Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management (PrEdict)

February 13, 2025 updated by: Sascha Treskatsch, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders Used in Clinical Routine During Anaesthesiological Preoperative Assessment and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management

With the help of a standardized questionnaire, an increased risk of bleeding due to pre-existing hemostasis disorders in the site-specific patient population will be detected and the corresponding enhanced diagnostic measures will be initiated. The planned prospective observational study should i.) systematically investigate the results of this procedure and ii.) allow a comparison with a retrospective perioperative cohort that was cared for at the Benjamin Franklin Campus before the introduction of the questionnaire. Due to the campus structure with a large vascular surgery center as well as a large urological, general and trauma surgery department, a high number of multimorbid patients with pre-existing disorders of primary hemostasis, mainly caused by medication or secondary diseases, is to be expected.

In the following, the feasibility of the required measures in clinical routine (measured by the frequency of actual changes or modifications of the initially planned perioperative procedure, the adequate implementation of indicated diagnostic measures, etc.) will be examined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is the systematic scientific evaluation of a standardized questionnaire for bleeding history already used in clinical routine during the preoperative anesthesiological visit and its impact on perioperative coagulation management.

The routine use of a standardized questionnaire to assess bleeding risk is based on a study on the preoperative identification of patients with (primary) hemostasis disorders from 2007: in a patient collective of 5649 patients from different disciplines at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a positive predictive value of 99% for the presence of a hemostasis disorder could be established if at least four questions of a standardized bleeding history questionnaire were answered positively. This is not possible in the same way with the plasmatic coagulation-global tests established in clinical routine.

The standardized application of the questionnaire serves to identify patients at risk of bleeding at an early stage and to adapt and optimize perioperative coagulation management accordingly by initiating targeted diagnostics and therapy. However, a systematic scientific evaluation of this questionnaire with regard to the conditions at the Benjamin Franklin Campus with a large vascular surgery center as well as a large urological, general and trauma surgery department and a high number of multimorbid patients with pre-existing disorders of primary hemostasis, mainly caused by medication or secondary diseases, is still pending.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

5004

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients of both sexes undergoing elective surgery at the Benjamin Franklin Campus in the period of 12 months and presenting at the anesthesiological preoperative assessment will be recorded.

A historical cohort that received surgical care at the Benjamin Franklin campus prior to the introduction of the questionnaire (07/01/2018 - 06/30/2019) will serve as the comparison group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients of both genders undergoing elective surgery at the Benjamin Franklin campus in the 12-month period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, lactation
  • Patients not capable of giving consent
  • Already diagnosed hemostasis disorder
  • Patients under (plasmatic) anticoagulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative frequency of changes in the initially planned perioperative procedure
Time Frame: Perioperative period

The relative frequency of changes in the initially planned perioperative procedure in patients with abnormalities in the preoperative questionnaire and target-oriented laboratory diagnostics will be measured.

Changes can be:

  • need for extended coagulation diagnostics
  • hemostaseological consultation preoperatively
  • administration of coagulation-active substances
Perioperative period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: Perioperative period

Compared to a retrospective control group in which no standardized questionnaire was used, the use of a standardized questionnaire and the targeted diagnostics initiated in case of abnormalities lead to

  • lower blood loss (estimated in ml, qualitatively)
  • a lower transfusion rate during surgery (number of red cell concentrates)
  • less time spent in the recovery room (hours:minutes)
  • a lower rate of revision surgery due to postoperative bleeding (number of patients)
  • fewer organ complications (number of patients, organ failure defined and diagnosed by attending physician)
Perioperative period
Diagnostic discrepancy
Time Frame: Perioperative period

There is a discrepancy between the number of patients, for whom additional diagnostics and measures ,based on the evaluation of the questionnaire,are required on the one hand, and the number ob patients, fo whom these additional diagnostics and measures are actually performed at the time of surgery on the other hand. The relative frequency of these discrepancies should be determined.

Additional diagnostics and measures are:

  • extended coagulation diagnostics
  • hemostaseological consultation preoperatively
Perioperative period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemostasis

Clinical Trials on Bleeding assessment tool

Subscribe