Prognostic Outcome Score in Functional Neurological Disorders (POSiF)

February 27, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Facteurs Pronostiques Des Troubles Fonctionnels Neurologiques : étude rétrospective et évaluation d'un Score

Monocentric retrospective observational cohort study, using a consecutive series of patients hospitalized for FND from 2012 to 2015 in the neurology department A of the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital. During the discharge staff, an estimation of different prognostic factors had been performed in a consensual way by the medical team for all subjects. It is possible to calculate a score (POS) retrospectively from the data collected during the staff. The following items were evaluated on a Likert scale from 1 to 5: quality of adherence to the diagnosis, presence of a current medical treatment, presence of a similar history, duration of evolution of the disorders presented, ability to verbalize, presence of a social adaptation to the disorders, access to psychiatric care.

The aim of the study will be to study the properties of the calculated score according to the evolution of the patients. The investigators will retrospectively collect information from the medical records. In addition, the evolution of the disorder since the initial hospitalization will be analyzed via a self-evaluation by the subjects and the study of the current medical records.

The investigators will also collect information on the quality of life of the patients in the cohort and their perception of the disease at present.

Using a Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) scale on FNDstatus, subjects will be classified into two groups by the two principal investigators (Dr. Vercueil, M. Bratanov): the first with a favorable evolution (disappearance of symptoms at the last follow-up, low health care consumption, favorable self-assessment of health status, persistence of symptoms at a low level of disability, satisfactory social and professional integration), and the second with an unfavorable evolution (persistence of symptoms at a disabling level, high health care consumption, unfavorable self-assessment of health status, lack of social and professional integration, multiple medical consultations). The prognostic properties of the POS score will be then studied in order to establish an ROC curve that will allow to classify patients in the two groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble Cedex 9, France, 38043
        • Chu Grenoble Alpes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients hospitalized in neurology ward from 2012 to 2015 and presenting with FND

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female gender
  • Hospitalization in Neurology Department A from 2012 to 2015 with a final retained diagnosis of NFT
  • POS score at time of hospitalization available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under legal protection
  • Inability to complete a self-questionnaire
  • Minor subjects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical evolution according the Clinical Global Impression scale
Time Frame: continuously through study completion, an average of 1 year
Using a Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) scale on FNDstatus, subjects will be classified into two groups by the two principal investigators (Dr. Vercueil, M. Bratanov): the first with a favorable evolution (disappearance of symptoms at the last follow-up, low health care consumption, favorable self-assessment of health status, persistence of symptoms at a low level of disability, satisfactory social and professional integration), and the second with an unfavorable evolution (persistence of symptoms at a disabling level, high health care consumption, unfavorable self-assessment of health status, lack of social and professional integration, multiple medical consultations)
continuously through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life of each patient
Time Frame: continuously through study completion, an average of 1 year
using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved.All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.
continuously through study completion, an average of 1 year
Illness perception as reported by each patient
Time Frame: continuously through study completion, an average of 1 year

Using the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire(IPQ-R)

Coding:

for identity scale yes = 1; no = 0 for other items: strongly disagree =1, disagree =2, neither agree or disagree = 3, agree = 4, strongly agree = 5

High scores on the identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical dimensions represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to the illness, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness, and the cyclical nature of the condition.

High scores on the personal control, treatment control and coherence dimensions, represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness and a personal understanding of the condition.

continuously through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurent Vercueil, MD; PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 38RC21.167
  • 2021-A01181-40 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire administration

Subscribe