- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04973852
High Intensity Training for Neurological Injury Using Overground Exoskeletons in Inpatient Rehabilitation (HIT Exo IP)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and potential efficacy to implement high cardiovascular intensity training parameters (70-80% heart rate reserve) with the use of overground wearable robotic exoskeletons in an inpatient rehabilitation setting for locomotor recovery.
The second aim is to investigate the potential functional improvements in gait after receiving high-intensity locomotor training with an overground exoskeleton, as measured on the 10-meter walk test and six-minute walk test.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to achieve adequate fit within the exoskeleton
- Diagnosis of CVA or motor incomplete SCI (AIS C or D)
- Sufficient range of motion to attain normal, reciprocal gait pattern, and transition from normal sit to stand or stand to sit
- Intact skin on all surfaces in contact with device and load-bearing surfaces
- Weight <220 pounds
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Spinal instability
- Unhealed limb or pelvic fractures or any condition restricting weight-bearing in limbs
- Diagnosis of other neurological injuries other than CVA or SCI
- Uncontrolled spasticity (≥3 on Modified Ashworth Scale)
- Colostomy
- Decreased range of motion or contractures in legs (>10° at hips, knees, or ankles)
- Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
- Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
- Inability to tolerate standing due to cardiovascular issues or orthostatic hypotension
- Inability to follow 3 step commands
- Severe comorbidities: active infections, heart, lung, or circulatory conditions
- Pressure sores, impaired skin integrity
- Use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory support
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exoskeleton
5 sessions of overground ambulation with wearable exoskeleton where heart rate is monitored over each session.
|
Exoskeleton walking
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Heart Rate Readings Within the Target Zone Achieved During HIT Gait Training Session
Time Frame: During session 1 (about day 2)
|
Heart rate will be monitored continuously and recorded every 5 minutes throughout the session (each session lasts about 60 minutes).
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is maximum heart rate (HRmax) minus resting heart rate (HRrest).
Target HR ranges will be calculated using age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax = 208 - {0.7 * age]) and Karvonen formula (target HRR (70%) = ([0.7 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest) and (target HRR (80%) = (0.8 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest).
The percentage of HRR achieved during the exoskeleton session is calculated as the percentage of HR readings during the session that are within the 70-80% target HR zone.
|
During session 1 (about day 2)
|
|
Percentage of Heart Rate Readings Within the Target Zone Achieved During HIT Gait Training Session
Time Frame: During session 2 (about day 4)
|
Heart rate will be monitored continuously and recorded every 5 minutes throughout the session (each session lasts about 60 minutes).
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is maximum heart rate (HRmax) minus resting heart rate (HRrest).
Target HR ranges will be calculated using age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax = 208 - {0.7 * age]) and Karvonen formula (target HRR (70%) = ([0.7 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest) and (target HRR (80%) = (0.8 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest).
The percentage of HRR achieved during the exoskeleton session is calculated as the percentage of HR readings during the session that are within the 70-80% target HR zone.
|
During session 2 (about day 4)
|
|
Percentage of Heart Rate Readings Within the Target Zone Achieved During HIT Gait Training Session
Time Frame: During session 3 (about day 6)
|
Heart rate will be monitored continuously and recorded every 5 minutes throughout the session (each session lasts about 60 minutes).
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is maximum heart rate (HRmax) minus resting heart rate (HRrest).
Target HR ranges will be calculated using age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax = 208 - {0.7 * age]) and Karvonen formula (target HRR (70%) = ([0.7 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest) and (target HRR (80%) = (0.8 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest).
The percentage of HRR achieved during the exoskeleton session is calculated as the percentage of HR readings during the session that are within the 70-80% target HR zone.
|
During session 3 (about day 6)
|
|
Percentage of Heart Rate Readings Within the Target Zone Achieved During HIT Gait Training Session
Time Frame: During session 4 (about day 9)
|
Heart rate will be monitored continuously and recorded every 5 minutes throughout the session (each session lasts about 60 minutes).
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is maximum heart rate (HRmax) minus resting heart rate (HRrest).
Target HR ranges will be calculated using age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax = 208 - {0.7 * age]) and Karvonen formula (target HRR (70%) = ([0.7 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest) and (target HRR (80%) = (0.8 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest).
