first line of treatment. Patients (both having accepted or refused the palliative care) will also have to answer a self-questionnaire on quality of life and anxiety-depression at inclusion and at the end of the clinical trial. The study results will make it possible to determine patients' motivations for accepting or refusing palliative care management in order to better define their expectations, beliefs in terms of management, their understanding and impact of this management.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69008
        • Centre Léon Bérard

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a prospective, multicentre study, considered as " non-RIPH (Recherche n'Impliquant pas la Personne Humaine - Research that does not involve humans ". Indeed, the patient's participation in the study and the completion of the various questionnaires has no impact on patient's safety and is not likely to change patient's management. Patients accepting to take part to an early phase trial will be proposed to participate in the PALPHA-1 trial. They can accept or refuse to have palliative supportive care. Patients' follow up will be performed according to the palliative standard procedures.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18
  • Patient included in an early phase clinical trial
  • Patient who has not been taken in charge for palliative care
  • Life expectancy of at least 16 weeks
  • Patient not opposed to data's collection and processing for the study
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to read/understand the French language
  • Patient with psychological disability (e.g. too great vulnerability, psychiatric disorder) or physical disability (e.g. physical / motor disability)
  • Patients under autorship, curators or legal protection,
  • Patients already participating in a clinical trial or interventional study related to supportive care.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients accepting palliative care
Patients included in an early phase trial and accepting palliative care
Patients refusing palliative car
Patients included in an early phase trial but refusing palliative care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the reasons for accepting / refusing early palliative care in patients included in an early phase clinical trial
Time Frame: At baseline
Thematic content analysis of semi-directive qualitative interviews
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Description and analysis of the number (effective) of acceptance of early palliative support
Time Frame: At baseline
Numbers of acceptance of the early palliative care management for all patients seen in early phase unit consultation
At baseline
Description and analysis of the percentage of acceptance of early palliative support
Time Frame: At baseline
Percentages of acceptance of the early palliative care management for all patients seen in early phase unit consultation
At baseline
Assessment of patients' understanding and perception of the early palliative care management
Time Frame: At baseline
Comparison of qualitative semantic content of patient-investigator interaction with the semi-directive post-consultation inclusion interview
At baseline
Comparison of the quality of life of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the mixed care
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Quality of life evaluated with the FACT-G7 (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General - 7-item version) questionnaire (range from 0 (better outcome) to 28 (worse outcome)
Up to 24 months
Comparison of the anxiety-depression of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the mixed care
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Anxiety-depression evaluated with the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaire (range 0-7: No symptoms, range 8-10: Doubtful symptoms, range >=11: Symptoms of anxiety or depression)
Up to 24 months
Comparison of the clinical, medical and socio-demographic characteristics of patients for the patients accepting the palliative care management
Time Frame: At baseline
Using PALLIA 10 scale (PALLIAtive scale composed of 10 items, minimum value: 1, maximum value: 10. A specialized advice in palliative care is required if score > 3)
At baseline
Comparison of the clinical, medical and socio-demographic characteristics of patients who accept or refuse the palliative care management
Time Frame: At baseline
Using PRONOPALL score (Prognostic overall survival score). Range 0-3: Favorable overall survival score, Range 4-7: Intermediate overall survival score, Range 8-10: Unfavorable overall survival score.
At baseline
Comparison of the clinical characteristics of patients who accept or refuse the palliative care management
Time Frame: At baseline
Clinical symptoms evaluated using ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) questionnaire (range from 0 (better outcome) to 10 (worse outcome))
At baseline
Comparison of the socio-demographic characteristics of patients who accept or refuse the palliative care management
Time Frame: At baseline
Patients' characteristics (Age, sex, family situation, place of residence, socio-educational level, professional activity)
At baseline
Comparison of the medical characteristics of patients who accept or refuse the palliative care management
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Patients' medical history: Treatments
Up to 24 months
Comparison of the medical characteristics of patients who accept or refuse the palliative care management
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Patients' medical history: Use of specialists' consultations (e.g. intensive care unit, emergency hospitalization, palliative care unit, number/types of consultations, pain, nutrition)
Up to 24 months
Comparison of the use of social services of patients who accept or refuse the palliative care management
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Patients' medical history: Use of social service...
Up to 24 months
Overall survival of patients according to their acceptance or refusal of the "mixed" management
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Vital status
Up to 24 months
For patients having accepted the palliative support, description throughout the study of patients' compliance to palliative supportive care undertaken
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Patients having performed at least 50 percent of the visits
Up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gisèle CHVETZOFF, MD, Centre Léon Bérard

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ET20-101 PALPHA-1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

3
Subscribe