Evaluation of the Exoskeleton ATLAS 2030 as Robot-assisted Physical Therapy to Children With Neuromuscular Diseases

April 6, 2021 updated by: MarsiBionics

Evaluation of the Safety of ATLAS 2030 in the Application of Robot-assisted Physical Therapy to Children With Neuromuscular Diseases Phase I

This study aims to evaluate the safety, usability and acceptability of a motorized mobility assistance exoskeleton. The protocol explores the use of the motorized device during static and dynamic rehabilitation sessions focused on walking and functional activities, with the expectation of evaluating the safety and usability of the device in the population studied. The protocol has been focused on defining how the device can be used appropriately in this population in a safe and effective manner by rehabilitation specialists. The study also aims to assess the safety of clinical staff who implement the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Arganda Del Rey, Madrid, Spain, 28500
        • MarsiCare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Maximum user weight of 35 kg
  • Thigh length (distance from the greater trochanter to the lateral condyle of the tibia) from 24 cm to 40 cm.
  • Leg length (distance from the lateral condyle of the tibia to the lateral malleolus) from 23 to 39 cm.
  • Pelvis width (between greater trochanters) from 24 to 35 cm.
  • Ability to achieve ankle dorsiflexion to 90˚
  • 20º or more hip flessum.
  • 20º or more knee flessum.
  • No allergies to any of the ATLAS materials: cotton, nylon, polyester, polyamide, polyethylene or propylene.
  • Informed consent signed by legal guardians.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of cerebral palsy or neuromuscular disease affecting walking ability at early development stages
  • Stable medical condition with no changes in disease-specific medication in the last 6 months, and additional medication in the last month.
  • Patient being followed according to the recommended standards for his or her illness
  • Ability to maintain, spontaneously or with a brace, the head and trunk while standing and walking.
  • No need for daytime ventilation (have an oxygen saturation and PCO2 with normal ambient oxygen
  • Score on the FAC scale between 1 and 4 points
  • Not being able to walk without assistance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's inability to follow simple instructions and/or communicate discomfort.
  • Invasive or non-invasive daytime ventilation.
  • Orthostatic hypotension.
  • 20º or more hip flessum.
  • 20º or more knee flessum
  • Scoliosis with a Cobb angle of more than 25º that cannot wear a corset during the test.
  • Severe skin injury to the lower extremities.
  • Scheduled surgery (spine, extremities) during the period of the study or surgery performed (spine, extremities) in the last 6 months.
  • History of fracture without trauma.
  • History of traumatic bone fracture in lower limbs or pelvic girdle in the last 3 months
  • Not receiving regular standing rehabilitation sessions.
  • Absence of control of the head or trunk in an upright position without the possibility of wearing a corset during the use of the exoskeleton
  • Refusal of the patient or legal guardian to include the child in the study.
  • Skin problems (diseases, allergies, sensitivity ...) that prevent the use of exoskeleton accessories on the skin of patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
9 treatment sessions will be performed with the ATLAS2030 exoskeleton. The rehabilitation sessions last approximately 90 minutes. Two sessions are scheduled per week, for two weeks.
The participants will perform physical therapy with the ATLSA2030 device, for 90 minutes per session.
Other Names:
  • ATLAS2030
  • ATLAS
  • robot-assisted therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety as number of serious device adverse events
Time Frame: after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Presence of a serious device adverse events where the participant or therapist is involved
after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fall Prevalence [number of falls during the using of the device]
Time Frame: During the use of the device, for 5 weeks
Number of falling events ocurred from the participant or therapist
During the use of the device, for 5 weeks
Skin integrity [number of skin injuries related to the device]
Time Frame: before and after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
skin integrity measured as the number of skin injuries
before and after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Spasticity [Modified Ashworth Scale]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Spasticity registered before and after the use of the device
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Physical evaluation [number of physical injuries detected]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Physical Evaluation as presence of tissue damage
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Muscle Strength [measured with Hand Held Dynamometer in N]
Time Frame: At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Muscle Strength measured at hip, knee and ankle muscles
At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
ROM [measured with goniometer]
Time Frame: At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Range of Movement
At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Functional Mobility [Functional Ambulation Category scale]
Time Frame: At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Functional Mobility with and without the device
At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Distance covered walking [6MWT]
Time Frame: At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
6MWT recorded using the device
At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Device malfunction [as number and type of device malfunction]
Time Frame: During the use of the device, for 5 weeks
Any device malfunction will be recorded
During the use of the device, for 5 weeks
Safety as presence of adverse events or adverse device events
Time Frame: after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Presence of a device adverse events where the participant or therapist is involved.
after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Exercises [measured as time per exercise in seconds]
Time Frame: after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Measured as time per event for at each therapy session.
after each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Transfers [measured as time to carry out the transfers in seconds]
Time Frame: At each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Measured as time to carry out the transfers
At each use of exoskeleton, for 5 weeks
Acceptability [number of participants which discontinue the participation during the trial in relation with the included participants]
Time Frame: At the end of the study, at the 5th week
Measured as abandon ratio
At the end of the study, at the 5th week
Accessibility [number of potential participants in relation with the included participants]
Time Frame: At the end of the study, at the 5th week
Measured as relation between number of participants and number of potential participants which weren't recruited
At the end of the study, at the 5th week
Pain [Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Pain registered before and after the use of the device, by the participant and therapist. The options are from 1 to 6. A higher score means a worse outcome.
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Fatigue [Borg Rating Scale of Perceived Exertion]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Fatigue registered before and after the use of the device, by the participant and therapist. Measured from 0 to 10, being 0 as fully rested and 10 very tired. A higher score means a worse outcome.
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Heart rate [sphygmomanometer]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Number of heart bets per minute
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
System Usability [System Usability Scale]
Time Frame: At the end of the study, 5th week
Measurement of System's Usability measured by the therapist
At the end of the study, 5th week
User perception of the device [QUEST 2.0 and QUEST 2.1]
Time Frame: At the end of the study, 5th week
QUEST 2.0 will be assessed by the therapist, and QUEST 2.1 will be assessed by the participant
At the end of the study, 5th week
Particpant's stability [Functional Reach Test]
Time Frame: At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Functional Reach Test
At the first day, 3rd week and 5th week
Systolic/Diastolic Pressure [sphygmomanometer]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Systolic Pressure and Diastolic Pressure measured with sphygmomanometer (measured in mmHg)
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Breath Rate [number of breaths per minute]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
Number of breaths per minute
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
SpO2 [pulse oximeter]
Time Frame: Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks
SpO2 measured as %
Before and after the use of the device, during 5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Exoskeleton rehabilitation

Subscribe