The percentage of HRR achieved during the exoskeleton session is calculated as the percentage of HR readings during the session that are within the 70-80% target HR zone.
|
During session 4 (about day 9)
|
|
Percentage of Heart Rate Readings Within the Target Zone Achieved During HIT Gait Training Session
Time Frame: During session 5 (about day 11)
|
Heart rate will be monitored continuously and recorded every 5 minutes throughout the session (each session lasts about 60 minutes).
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is maximum heart rate (HRmax) minus resting heart rate (HRrest).
Target HR ranges will be calculated using age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax = 208 - {0.7 * age]) and Karvonen formula (target HRR (70%) = ([0.7 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest) and (target HRR (80%) = (0.8 * (HRmax - HRrest)] + HRrest).
The percentage of HRR achieved during the exoskeleton session is calculated as the percentage of HR readings during the session that are within the 70-80% target HR zone.
|
During session 5 (about day 11)
|
|
Change in Self Selected Gait Speed as Assessed by the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
During the 10 Meter Walk Test, four marks will be placed on the ground at 0,2,12 and 14 meters.
Subjects will walk a total of 14 meters, where the middle 10 meters (between marks 2 and 12 meters) will be timed and recorded as their gait speed.
Subjects will complete two attempts at their self-selected pace.
The two trials will be averaged and reported as self-selected speed.
The change in self-selected speed will be reported as [(average self-selected speed at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average self-selected speed at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Fast Gait Speed as Assessed by the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
During the 10 Meter Walk Test, four marks will be placed on the ground at 0,2,12 and 14 meters.
Subjects will walk a total of 14 meters, where the middle 10 meters (between marks 2 and 12 meters) will be timed and recorded as their gait speed.
Subjects will complete two attempts at their fastest pace.
The two trials will be averaged and reported as fast gait speed.
The change in fast gait speed will be reported as [(average fast gait speed at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average fast gait speed at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Walking Endurance as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The 6 Minute Walk Test will measure the distance subjects can walk over six minutes.
Subjects will walk along a 100-foot hallway as many times as they can in 6 minutes.
Subjects are allowed to rest as needed; however, the timer continues to run for 6 minutes consecutively, whether they are standing or walking.
The change in walking endurance will be reported as [(total distance walked in 6 minutes at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (total distance walked in 6 minutes at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Seated Dynamic Reach as Assessed by the Modified Functional Reach Test
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The Modified Functional Reach Test measures the maximum distance an individual can reach forward from a seated position.
This will be reported as an average of three trials.
Change in seated dynamic reach is reported as [(average reach distance at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average reach distance at pre intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention))]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Step Length Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average step length (measured in centimeters) will be reported as [(average step length at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average step length at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Stride Length Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average stride length (measured in centimeters) will be reported as [(average stride length at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average stride length at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Single Support Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average time spent in single limb support (measured in seconds) will be reported as [(average time spent in single limb support at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average time spent in single limb at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)] - negative value indicates a reduction in single limb support time post intervention.
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Double Support Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average time spent in double limb support (measured in seconds) will be reported as [(average time spent in double limb support at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average time spent in double limb at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Swing Time Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average time spent in swing phase (measured in seconds) will be reported as [(average time spent in swing phase at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average time spent in swing phase at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Stance Time Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average time spent in stance phase (seconds) will be reported as [(average time spent in stance phase at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average time spent in stance phase at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)]
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters as Assessed by the GAITRite Pressure Map (Heel to Heel Base of Support Time Parameter)
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
The GAITRite pressure map will be used during the 10MWT.
This pressure map will digitally record the subject's footprints' placement and pressure as they walk over it during the 10MWT.
This assessment will indicate several temporospatial gait parameters.
The Change in average heel to heel base of support (measured in centimeters) will be reported as [(average heel to heel base of support at 1 day after session 5 (about day 12)) - (average heel to heel base of support at pre intervention about 1 day prior to intervention)] - a negative values indicates reduction in base of support which indicates improvement in gait.
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Metabolic Expenditure During 10MWT, as Assessed by Oxygen Consumption
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
Change in metabolic expenditure during 10MWT will be indicated by energy expenditure.
Energy Expenditure will be measured by the K4 b2 Cosmed as follows: Oxygen cost will be calculated from oxygen consumption as the product of gait speed and body weight.
Oxygen consumption will be collected on a breath-by-breath basis measured by a portable metabolic system (K4 b2 Cosmed).
