- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01701388
EKSO Trial: Powered Exoskeleton for Ambulation in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) (EKSO)
Investigational Study of the Ekso Powered Exoskeleton for Ambulation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury (or Similar Neurological Weakness)
This study seeks to test the safety and efficacy of the Esko device in SCI population and in populations with similar neurological weakness to the SCI population. The device can currently stand from a seated position, walk, and turn and sit down. Our hypothesis are as follows:
- Hypothesis 1: We hypothesize that the Ekso subject will significantly improve balance while wearing the device as noted by subject's ability to safely achieve standing balance for 30 sec without loss of balance.
- Hypothesis 2: We hypothesize that the Ekso subject will display improved ability to safely ambulate 10 meters to be assessed using the 10 meter walk test.
- Hypothesis 3: We hypothesize that the Ekso subject will display improved weight shift in both static and dynamic activities as determined by a trained physical therapist.
- Hypothesis 4: We hypothesize that the Ekso subject will verbalize improved success with training of the device as noted by subjective questionnaires that will be assessed following each training session.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is an investigational clinical study trialing the safety and efficacy of the Esko device in the SCI population. Participants with a variety of spinal cord injury diagnoses (e.g. motor complete/incomplete, paraplegia/ tetraplegia) or diagnoses presenting with similar neurological weakness will be included to best determine the criteria for using the Ekso device within this population. The Ekso is an anthropomorphic mobile exoskeleton that is intended for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and mobility. The device is used to drive the patient's lower extremity joints through a desired trajectory in order to obtain a user specified motion.
The device is electrically powered by two motors at the knee and hip joints of either leg of the user. The flexion and extension directions at the hip and knee are only actuated degrees of freedom on the device. The device is equipped with mechanical hard stops at the limits of healthy subject ranges of motion to prevent powering the joint of the user to a position that the joint cannot reach. The device operates using a number of sensors. Some of these sensors are dedicated to maintaining proper function of the mechanical system and some are devoted to determining the user intent while using the device. The user focused sensors are foot pressure sensors at the heel and toe of both feet to determine the forces between the user and the ground at those locations.
The control code in the device behaves by creating an internal estimate of the subject's current position and then coordinating the motion of the four actuated degrees of freedom to take the desired motion. The desired motion is specified through an attached user interface that can be used by the patient or a therapist. The device can currently stand from a seated position, walk, and turn and sit down. In actual operation the device is triggered by one of two modes. The first mode is used early in training where the therapist manually triggers the steps of the user using the graphical interface; for advanced users, the machine interprets their motions to determine when steps are desired and the therapist is only responsible for starting and stopping the motion.
Complete and incomplete SCI patients as well as patients with similar neurological weakness will be recruited from inpatient, day rehab and outpatient clinics. Participants will be scheduled from 1-40 sessions. The amount of sessions provided will be dependent upon compatibility with device, ability to tolerate device use and ability to safely ambulate using the device. A participant will continue with each phase of the study as deemed appropriate by research staff:
- A.Phase 1 (1-3 sessions): To determine if participant is compatible with device use. If participant is not compatible with device the study will stop here. If participant is compatible with device, subject will move into phase 2.
- B.Phase 2 (4-10 sessions): Assessment and training of participant with device to determine safety and efficacy of subject with device. If subject is unsafe with device or does not tolerate device well then the study will stop here. If participant is safe, comfortable and efficient with device, participant will move into phase 3.
- C.Phase 3 (11-40 sessions): Continued training with participant to determine functional ability of patient to use device within a lab or clinical environment.
All testing and training sessions will be under supervision of a licensed physical therapist. Manual assistance or cueing will be provided as necessary for safety and balance. Vital signs will be monitored before and after physical exertion. All subjects will be permitted to stop physical activity or rest at any time during the study. Adverse events will be recorded.
We anticipate this study will help to determine if the Ekso device is a feasible option to initiate ambulation in the motor complete SCI population, motor incomplete SCI population and other similar diagnostic populations unable to ambulate over ground. We do not foresee any potential pitfalls.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants must:
- have a spinal cord injury SCI between C7-S1.
- be between 18-65 years of age.
- be able to physically fit into the exoskeletal device.
- be able to tolerate upright standing for a minimum of 30 minutes.
- have joint range of motion (ROM) within normal functional limits for ambulation.
- have sufficient upper body strength to balance themselves using the walker while wearing the exoskeleton.
- have a different neurological weakness than SCI but fit the other inclusion criteria above
Exclusion Criteria:
- Height below 62 inches or above 74 inches
- Weight above 220 lbs.
- Joint contractures of any extremity that limits normal ROM during ambulation with assistive devices.
- Any medical issue that precludes full weight bearing and ambulation (e.g. orthopedic injuries, pain, severe spasticity)
- Skin issues that would prevent wearing the device.
- Cognitive and/or communicative disability (e.g. due to brain injury). Patients must be able to follow directions well and demonstrate learning capability.
