- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04983342
Apollo Device for Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)
Apollo Device for Fatigue in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study aims to provide preliminary data on the efficacy and tolerability of the Apollo device in the management of fatigue and pain in patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC).
Apollo is about the size of an Apple Watchand can be worn on the ankle, wrist, or armwith two adjustable fabric straps. Apollo vibrations activate touch receptors in the skin and are perceived as safety signals by the brain resulting in decreased stress, improved recovery, focus, and energy. In addition to the wearable, Apollo is a software system that curates music for the body, rather than for the ears. The scientific principles guiding the use of Apollo and mechanistic understanding of its effects on the body are consistent with the understanding of how music and therapeutic touch effect the body to convey feelings of energy, focus, or relaxation by sending safety signals to the emotional cortex (limbic system) in the brain. Similar to music and touch used to facilitate a healing response in the body, there are no known side effects to this type of therapy.
The PROMIS-Fatigue scale and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Fatigue (FACT-F) are instruments that have been previously validated in multiple diseases and will be used in this study. Preliminary data on indices of pain, use of PRN pain medications, health-related quality of life, sleep, anxiety and depression and tolerability/frequency of use with the Apollo device in MBC will also be evaluated using:
- PROMIS pain scale
- Use of pain medications
- Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using PROMIS-29
- PROMIS Sleep
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
- Usage data from Apollo app
This study aims to identify improvement of fatigue symptoms from baseline after 4 and 8 weeks of Apollo use. Improvements in pain, quality of life, use of PRN pain medication, anxiety and sleep.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Magee Womens Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Metastatic breast cancer diagnosis
- Fatigue score of 4 or greater at last clinic visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not able to read and understand English
- Use of Beta Blockers,
- Use of medications for serious mental illness
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Apollo Armband
Armband that can be worn on the ankle, wrist, or arm with two adjustable fabric straps.
Apollo vibrations activate touch receptors in the skin and are perceived as safety signals by the brain resulting in decreased stress, improved recovery, focus, and energy, combatting fatigue and pain.
|
The Apollo armband is approximately the size of an Apple Watch and can be worn on the ankle, wrist, or arm with two adjustable fabric straps.
Apollo vibrations activate touch receptors in the skin and are perceived as safety signals by the brain resulting in decreased stress, improved recovery, focus, and energy, combatting fatigue and pain.
In addition to the wearable, Apollo is a software system that curates music for the body, rather than for the ears.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fatigue (PROMIS-Fatigue)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Change from baseline to 4 and then 8 weeks as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue scale, which measures the presence of fatigue and its interference with life.
PROMIS-Fatigue includes 6 items with scores 1-5 for each item, total scores 6-30.
Lower scores indicate less fatigue and interference from fatigue.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Fatigue (FACT-F)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Change from baseline to 4 and then 8 weeks as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 40-item, 5 choice/item measure ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much) that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function, 0-160 is the total score with higher scores indicating better QOL, the lower the fatigue symptoms.
The recall period refers to the "past 7 days".
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Degree of Pain
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
The PROMIS Pain scale will be used to measure the degree of pain experienced.
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health.
The Pain Intensity part is a 3-item scale focuses on representing the full range of possible pain intensity using psychometric properties and clinical input, with frequency (never to always) and severity (none to very severe) Likert-type response scales.
The final measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5.
Scores range from 3-15, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.
The pain interference part consists of 6 items ranging 1 through 5 - total scores 6-30.
Higher scores indicate higher degrees of interference with important aspects of life.
The recall period for all pain quality items is the past 7 days.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Use of pain medications
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
The dosage of specific medications will be recorded.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Health Related quality of life (HRQOL)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Quality of Life will be assessed using the the Promis-29.
The Promis-29 is a short form assessment containing four items from each of seven PROMIS domains (Depression, Anxiety, Physical Function, Pain Interference, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities) plus one pain intensity question (0-5 numeric rating scale).
Higher scores indicate greater difficulty and/or poorer quality of life.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Promis Sleep Measurement
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Measure of sleep difficulty by first asking the participant to rate their sleep quality (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good).
Participants are then ask to rate their sleep as, "refreshing; had a problem with sleep; had difficulty falling asleep; sleep was restless, hard to get to sleep, worried about not being able to get to sleep, unsatisfied with their sleep.
Response scale: Not at all, A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much.
Scoring scale is 1-5 (Very poor ,poor, fair, good, very good) Total scores range from 8-45, with higher numbers indicating better sleep.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) assesses both anxiety and depression, focusing on non-physical symptoms so that it can be used to diagnose depression in people with significant physical ill-health.
Self-report rating scale of 14 items on a 4-point Likert scale (range 0-3).
It is designed to measure anxiety and depression (7 items for each subscale).
The total score is the sum of the 14 items, and for each subscale the score is the sum of the respective seven items (ranging from 0-21).
The maximum score is therefore 21 for depression and 21 for anxiety.
A score of 11 or higher indicates the probable presence of the mood disorder with a score of 8 to 10 being just suggestive of the presence of the respective state.
The HADS questionnaire takes 2-5 min to complete and is comprised of seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression, with anxiety and depression questions interspersed within.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Margaret Q Rosenzweig, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HCC 20-243
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.