Couple HOPES (Helping Overcome PTSD and Enhance Satisfaction) (HOPES)

January 24, 2023 updated by: Skye Fitzpatrick, York University

Expanding a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Couple Internet-Delivered PTSD Intervention to Reach Military Members, Veterans, and First Responders With COVID-19-Related Trauma Exposure

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) will be a severe problem in Canada in the wake of COVID-19, especially for Military Members, Veterans, First Responders, and Healthcare Workers (MVFH). However, gold standard face-to-face PTSD treatments do not meet current MVFH needs, which requires virtual interventions and minimal healthcare resources. Recognizing the need for a virtual, low-resource PTSD intervention for MVFH with PTSD and their loved ones, the investigators developed Couple HOPES (Helping Overcome PTSD and Enhance Satisfaction). Couple HOPES is a secure, online self-help intervention for those with PTSD and their partners (www.couplehopes.com). However, MVFH are now particularly likely to be exposed to traumas related to COVID-19. It is essential to identify if Couple HOPES is safe and helpful for couples involving MVFH with COVID-19-related PTSD specifically. This project will therefore test the efficacy of Couple HOPES compared to a delayed waitlist control in 70 couples wherein one member is a MVFH with COVID-19-related PTSD. The investigators will examine if Couple HOPES is helpful in improving PTSD symptoms and relationship satisfaction for such couples, and if it is more or less helpful to this end for these couples compared to those with other forms of trauma exposure. 70 couples including a MVFH with COVID-19-related PTSD, will be randomly assigned to receive Couple HOPES or to a waitlist. PTSD symptoms and relationship satisfaction will be measured ~weekly during the intervention and one month after it. Related problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, healthcare use) will be measured before, in the middle of, after, and one month after, the intervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3
        • York University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individual who is a Canadian military member, veteran, first responder or healthcare worker with clinically significant levels of PTSD symptoms related to COVID-19
  • Individual who is an American healthcare worker with clinically significant levels of PTSD symptoms related to COVID-19
  • Must be willing to be audio-recorded for coaching sessions
  • Intimate partner willing to participant and complete intervention modules together
  • Access to high speed internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Elevated suicide risk
  • Severe physical aggression between partners in the past year
  • Clinically significant PTSD symptoms in both members of the dyad

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immediate Couple HOPES
Immediately assigned to receive seven modules of an Internet-delivered self-help intervention with paraprofessional coaching for PTSD completed at the participant's own pace within 8 weeks.
Couple HOPES is a guided self-help intervention for individuals with PTSD and their partners based on Cognitive-Behavioral Conjoint Therapy for PTSD (Monson & Fredman, 2012). This intervention consists of text and video-based content across seven intervention modules and phone and online-based coaching sessions with a paraprofessional. Participants are able to complete these modules in their own home or private location of their choosing. The primary outcomes are PTSD symptoms, relationship satisfaction, and the mental health and wellbeing of partners of those with PTSD.
No Intervention: Delayed Intervention
Participants will not receive Couple HOPES for the first 8 weeks, and complete assessments at the beginning, middle, and end of this period. After this 8-week delay, participants will then receive seven modules of an Internet-delivered self-help intervention with paraprofessional coaching for PTSD completed at the participant's own pace within 8 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (PCL-5) with change measured as mean change from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, and 3 months after the intervention
Scores on the PCL-5 range from 0 to 80, with 80 being the most severe PTSD symptoms.
Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, and 3 months after the intervention
Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI-4) with change measured as mean change from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, and 3 months after the intervention
Score on the CSI-4 range from 0 to 21, with 21 being the most satisfied.
Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, and 3 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline on Ineffective Arguing Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Score range from 0 to 40, with 40 representing highly ineffective arguing.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Significant Others' Responses to Trauma Scale with change measured as mean change from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 0 to 76, with 76 representing high partner accommodation.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, 3 month post-treatment follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline on depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 0 to 27, with 27 being the most depressed.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Mean change from baseline on alcohol use as measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Self-Report Version
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 0 to 40, with a higher score signifying an alcohol use disorder.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Mean change from baseline in drug use based on the Drug Abuse Screen Test
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 0 to 10, with 10 being a severe level of problems related to drug abuse.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms with change measured as mean change from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 0 to 21, with 21 representing the highest level of anxiety.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory with change measured as mean change from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 0 to 40, with 40 representing higher levels of anger.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Mean change from baseline in perceived health measured with one item "How satisfied are you with your health"
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Scores range from 1 to 5, with 5 being the most satisfied.
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory with change measured as mean change from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Mean change from baseline in work functioning measured with one item "Please rate your ability to function at work. If you do not work outside the home, please rate your ability to complete household tasks."
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Mean change from baseline in quality of life measured with one item "How would you rate your quality of life."
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Baseline, week 3, week 8, after 3 modules are completed or 3 weeks into treatment, after 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment, 3 month post-treatment follow-up
Participant ratings of intervention satisfaction as indicated by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: After 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment
After 7 modules are completed or 8 weeks into treatment
Feasibility as measured by number of treatment sessions attended and rate of participant dropout
Time Frame: Once a week during treatment (for up to 8 weeks)
Once a week during treatment (for up to 8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Skye Fitzpatrick, PhD, York University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Monson, C. M., & Fredman, S. J. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD: Harnessing the healing power of relationships. New York, NY: Guilford.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-475
  • CIHR-IRSC:0525007697 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) 2018-2019 Foundation Grant)
  • W7714-207266 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Defence Security Orders and Directives)
  • 173098 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Couple HOPES Guided, Internet-Delivered, Self-Help Intervention

3
Subscribe