- Significant Osteoporosis: Osteoporosis will be graded based on the T score that indicates a person's bone mineral content and is graded as follows: (14)
T +1: Normal bone density:
- T -1 to -2.5: Low bone density of osteopenia
- T -2.5 to -3.0: osteoporosis
- T <-3.0: Severe osteoporosis
- If the patient has severe osteoporosis and a T score of <-3, participation in the study will be considered based upon their physicians recommendation and overall evaluation of the patient.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ekso Safety and Efficacy
Observational study on the first time use of a robotic exoskeleton.
|
The participants will receive 1 - 40 training sessions.
The sessions will be 1 hour of device use including balance training, gait training and sit to and from stand training with rolling walker and/ or forearm crutches.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test from baseline in distance, rate of perceived exhaustion (RPE), and oxygen uptake
Time Frame: Testing Day 1 - 3 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12.
|
The goal is to cover as much ground as possible over 6 minutes, the distance is measured with a measuring wheel.
The instructions are "Walk continuously if possible, but do not be concerned if you need to slow down or stop to rest."
At the end of 6 minutes the participant is asked to rate their exertion level on a Borg Scale of 6 - 20 points.
The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 MAX) data is collected during the test every 10 seconds
|
Testing Day 1 - 3 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12.
|
|
Change in 10 meter walk test from baseline in gait speed
Time Frame: Testing Day 1 - 3 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12
|
Measure the time in second for and individual to walk 10 meters.
The test is performed using a "flying start," patient walks 10 meters (33 ft) and the time is measured when the leading foot crosses the start line and the finish line.
The instructions are: " Please walk this distance as fast as you safely can when I say go."
|
Testing Day 1 - 3 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ratio of number of steps/walking time
Time Frame: Testing Day 1 - 3 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12.
|
The data will be collected from the Ekso statistics mode [data provided by the machine]
|
Testing Day 1 - 3 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12.
|
|
2 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Testing Day 1 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12
|
Individual walks for 2 minutes and the distance is measured, start timing when the individual is instructed to "Go,"stop timing at 2 minutes, assistive devices can be used and documented from test to test, if physical assistance and/or tethering is required it will be recorded as well.
The test should be performed at the fastest safest speed possible.
|
Testing Day 1 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12
|
|
Walk time to stand time ratio on a particular assistive device
Time Frame: Testing Day 1 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12
|
The data will be collected from the statistics section of the Ekso.
As patients progress from a rolling walker assistive device to the forearm crutches the ratio will be collected and compared to the initial and then final sessions with that particular device.
|
Testing Day 1 and follow up testing Week 6 and Week 12
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale (PIADS)
Time Frame: Day 1- 3 after the first trial of the Ekso, follow up testing on Week 6 and Week 12
|
The PIADS is a 26-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the effects of an assistive device on functional independence, well-being, and quality of life. The PIADS can be used to assess the impact of any assistive device (AD), prosthesis or medical procedure. It can be used to evaluate the impact of ADs over time and to match the devices with consumers. With its excellent psychometric properties, the PIADS fills a missing link in the assessment of ADs as well as in the examination of their acceptance and abandonment. |
Day 1- 3 after the first trial of the Ekso, follow up testing on Week 6 and Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Arun Jayaraman, PhD, RIC/Northwestern
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NU59727
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries or Similar Neurological Weakness
-
Dr Brent McMonagleNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Neurological Conditions | Rehabilitation Exercise
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabU.S. Department of EducationActive, not recruitingSevere Stroke or Similar Neurological Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentStevens Institute of TechnologyCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | Hand WeaknessUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentTerminatedSpinal Cord Injury | Respiratory Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Xijing HospitalUnknownNeurological Rehabilitation | Spinal Cord Injuries | Photobiology | Near Infrared Light IrradiationChina
-
MyomoOrthocare Innovations, LLC; Geauga Rehabilitation Engineering, Inc.CompletedStroke | Spinal Cord Injuries | Brachial Plexus Injury | Neurological DiseaseUnited States
-
MyomoOrthocare Innovations, LLC; Geauga Rehabilitation Engineering, Inc.Active, not recruitingStroke | Spinal Cord Injuries | Brachial Plexus Injury | Neurological DiseaseUnited States
-
Shanghai Changzheng HospitalNot yet recruitingParalysis | Spinal Cord Compression | Metastatic Spinal Tumors | Neurological Deficits
-
The Medical Pavilion BahamasWithdrawnStroke | Neurological Diseases | Spinal Cord Injuries
Clinical Trials on Ekso exoskeleton
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabU.S. Department of EducationActive, not recruitingSevere Stroke or Similar Neurological Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
University of CalgaryCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesCanada
-
The State Academy of Applied Sciences in KoszalinNot yet recruitingGait Analysis in Healthy Subjects
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Gait Disorders, NeurologicUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Texas Woman's University; National Multiple Sclerosis SocietyCompletedMultiple SclerosisUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongHospital Authority, Hong KongCompleted
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew York State Department of HealthCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | InpatientUnited States
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompleted
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabCompleted
-
Kessler FoundationNew Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord ResearchUnknownSpinal Cord InjuryUnited States