Metabolic Balance Study of Apraglutide in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome, Intestinal Failure (SBS-IF) and Colon-in-Continuity (CIC) (STARSnutrition)

June 16, 2025 updated by: VectivBio AG

A Multicenter, Open-label, Metabolic Balance Study to Evaluate the Effects of Apraglutide on Intestinal Absorption in Adult Subjects With Short Bowel Syndrome, Intestinal Failure (SBS-IF), and Colon-in-Continuity (CIC)

The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the safety of apraglutide in adult subjects with SBS-IF and CIC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an international, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety of apraglutide in adult participants with SBS-IF and CIC. The active pharmaceutical ingredient is apraglutide, an investigational glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analogue. The trial consists of an evaluation period of 52 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
      • Clichy, France, 92110
        • Beaujon Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent for this trial prior to any trial specific assessment.
  • Male and female subjects with SBS-IF and CIC, receiving parenteral support (PS), secondary to surgical resection of the small intestine with < 200 cm from duodenojejunal flexure.
  • Subject must require parenteral support (PS) at least 2 days per week and be considered stable.
  • No restorative surgery intended to change PS requirements in the trial period.
  • Age ≥ 18 years at screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Body mass index equal or higher than 30 kg/m^2 at the time of screening.
  • Major abdominal surgery in the last 6 months prior to screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Apraglutide
All participants received apraglutide administered subcutaneously (SC) once weekly for 52 weeks.
Apraglutide is a synthetic peptide analogue of GLP-2 under development for treatment of SBS-IF, which acts as a full agonist at the GLP-2 receptor with in vitro potency and selectivity comparable with native GLP-2.
Other Names:
  • TA799

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time Frame: Day 1 up to approximately 55 weeks

A TEAE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with apraglutide, whether or not related, that occurred or worsened after the dose of apraglutide. A serious TEAE was defined as any TEAE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. Clinically significant changes from baseline in clinical chemistry, hematology, hemostasis, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and urine analysis were reported as adverse events.

Adverse events of special interest (AESI) included injection site reaction, gastrointestinal obstruction, gallbladder, biliary, and pancreatic disease, fluid overload, colorectal polyps, malignancies.

Day 1 up to approximately 55 weeks
Absolute Change in Absorption of Energy Over Metabolic Balance (MB) Periods From Baseline at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48

Applicable to Protocol V3.0 implemented in France (classed as secondary endpoint in Protocol V4.0 [implemented in Belgium]).

The absorption was defined as dietary intake minus output from fecal excretion over a 72-hour MB period at a given analysis time point. Since dietary intake and fecal excretion were measured daily, i.e., up to three measurements may contribute to absorption calculations, the average over all available daily absorption measurements over the 72-hour period were used for analysis.

Baseline and Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Change From Baseline in Actual Weekly Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at Weeks 4, 24, and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52
The sum of daily PS volume (including extra fluids) from weekly PS diary data recorded for the corresponding analysis timepoint was used for analysis.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Actual Weekly PS Volume at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
The sum of daily PS volume (including extra fluids) from weekly PS diary data recorded for the corresponding analysis timepoint was used for analysis.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of at Least 1 Day Per Week of PS From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Participants were considered to have a reduction of at least one day per week of PS from Baseline (incl. extra fluids) if the number of days with PS from weekly PS diary data recorded for the corresponding analysis timepoint was smaller compared to the number of days with PS from weekly PS diary data for Baseline.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Number of Participants Considered Clinical Responders at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and 52
Clinical response was defined as a 20% reduction of PS volume from Baseline. The sum of daily PS volume (including extra fluids) from weekly PS diary data recorded for the corresponding analysis timepoint was used for analysis.
Baseline, Week 24 and 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Enteral Autonomy at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Weeks 24 and 52
Enteral autonomy was defined as a participant not receiving PS for hydration or parenteral nutrition (PN) for calories. Participants may have still receive minimal fluid to maintain patency of the central line or for specific elemental/micro-nutrient needs (e.g., <100 mL fluid for administration of magnesium).
Weeks 24 and 52
Absolute Change in Total Energy in PN From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
PN was defined as PS that includes protein, carbohydrate, fat, vitamins, and/or trace elements.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Relative Change in Absorption of Energy Over MB Periods From Baseline at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48
The absorption was defined as dietary intake minus output from fecal excretion over a 72-hour MB period at a given analysis time point. Since dietary intake and fecal excretion were measured daily, i.e., up to three measurements may contribute to absorption calculations, the average over all available daily absorption measurements over the 72-hour period were used for analysis.
Baseline and Week 48
Absolute Change in Absorption of Macronutrients Over MB Periods From Baseline at Weeks 4 and 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 48
The absorption was defined as dietary intake minus output from fecal excretion over a 72-hour MB period at a given analysis time point. Since dietary intake and fecal excretion were measured daily, i.e., up to three measurements may contribute to absorption calculations, the average over all available daily absorption measurements over the 72-hour period were used for analysis.
Baseline, Week 4 and Week 48
Absolute Change in Urine Volume Over MB Periods From Baseline at Week 4 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 48
Based on average daily urine volume data derived as per balance period calculations.
Baseline, Week 4 and Week 48
Absolute Change in Absorption of Energy Over MB Periods From Baseline at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
The absorption was defined as dietary intake minus output from fecal excretion over a 72-hour MB period at a given analysis time point. Since dietary intake and fecal excretion were measured daily, i.e., up to three measurements may contribute to absorption calculations, the average over all available daily absorption measurements over the 72-hour period were used for analysis.
Baseline and Week 4
Absolute Change in Urinary Electrolytes Over MB Periods From Baseline at Week 4 and Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 48
Since urinary electrolytes data were measured over the 72-hour MB period, the average of all available results were used for analyses for each MB parameter at a given analysis time point.
Baseline, Week 4 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) Total Score at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
The PSQI is a patient-reported questionnaire used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep, over the past month. The PSQI has seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction over the last month. Minimum Score = 0 (better); Maximum Score = 21 (worse). A negative change from baseline represents an reduction in symptoms.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
PGIC v2.0 is a single-item questionnaire using a 5-point verbal rating scale, to assess overall change in the participants status after taking the study drug. Response options range from 2= very much better to -2= very much worse.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Secondary: Patient Global Impression of Treatment Satisfaction (PGI-TS) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Week 24 and Week 52
This form is a single-item questionnaire assessing the participant's satisfaction with the trial medication over the preceding 7 days. Response options range from -2 to 2, very dissatisfied to very satisfied.
Week 24 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Satisfaction With Parenteral Support (PGI-SPS) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
This is a single-item questionnaire assessing the participant's satisfaction with PS over the preceding 7 days. Response options range from -2 to 2, very dissatisfied to very satisfied. A reduction from baseline represents a decrease in satisfaction.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Parenteral Support Impact (PGI-PSI) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
This is a three-item questionnaire assessing the impact of PS on the participant's sleep, daily activities, and quality of life (QoL) over the past 7 days. All questions have response options ranging from 0 to 4, not at all to extremely. A reduction from baseline represents a decrease in symptoms.
Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52
Trough Apraglutide Plasma Concentration (Ctrough)
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
Pre-dose on Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
Mean Plasma Citrulline Level
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tomasz Masior, VectivBio AG

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Short Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Apraglutide

Subscribe