ALS and Airway Clearance (ALSAC) Therapy (ALSAC)

ALS and Airway Clearance (ALSAC) Is There a Best Therapy for Airway Clearance in Patients With ALS

Patients will receive one of three respiratory therapy interventions for airway clearance assistance: 1) High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) and mechanical insufflation/exsufflation (MIE), 2) HFCWO or 3) MIE. The study period will be six months and include three clinic visits, baseline and follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months, and 6 monthly home visits by the respiratory therapist.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed project includes both the HFCWO and MIE and will capitalize on the specific goals of each therapy and address the problem as a whole rather than piece-meal. The HFCWO aims to mobilize the secretions to the pharynx to allow the patient to expel the secretions. However, many patients diagnosed with ALS are unable to expel the secretions due to atrophied expiratory muscles. The HFCWO device uses a small air compressor with a vest that wraps around the chest to induce airflows to pull secretions from the walls of the airways, thin the secretions and move them up the airways towards the larger airways and pharynx. The MIE, a noninvasive therapy, removes secretions in patients who have an ineffective cough because the peak cough flows are less than 270 L/min. This device applies a positive pressure to the airway and rapidly switches to a negative pressure applied to the airway. The rapid switch between the two types of pressure simulates a natural cough, thus assisting with expulsion of the secretions. Logically, the two mechanisms of action of these devices should work synergistically to produce effective airway clearance to keep the lungs clear, healthy and reduce the risk of infections from stagnant secretions. Respiratory infections are especially serious for patients with ALS because the patient is not able to recuperate from infections as quickly as a person without ALS. The objective is to determine if changing the use of existing respiratory therapy devices can improve the physical and psychosocial health and quality of life for patients diagnosed with ALS and caregivers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas Health San Antonio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 21 and above,
  2. Probable or definite ALS diagnosis,
  3. Peak Cough Flow of <160L/min or complain of issues clearing airway secretions
  4. Caregiver must also consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current use of HFCWO or MIE
  2. Tracheostomy
  3. Congestive heart failure
  4. All contraindications for the HFCWO
  5. Head and/or neck injury that has not been stabilized;
  6. Active hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability;
  7. Uncontrolled hypertension;
  8. Active or recent gross hemoptysis; and
  9. All contraindications for the MIE
  10. History of bullous emphysema;
  11. Known susceptibility to pneumothorax;
  12. Pneumomediastinum; and
  13. Recent barotrauma
  14. Frontal Temporal Dementia (FTD) - suspected or diagnosed . FTD is a form of dementia found in about 20% of Familial ALS. This dementia interferes with the ability to follow commands and follow through with therapies due to forgetfulness.
  15. Patients not able to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation
The HFCWO aims to mobilize the secretions to the pharynx to allow the patient to expel the secretions. However, many ALS patients are unable to expel their secretions due to atrophied expiratory muscles. The HFCWO device uses a small air compressor with a vest that wraps around the chest to induce airflows that pull secretions from the walls of the airways, thin the secretions and move them up the airways towards the larger airways and pharynx.
Other Names:
  • "The Vest"
Active Comparator: Mechanical insufflation/ exsufflation
A noninvasive therapy, removes secretions in patients who have an ineffective cough because their peak cough flows are less than 270 L/min. This device applies a positive pressure to the airway and rapidly switches to a negative pressure applied to the airway. The rapid switch between the two types of pressure simulates a natural cough, thus assisting with expulsion of the secretions.
Other Names:
  • Cough Assist
Active Comparator: High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation and Mechanical insufflation/ exsufflation
The HFCWO aims to mobilize the secretions to the pharynx to allow the patient to expel the secretions. However, many ALS patients are unable to expel their secretions due to atrophied expiratory muscles. The HFCWO device uses a small air compressor with a vest that wraps around the chest to induce airflows that pull secretions from the walls of the airways, thin the secretions and move them up the airways towards the larger airways and pharynx.
Other Names:
  • "The Vest"
A noninvasive therapy, removes secretions in patients who have an ineffective cough because their peak cough flows are less than 270 L/min. This device applies a positive pressure to the airway and rapidly switches to a negative pressure applied to the airway. The rapid switch between the two types of pressure simulates a natural cough, thus assisting with expulsion of the secretions.
Other Names:
  • Cough Assist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Complications Severity
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
A 9-item instrument will be used to record change from baseline to 6 months in respiratory complications. These are scored on a scale from best (no complications) to worst (death due to respiratory complications) throughout the study period. Scores range from 0-9 with a score of a 9 indicating no complications.
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
This outcome is assessed and recorded as a number from 1-5 with 1 indicating the worst outcome (markedly worse) and 5 indicating best outcome (markedly better) since starting the study.
Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donna Gardner, DrPH, University of Texas Health San Antonio

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified participant data will be available in result publication and in summary result reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov

IPD Sharing Time Frame

In a peer review journal post study completion and data analysis

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation

Subscribe