The Effect of Theoretical Knowledge on Resident's Practical Performance in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

October 25, 2022 updated by: Stine Maya Dreier Carstensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The Effect of Theoretical Knowledge on Resident's Practical Performance in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- A Randomized Trial

Musculoskeletal ultrasound( MSUS) is highly operator-dependent and proper training is needed to ensure appropriate use and minimize risk of incorrect image interpretation.To acquire skills in MSUS, it is mandatory to assure training in both the cognitive ability to recognize normal and pathological findings within the images and the psychomotor component of the examination. This study will examine the effect of a novel developed e-learning platform "The Ultrasound LearNing plAtform (ULNA)", on pre- and post-course musculoskeletal ultrasound performance of rheumatology residents. Moreover, to examine the resident's satisfaction with the e-learning platform ULNA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glostrup, Denmark, 2600
        • COPECARE (Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Residents working in Denmark. Participants are required to have a medical license and provide informed consent before inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No informed consent
  2. Existing The Danish Society for Rheumatology (DRS) level 1 or higher.
  3. Participation in prior studies involving musculoskeletal ultrasound training

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: E-learning preparation
Will receive e-learning prior to a hands-on course in musculoskeletal ultrasound
Development of theoretical knowledge using a E-learning platform before attending a hands-on course in musculoskeletal ultrasound
Active Comparator: Conventional preparation
Will receive standard information (time, place etc) prior to a hands-on course in musculoskeletal ultrasound
Attending a hands-on course in musculoskeletal ultrasound with no preparation before course start

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in The Objective Structures Assessment of Ultrasound skills (OSAUS) score in percent between pre- and post-course assessment for the intervention group and the control group.
Time Frame: 1 year
Scale (5-25 points). 25 is the maximum score, i.e. the best score
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference in time used to complete the MSUS examination between the groups.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the times used on the online platform and the performance score
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Participant experience using the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) scale
Time Frame: 1 year
Scale (1-7) 1 = not at all true, 7=very true
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stine Maya Carstensen, MD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases

Clinical Trials on E-learning

Subscribe