Level of Immunity, Neutralization of the COVID-19 Virus and Reinfections in Residents of 2 Migrant Workers' Residences

June 17, 2021 updated by: Epicentre

Determination of the Level of Immunity, Neutralization of the SARS-COV-2 Virus and Reinfections in Residents of 2 Migrant Workers' Residences 10 Months Apart

A previous seroprevalence survey showed very high seroprevalence levels among residents of the two among the residents of the two migrant workers' hostels surveyed, indicating a high level of circulation of the virus SARS-COV-2 during the 1st wave of COVID-19. The constitution of a cohort after the event would be an opportunity to obtain opportunity to obtain answers to crucial questions: duration of immunity, potential reinfections potential reinfections, potential re-clustering. Going back to check the serological status seems feasible, especiallyespecially in the Foyers de Travailleurs Migrants (high probability of finding the participants).

There is an obvious scientific interest around the duration of immunity and reinfections in a population highly exposed during the first wave. Several articles document the decline of IgG antibodies in the months following an infection, but very few infection, but very few evaluate the protective character in the medium term (>=6 months), especially in asymptomatic individuals. We are also concerned about the circulation of We are also concerned about the circulation of new variants and the immunity acquired after infection in residents.

To date, no study on the duration of immunity has been conducted in migrant worker's residences.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile De France
      • Montreuil, Ile De France, France, 93
        • Foyer de travailleurs migrants
      • Villemomble, Ile De France, France, 93
        • Foyer de travailleurs migrants

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

residents of 2 Migrant Workers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All individuals who consented to participate in the 1st study and who consent to participate in this study
  • All individuals 18 years of age or older not residing in the 2 MWRs in July 2020 and permanently living in the MWR since September 2020 who consent to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Unwillingness to provide blood
  • Contraindication to venepuncture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
migrant worker residents
The target population will be the 124 residents in the 2 migrant worker residences who were included in the previous seroprevalence study and those who arrived at the 2 residences since September 1st, 2020
Serological, viral RNA and antigenic test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level and quality of current humoral immune protection in the residents of the two migrant workers' residences
Time Frame: 15 days
To assess the level and quality of current humoral immune protection in the residents of the two migrant workers' residences in Villemomble and Montreuil who were included in the 1st seroprevalence study in July 2020, approximately 10 months later (May 2021)
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunity and protection
Time Frame: 15 days
  • Identify potential reinfections (reported symptoms confirmed by positive PCR tests) or resurgence of symptoms (long COVID) among residents who were seropositive in July 2020
  • Assess the evolution of antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) approximately 10 months after the first test in Sars-CoV-2 seropositive individuals in July
  • To evaluate the neutralizing and therefore protective activity of the re-measured antibodies, and their level of affinity maturation to SARS-COV-2 as well as their efficacy against the mainly circulating variants: B.1.1.7 (UK), B.1.351 (South Africa) and P.1 (Brazil)
15 days
New infections and screening
Time Frame: 15 days
  • Estimate the proportion of infections (reported symptoms and/or positive PCR tests)/exposure to the virus in people newly arrived since September 2020
  • In case of SARS-COV-2 RNA detection, characterize the virus subtype (genomic sequencing)
  • Document the turnover in MWR populations to guide MSF activities in the future
15 days
COVID Vaccination
Time Frame: 15 days
  • Assess the proportion of participants already vaccinated or interested in the future COVID vaccination campaign and document the reasons for those who express doubts or plan to refuse vaccination
  • To evaluate the performance of the LuLISA technique for the response to SARS-CoV-2 N and S proteins
  • To evaluate the performance of a rapid serological test on strip, LuLISA Stripe developed by the Institute Pasteur by comparison to the LuLISA technique
  • To evaluate the performance of a rapid N and S antigenic test on saliva, LuLISA Flash, developed by the Institut Pasteur, by comparing it to the RT-PCR method
  • To evaluate the performance of an alternative antigenic test on saliva with very high sensitivity, LuLISA Stick, developed by Institute Pasteur, by comparing it to the RT-PCR method
  • Evaluate the performance of a rapid molecular RT-LAMP test developed by Institute Pasteur (depending on availability) by comparing it to the RT-PCR method
15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elisabeth POULET, MD, Epicentre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 25, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 811562

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The research team will develop a range of activities to disseminate the study findings. These dissemination activities will be coordinated by MSF and Epicentre. The results will be presented in an internal report and an external report for the Ministry of Health (MoH), the French National Public Health Agency and Institute Pasteur.

An abstract of the findings will be submitted for presentation at a scientific conference, and at least one manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

The findings of the survey will also be used for advocacy purposes, in coordination with community leaders of participating communities.

The results of the survey (lay version of the report), and their possible use for advocacy / communication, will be shared with the staff, resident representatives and residents of the MWRs, whether or not they actually participated in the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS-COV-2

Clinical Trials on Blood and Saliva collection

Subscribe