Motor Asymmetry in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients (MAP-MS)

April 25, 2023 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Project Rational

A better understanding of the causes of physical disability is an important unmet need in progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients. Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients most often present a worsening pyramidal syndrome of lower and, to a lesser extent, upper limbs (Lublin et al., 2014) suggesting a strong corticospinal tract involvement. The systematic high resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging exploration of lesions location and severity, as well as extra-lesional tissue, on pan-medullar and encephalic motor tracts offers the opportunity to better understand the pathological mechanism associated with motor impairment.

Scientific aims

This project will follow a twofold approach. First, the investigators will consider an "inter-patient" approach where independent and absolute Magnetic Resonance metrics for each limb will be related to disability. Second, the investigators will consider an "intra-patient" approach (i.e. comparing differences of Magnetic Resonance metric and of clinical score from the left and the right side in the same patient). For this purpose, progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients with asymmetric motor impairment will be studied. Confronting clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging metric value asymmetries indeed offers the unique opportunity to free oneself from many confounding factors such as genetics, age, duration of disease evolution, acquisition bias, etc. These two approaches will allow us to precisely study the impact of local factors such as Multiple Sclerosis lesions located on motor tracts on motor disability.

Methodology

The investigators propose an observational multicenter cross-sectional and prognostic study. This study will involve two French centers (Rennes, Marseille) and will include a total of 40 progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients with an asymmetrical motor deficit. Twenty sex and age matched controls will be needed to calibrate quantitative Magnetic Resonance imaging (magnetization transfer ratio). Encephalic and pan medullar structural and quantitative Magnetic Resonance images will be acquired at inclusion and clinical follow-up examinations will be performed at inclusion and 24 months. Detailed motor evaluation "per limb" will be performed, including the motor American Society Injury. Association sub-score and upper and lower limbs muscle strength measurements using a dynamometer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital de la Timone, AP-HM
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient population will consist of progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients (both Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis), a population for whom a better understanding of the causes of disability is an unmet need.

Description

  1. - Inclusion Criteria:

    1.1/ Patients:

    • Aged between 18 and 60 years.
    • Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis or Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis as defined by Mac Donald revised criteria in 2017.
    • Expanded Disability Status Scale lower or equal to 8.0, at inclusion.
    • asymmetric motor deficit. The motor deficit asymmetry will be defined by a difference of 3 or more at the American Society Injury. Association motor sub-score per limb between the right lower limb and the left lower limb.
    • No evidence of focal inflammatory activity for at least 3 years (no clinical relapse, no gadolinium enhancement on an Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan and no new T2 lesion)
    • Provided written informed consent according to the Institutional review board approval
    • Affiliated to the French healthcare system.

    1.2 / Controls:

    • Aged between 18 and 60 years, sex and age matched with patients.
    • Provided written informed consent according to the Institutional review board approval
    • Affiliated to the French healthcare system.
  2. - Non-inclusion criteria:

2.1 /Patients:

  • cerebellar Expanded Disability Status Scale sub score higher than pyramidal Expanded Disability Status Scale sub score.
  • Relapse or corticosteroids in the 30 days preceding inclusion.
  • Other neurological diseases.
  • Lack of ability to understand the Institutional review board consent form.
  • Magnetic Resonance contraindications.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
  • Major persons subject to legal protection (legal safeguards, guardianship,curatorship), persons deprived of their liberty

2.2 / Controls:

  • Personal history of central nervous related disease
  • Familial history of Multiple Sclerosis.
  • Personal history of spinal cord injury.
  • Personal history of spondylotic myelopathy.
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging contraindication.
  • Lack of ability to understand the Institutional review board form.
  • Major persons subject to legal protection (legal safeguards, guardianship, curatorship), persons deprived of their liberty
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy Volunteers

Encephalic (about 30 minutes*)

  • lesion location assessment: 3D FLAIR, 3DT1, 3DT2 (standard OFSEP protocol)
  • lesion severity assessment: Axial magnetization transfer imaging (mt0, mt1)
  • tract location assessment: 30 directions diffusion imaging (standard OFSEP protocol)
  • B0 and B1 mapping to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities

    ● Spinal cord (about 50 minutes*)

  • lesion location assessment: cervical and thoracic sagittal T2 TSE (0.7x0.7x2.5mm3), axial cervical MEDIC T2* (0.7x0.7x3mm3), axial thoracic T2 (0.5x0.5x3mm3)
  • lesion severity assessment: Axial magnetization transfer imaging (mt0, mt1, 0.7x0.7x3mm3) on the cervical cord and on the thoracic cord
  • tract location assessment: performed from registration on atlas
  • B0 and B1 mapping to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients

Encephalic (about 30 minutes*)

  • lesion location assessment: 3D FLAIR, 3DT1, 3DT2 (standard OFSEP protocol)
  • lesion severity assessment: Axial magnetization transfer imaging (mt0, mt1)
  • tract location assessment: 30 directions diffusion imaging (standard OFSEP protocol)
  • B0 and B1 mapping to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities

    ● Spinal cord (about 50 minutes*)

  • lesion location assessment: cervical and thoracic sagittal T2 TSE (0.7x0.7x2.5mm3), axial cervical MEDIC T2* (0.7x0.7x3mm3), axial thoracic T2 (0.5x0.5x3mm3)
  • lesion severity assessment: Axial magnetization transfer imaging (mt0, mt1, 0.7x0.7x3mm3) on the cervical cord and on the thoracic cord
  • tract location assessment: performed from registration on atlas
  • B0 and B1 mapping to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities
Global disability will be scored using the Expanded Disability Status Scale score
  • Walking disability will be scored using the 25-foot timed-walked test
  • Arm disability will be scored using the nine-hole peg test
  • American Society Injury. Association motor subscore for each limb
  • The muscle strength using a dynamometer. Two muscle groups will be tested for the upper (elbow flexors and extensors) and lower limbs (hip flexors and ankle dorsiflexion).
  • The Ashworth Scale and the Tardieu Scale to assess spasticity.
  • 6 minutes walking test
  • Fatigue Severity Scale
  • MFIS : Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
link between focal and diffuse damage in motor tract
Time Frame: Baseline
link between focal and diffuse damage in motor tract per side and it functional consequences per limb assessed clinically at baseline
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Link between the asymmetry of functional motor impairment and the asymmetry of structural damage on the motor pathways
Time Frame: Baseline
To study the link between the asymmetry of functional motor impairment and the asymmetry of structural damage on the motor pathways (intra-patient assessment).
Baseline
prognostic value of motor tract focal and diffuse damage on clinical scores variations
Time Frame: 24 months
To study the prognostic value of motor tract focal and diffuse damage on clinical scores variations at 2 years
24 months
link between fatigability, fatigue and analytical disorders
Time Frame: 24 months
To explore fatigability during the 6-minute instrumented walking test (evolution of spatio-temporal parameters: walking speed, step length, cadence; feeling of fatigue) and to study the link between fatigability, fatigue and analytical disorders (strength, spasticity)
24 months
link between fatigue and fatigability and the focal and diffuse impairment of the motor pathways
Time Frame: 24 months
To study the link between fatigue and fatigability and the focal and diffuse impairment of the motor pathways.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis, Secondary Progressive

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

3
Subscribe