- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05015088
Effectiveness of Gastrocnemius Stretching (Gastroc)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Many studies have assessed the effect of dynamic and passive support of the medial longitudinal arch. The posterior tibial tendon is the main dynamic stabilizer of the medial longitudinal arch, although peroneus/fibularis longus, flexor digitorum longus, and flexor hallucis longus also contribute to a lesser degree. Passive structures also a play role in supporting the arch and include the plantar fascia, plantar ligaments and spring ligament. These plantar structures aid in preventing collapse of the arch during weight bearing.
Several studies have demonstrated that increased tension from the triceps surae can lead to flattening of the arch. Gastrocnemius muscle tightness in particular is thought to be partially responsible for many forefoot and midfoot conditions in non-neurologically impaired patients. Therefore, identifying effective ways to stretch the gastrocnemius muscle without creating increased stress through dynamic structures that support the longitudinal arch may be important for the management of individuals with limited gastrocnemius flexibility.
Common ways to stretch the gastrocnemius include a runner's stretch, stretching with the foot fully supported on a ramp, stretching with the arch of the foot supported on the edge of step and the heel dropping down toward the ground and lastly, stretching with the ball of the foot supported on the edge of a step and the heel dropping down toward the ground. To our knowledge no other studies have assessed the muscle activation of the tibialis posterior muscle via indwelling EMG activation in addition to radiographic measurements to determine the effectiveness of common gastrocnemius stretches. Therefore, the aims of this study are to determine muscle activation of the tibialis posterior muscle during different common gastrocnemius stretches and to radiographically quantify the tibial-calcaneal angle. We hypothesize that stretching over the edge of a step with the arch supported will minimize the activation of the tibialis posterior muscle in addition to increasing the tibial-calcaneal angle more than the other stretching positions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80221
- Regis University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• 20 healthy subjects between the ages of 18 to 65 years old.
Exclusion Criteria:
- any boney or tendinous foot/ankle operative procedure
- diagnosis of neuromuscular disorder
- any previous ankle fracture or degenerative changes that would limit dorsiflexion range of motion
- no obvious gait asymmetries demonstrated through observation
- participants who are pregnant will be excluded from participation in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Gastrocnemius Stretching Group
The study will enroll 20 healthy subjects between the ages of 18 to 65 years old.
Individuals will be recruited from multiple locations.
Exclusion criteria include: any boney or tendinous foot/ankle operative procedure, diagnosis of neuromuscular disorder, any previous ankle fracture or degenerative changes that would limit dorsiflexion range of motion.
Participants must have no obvious gait asymmetries demonstrated through observation.
In addition, participants who are pregnant will be excluded from participation in the study.
|
This study will not include any intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
EMG activation
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
EMG activation of tibialis posterior muscle during 4 common gastrocnemius stretching positions
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
radiographically the angle of the tibia-calcaneus axis and calcaneal pitch between four different common gastrocnemius stretches
|
up to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relationship between foot posture and radiographic evaluation of tibia-calcaneal angle
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Assess if there is a relationship between radiographic stretching position and foot posture
|
up to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephanie Albin, PhD, Regis University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mueller TJ. Acquired flatfoot secondary to tibialis posterior dysfunction: biomechanical aspects. J Foot Surg. 1991 Jan-Feb;30(1):2-11.
- Thordarson DB, Schmotzer H, Chon J, Peters J. Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. A biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jul;(316):165-72.
- Huang CK, Kitaoka HB, An KN, Chao EY. Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle. 1993 Jul-Aug;14(6):353-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400609.
- DiGiovanni CW, Kuo R, Tejwani N, Price R, Hansen ST Jr, Cziernecki J, Sangeorzan BJ. Isolated gastrocnemius tightness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jun;84(6):962-70. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200206000-00010.
- Maeda N, Komiya M, Nishikawa Y, Morikawa M, Tsutsumi S, Tashiro T, Fukui K, Kimura H, Urabe Y. Effect of Acute Static Stretching on the Activation Patterns Using High-Density Surface Electromyography of the Gastrocnemius Muscle during Ramp-Up Task. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;21(14):4841. doi: 10.3390/s21144841.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- COMIRB
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.