A Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) With WHO Guidelines for Staff in Residential Care Homes (BGCTS)

May 11, 2021 updated by: Dr Angela Leung, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

A Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) With WHO Guidelines for Staff in Residential Care Homes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

188 healthcare personnel from 20 residential care homes (RCHs) will be recruited to assess the effect of 2-week implementation of Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) on RCH staffs' infection control practices. These clusters (RCHs) will be randomly allocated to two study groups (the intervention group, IG; and the control group, CG) to assess 1. whether more staff in the IG perform infection control practices (by on-site observations) than the staff in the CG after receiving BGCTS and 2. whether more staff in the IG have infection control knowledge, positive attitudes towards infection control, and self-reported compliance rates than the staff in the CG. 5 Hypothesis have been set up for this study:

H1. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will exhibit performance in complying with hand hygiene measures than those in the CG.

H2. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will exhibit performance in complying with other infection control practices than those in the CG.

H3. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will have high level of knowledge of infection control than those in the CG.

H4. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will have positive attitudes towards infection control than those in the CG.

H5. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will have a high self-reported compliance rate with infection control measures than those in the CG.

Infection control practices conducted by RCH staffs will be measured through unobtrusive on-site non-participatory observations. RCH staffs' knowledge, attitudes about infection control practice, and self-reported infection control practices will be assessed via an electronic quiz.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Residents in residential care homes are at a high risk of being infected by COVID-19 due to the advanced age, associated co-morbidities, and state of dependence of the residents . According to the licensing requirements for RCHs in Hong Kong, a registered nurse is designated as an Infection Control Officer (ICO) to coordinate matters related to the prevention and handling of infectious diseases in each RCH. During the pandemic, the ICOs disseminate the COVID-19 guidelines, which were developed by the Centre for Health Protection (CHP) under the Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong government, to all staff in RCHs . Whether the staff understand and can correctly interpret the contents and adopt the guidelines into practice is unclear. There is nothing in the literature about the infection control training given by ICOs to the staff in RCHs.

Innovations:

The key innovation in this study is the adoption of the concept of gamification in COVID-19 infection control training. The investigators apply elements of game design (short video clips/interactive video games in the form of quizzes) in non-game environments (RCHs) within non-game contexts (infection control training). Gamification is widely used as an educational tool in different disciplines. For example, in the current study, one of the simulated situations is visitor management to avoid the entry of COVID-19 in RCHs. Sequential allocation in visitor management could be utilized in the gamified training programme, to allow learners the chance to practice in a virtual environment. The inappropriate management of visitors could lead to the spread of COVID-19 infections in an RCH, and learners could have a second chance to do better in a virtual environment.

Gamified training offers many benefits, the major one of which is that it allows learners to learn at a convenience time and place. The use of gamification restructures the experience of a traditional boring activity into something enjoyable, interactive, and competitive, with the result that learners can remain active and engaged throughout the learning process. In addition, training with the use of games can improve compliance with decided behaviour. Learners were found to have developed new skills and/or new habits via gamified training.

Objectives:

This study aims to assess the effect of the Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) on infection control practices, compliance rates and knowledge of standard precautions among all staff in residential care homes (RCHs).

The specific objectives and hypothesis of the study include:

  1. To assess whether more staff in the intervention group (IG) perform infection control practices (by on-site observations) than the staff in the control group (CG) after receiving the BGCTS;
  2. To assess whether more staff in the IG have infection control knowledge, positive attitudes towards infection control, and self-reported compliance rates than the staff in the CG.

Method:

This study collects data through on-site observations of infection control practices which requires resources and special training. Observations will be the primary outcome of this study. Special arrangements on conducting on-site non-participatory unobtrusive observations in RCHs will be made to ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Unobtrusive non-participatory observations of the infection control practices of healthcare personnel will be conducted in the RCHs. Healthcare personnel will include doctors, nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, health workers, and personal care workers who are working in the RCHs. Observations will be made at baseline (before the intervention) and after the intervention (post-intervention). Observations will be made in five areas: hand hygiene, respiratory hygiene, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), environmental cleaning and disinfection, and the proper handling of used or contaminated materials. A total of 200 observation opportunities per RCH unit will be made to avoid measurement bias.

