Dysthymia: Associated Costs, Treatment and Change Process (DFront)

May 31, 2021 updated by: Modum Bad

DepressionForefront: Costs, Treatment and Change Process for Dysthymia

The study evaluates cost and effect of inpatient versus outpatient treatment of dysthymia, as well as investigates the processes through which psychotherapy works in treating dysthymia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Inpatient treatment allows a more intensive treatment and allows the patient to be in a context where it is possible to focus on the processes in therapy with minimal interruption. Outpatient treatment is much less intensive but allows the treatment process to unfold in the context where the patient is experiencing the problems that brought them to therapy. It is not clear which of the contexts will be more effective in alleviating symptoms of dysthymia. Further, as dysthymia is a very costly disease for society it is of interest to know if the two treatments are cost-effective, and which one is the most cost effective.

A great paucity on dysthymia research ha left the psychotherapy field without an understanding of the processes through which dysthymia is changed. This study will investigate the change process through frequent assessments of common factors, psychological processes, symptoms, heart rate variability and cognitive attention bias.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Buskerud
      • Vikersund, Buskerud, Norway, 3370
        • Recruiting
        • Modum Bad
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pål G Ulvenes, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Asle Hoffart, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bruce E Wampold, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria will be liberal and similar to clinical practice criteria at the treatment site: Persistent depressive disorder as defined by the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM5); which includes an International classification of disorders-10 (ICD-10) diagnosis of depression, dysthymia, recurrent depression. unsuccessful previous treatments. living within driving distance from the treatment facilities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current suicidal risk, current psychosis, marked emotional instability (i.e. issues with impulsivity), strong paranoid traits, current problems related to heavy substance abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Inpatient treatment
High intensity high dosage inpatient short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy
EXPERIMENTAL: Outpatient treatment
Low dosage outpatient short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: At assessment, start (12 weeks after assessment) and end (24 weeks after assessment) of therapy, and at one-year follow up (76 weeks after assessment).
Beck depression inventory
At assessment, start (12 weeks after assessment) and end (24 weeks after assessment) of therapy, and at one-year follow up (76 weeks after assessment).
Change in Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Patient health questionnaire
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Change in Cost of living with dysthymia
Time Frame: pre therapy, one-year and 10 years
cost of living with dysthymia, cost-effectiveness of therapy at one-year and at 10 years. Information will be gathered from various registries and combined to a sum of money.
pre therapy, one-year and 10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional psychological processes
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central emotional psychological processes (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, lower is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
cognitive psychological processes
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central cognitive psychological processes (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, lower is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
metacognitive psychological processes
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central metacognitive psychological processes (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, lower is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Common factors-alliance
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central common factors (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, higher is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Common factors-expectations
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central common factors (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, higher is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Common factors-credibility
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central common factors (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, higher is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Common factors-explanation
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of central common factors (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, higher is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7-item (GAD7)
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
resilience
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of resilience (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, higher is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
loneliness
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of loneliness (Modum Process Outcome questionnaire, M-poq. Calculated as mean of scores. Range 1-7, higher is better).
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)
Time Frame: Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy
weekly measures of wellbeing. 14 Items scored 1-5 (Total score from 14-70). Higher score is better
Once every week for the 12 weeks of active psychotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pål Ulvenes, PhD, Modum Bad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Psychotherapy

Subscribe