Prior to the testing, the system will be calibrated using room air and reference gas mixture.
During the testing, the subject will wear a face mask and a heart rate monitor at all times and will be asked to breathe normally.
The change in oxygen cost from baseline will be reported as VO2 peak during 10MWT.
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
|
Change in Metabolic Expenditure During 6MWT, as Assessed by Oxygen Consumption
Time Frame: Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
Change in metabolic expenditure during 6MWT will be indicated by energy expenditure.
Energy Expenditure will be measured by the K4 b2 Cosmed as follows: Oxygen cost will be calculated from oxygen consumption as the product of gait speed and body weight.
Oxygen consumption will be collected on a breath-by-breath basis measured by a portable metabolic system (K4 b2 Cosmed).
Prior to the testing, the system will be calibrated using room air and reference gas mixture.
During the testing, the subject will wear a face mask and a heart rate monitor at all times and will be asked to breathe normally.
The change in oxygen cost from baseline will be reported as VO2 peak during 6MWT.
|
Pre Intervention (about 1 day prior to intervention) and 1 Day after session 5 (about day 12)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shuo-Hsiu (James) Chang, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Brazg G, Fahey M, Holleran CL, Connolly M, Woodward J, Hennessy PW, Schmit BD, Hornby TG. Effects of Training Intensity on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Oct-Nov;31(10-11):944-954. doi: 10.1177/1545968317731538. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
- Lotter JK, Henderson CE, Plawecki A, Holthus ME, Lucas EH, Ardestani MM, Schmit BD, Hornby TG. Task-Specific Versus Impairment-Based Training on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Jul;34(7):627-639. doi: 10.1177/1545968320927384. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
- Hornby TG, Henderson CE, Plawecki A, Lucas E, Lotter J, Holthus M, Brazg G, Fahey M, Woodward J, Ardestani M, Roth EJ. Contributions of Stepping Intensity and Variability to Mobility in Individuals Poststroke. Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2492-2499. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026254. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
- Holleran CL, Rodriguez KS, Echauz A, Leech KA, Hornby TG. Potential contributions of training intensity on locomotor performance in individuals with chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;39(2):95-102. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000077.
- Holleran CL, Straube DD, Kinnaird CR, Leddy AL, Hornby TG. Feasibility and potential efficacy of high-intensity stepping training in variable contexts in subacute and chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):643-51. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521001. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
- Leech KA, Hornby TG. High-Intensity Locomotor Exercise Increases Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Mar 15;34(6):1240-1248. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4532. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
- Hornby TG, Holleran CL, Hennessy PW, Leddy AL, Connolly M, Camardo J, Woodward J, Mahtani G, Lovell L, Roth EJ. Variable Intensive Early Walking Poststroke (VIEWS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jun;30(5):440-50. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604396. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
- Holleran CL, Hennessey PW, Leddy AL, Mahtani GB, Brazg G, Schmit BD, Hornby TG. High-Intensity Variable Stepping Training in Patients With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018 Apr;42(2):94-101. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000217.
- Moore JL, Nordvik JE, Erichsen A, Rosseland I, Bo E, Hornby TG; FIRST-Oslo Team. Implementation of High-Intensity Stepping Training During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Improves Functional Outcomes. Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):563-570. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027450. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-21-0262
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingInjury, Spinal Cord
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Institut GuttmannNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Traumatic Spinal Cord InjuriesSpain
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
Kessler FoundationNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)United States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of Washington; Baylor Research InstituteRecruitingSpinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)United States
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
Clinical Trials on Ekso
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabU.S. Department of EducationActive, not recruitingSevere Stroke or Similar Neurological Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Ekso BionicsTerminatedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUnited States Department of DefenseActive, not recruitingSpinal Cord Injuries or Similar Neurological WeaknessUnited States
-
IRCCS San Raffaele RomaTerminated
-
Ekso BionicsGlostrup University Hospital, CopenhagenCompletedSpinal Cord InjuryDenmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland
-
Mario WidmerRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Gait Disorders, NeurologicSwitzerland
-
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterCompletedSpinal Cord Injury | Tetraplegia | ParaplegiaUnited States
-
McGuire Research InstituteUnknown
-
University of CalgaryCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesCanada
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingMultiple Sclerosis | Acquired Brain Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States