At least three cameras (webcams with recording function) will be set up in each RCH to capture the staff's hand hygiene practice. The number of cameras will be determined after site visit to the RCH. The investigators would cover substantial areas of the RCH (including most of the hand washing facilities). Prior to the initiation of camera monitoring, staff of RCHs will be clearly informed about the recording. Camera recording will be made for 2 weeks in each RCH. Each week, the research assistant will go to the RCH and download the recordings to the designated computer for the sake of protecting the security of the recording (data). The obtained video recording will be evaluated by the research nurse, who will randomly select 20 to 30-minute recording per shift for observation (morning shift, afternoon shift and night shift). To protect privacy of the RCH staff, the staff will be de-identified and anonymized before observation, and all actions will be examined in confidentiality. This is designed to minimize the Hawthorn effect due to observations (that is, healthcare personnel perform differently when being observed) because the observer's presence gradually becomes insignificant to the healthcare personnel. In an RCH unit, more than one healthcare personnel provides care to the residents. Observations will be made of the first healthcare personnel to provide direct care to the residents before the other healthcare personnel take action. There will be no interference with the care procedure during the observations.

Data analysis:

To examine the difference in the change in the primary outcome - the observational-based compliance rate for hand hygiene - from baseline to post-intervention between the IG and CG, investigators will perform a linear mixed-effects model with a log link function to control for the clustering effect at the RCH level with Time, Group, and the interaction term (Time x Group) as independent variables. A significant result in the interaction term (Time x Group) will indicate a differential change in the outcome variable between the two groups, and will support hypothesis H1.

To examine differences in the changes in the secondary outcomes, including the observational-based compliance rate with other infection control practices, self-reported compliance, knowledge, and attitude rates (Hypotheses H2 - H5), investigators will perform a separate linear mixed-effects model for each of the secondary outcomes, similar to that for the primary outcome. A significant result in the interaction term (Time x Group) will indicate a differential change in the outcome variable between the two groups.

The investigators will also perform sub-group analyses by demographic and experience data to explore whether the effect of the intervention is homogeneous with respect to the different demographic and experience characteristics of the participants. Specifically, an interaction term, Group x characteristic, will be added to the model to explore the effect of that particular characteristic on the effect of the BGCTs. Further, investigators will also examine a model by adding parameters from the BGCTS (attempts to the video-clips/pictures, the time spent, and the results of each game) as potential factors associated with the outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

188

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthcare personnel who are working in the selected Residential care homes (RCHs)
  2. Able to read Chinese, and
  3. Possess an electronic device (smartphone or tablet) with which to download the BGCTS system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Temporary staff who are about to cease employment, be on maternity leave, or go on a long vacation during the data collection period;
  2. Students or trainees (including nursing students, physiotherapy students, and health-related trainees), because training institutions are responsible for students' training, and such training may affect students' performance;
  3. Volunteer personnel who come to the RCHs at a specific period (for example, to organize activities for the residents during festivals);
  4. Clerical and administrative staff, kitchen staff, security staff, and engineering and facilities management staff;
  5. Ambulance officers who come to the RCHs to take residents to or from hospitals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (IG)
The participants in the IG will receive BGCTS, a blended training programme

BGCTS is a blended training programme integrated with games and short video clips for Residential Care Home staffs to learn the principles of infection control and reinforce actions needed to stop the spread of COVID-19 within the RCHs, and to care for those residents suspected of having COVID-19. The contents of the training will refer to the evidence-based contents from The COVID-19 Risk Communication Package For Healthcare Facilities.

Dosage of the intervention. Staffs are encouraged to learn each topic independently in 15 minutes. It will take a total of 120 minutes to complete all eight topics in 2 weeks. Staffs will attend two 30-minute face-to-face group sessions conducted by research nurse (and the Infection Control Officer of the RCH) to clarify concepts (one per week; after playing the games). Scores and progress bar will be shown to the staff so as a form of motivation to encourage continuous participation in the training.

Active Comparator: Control Group (CG)
Participants in the CG will receive usual care, the infection control briefing given by the Infection Control Officer (ICO) of the RCHs to all staff.
Participants in the CG will receive usual care, the infection control briefing given by the Infection Control Officer (ICO) of the RCHs to all staffs. Usually the briefing is irregular, non-standardized and determined by ICOs, depending on when the ICOs receive the information about infection control practice from Centre for Health Protection of the Hong Kong government. The format and duration of this briefing is determined by the ICO. Some ICOs deliver the infection control information in the form of posters or a written document, and circulate these materials to all staffs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in unobtrusive observational-based compliance rate of infection control practices
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)

Observed infection control practices will be recorded through a software called eRub, developed by PolyU with a Finnish company. eRub comprises two sets of checklists: 1.hand hygiene (HH)2.infection control practice (ICP).

Checklists are constructed based on the WHO's My 5 Moments list and COVID-19 risk communication package for healthcare facilities . The HH activities ( HH opportunities and its duration), will be rated as 'properly performed, performed, improperly performed, or missed performing'. Others infection control practices (eg. respiratory hygiene, disinfecting used surfaces/ equipment etc.), will also be rated. Staff with a rating of 'properly performed' and 'performed' will be classified as 'performed' while others will be regarded as 'not performed'.

The content validity indices for the relevance and adequacy of the eRub items were greater than 0.83 (range, 0.83-1.00), indicating satisfactory content validity.

T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge and attitudes towards respiratory infection (KARI)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)

a 24-item self-administered survey with 12 items about knowledge and 12 items on attitudes. It covers four areas: Clinical burden and the transmission of acute respiratory infection (7 items); Personal protective equipment and hand hygiene (6 items), Facility infection prevention and control policies for acute respiratory infection (6 items), and Influenza vaccination (5 items). The last five items will be omitted because these are not relevant to the COVID-19.

For each knowledge item, respondents will be classified as (1) 'having knowledge' if 'strongly agree' or 'agree' are answered to the positive statements and 'strongly disagree' or 'disagree' to the negative statements, or (2) 'lack of knowledge' if otherwise. For each attitude item, respondents will be classified as (1) 'positive attitudes' if 'strongly agree' or 'agree' are answered to the positive statements and 'strongly disagree' or 'disagree' to the negative statements, or (2) 'negative attitudes' if otherwise.

T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)
Self-reported Infection Control Practice (SICP)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)
a 10-item self-administered survey asking healthcare personnel to indicate whether RCH staffs would always, usually, sometimes, rarely, or never perform the said actions as part of staffs' usual practice . For self-reported infection control practices, 'satisfactory' will be defined as (1) if respondents' answers are either 'always' or 'usually' to the positive statements and (2) 'sometimes', 'rarely', or 'never' to the negative statements, while 'unsatisfactory' will be defined as otherwise.
T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)
Demographic data
Time Frame: T0 (baseline)
Age, employment mode (full time vs part time), professional discipline (doctor, nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, health workers, personal care worker), types of working unit (nursing home, care and attention home, hostel for the elderly, respite services, infirmary care supplement), staff-to-client ratio.
T0 (baseline)
Data on experience
Time Frame: T0 (baseline)
Working experience in residential care homes in terms of years, working experience in other healthcare settings in terms of years, and experience in infection control training (whether the staff member has received any type of infection control training, the date of the last training session, the duration of the last training session, the contents of the last training session).
T0 (baseline)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of log-ins on Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)
Time Frame: T1 (During the intervention: at Week 2)
The number of log-ins to the BGCTS
T1 (During the intervention: at Week 2)
Number of attempts on Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)
Time Frame: T1 (During the intervention at Week 2)
The number of attempts at each game
T1 (During the intervention at Week 2)
Time spent on Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)
Time Frame: T1 (During the intervention at Week 2)
The time spent on each game
T1 (During the intervention at Week 2)
Gaming result on Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)
Time Frame: T1 (During the intervention at Week 2)
The results of each game
T1 (During the intervention at Week 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angela Leung, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)

3
Subscribe