Femur Transtrochanteric Fractures Treated With Dynamic Hip Screw and Calcium Sulfate Scaffold. (geneX)

October 12, 2021 updated by: Julio Carlos Velez de Lachica, Hospital Regional Tlalnepantla

Unstable Proximal Femur Transtrochanteric Fractures Treated With Dynamic Hip Screw and ß -Tricalcium Phosphate/ Hemihydrated Calcium Sulfate Graft Scaffold

This is a randomised prospective comparison study to evaluate the incidence of cut - out failure of the dynamic hip screw implant alone compared to the dynamic hip screw adding calcium sulfate through the cervical canal before placing the sliding screw for improvement of the implant stability integration and bone healing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transtrochanteric fractures are a frequent entity, mainly in patients over 65 years old, with low bone density. Most of these fractures of the proximal femur are treated effectively with internal fixation with dynamic hip screw (DHS), nonetheless a conditional factor in the treatment success its in the fracture stability and in the osteoporosis severity.

There is controversy in the treatment decision in patients with osteoporosis and an unstable fracture added the risk of peri-prosthetic infection or increased bleeding during surgery means that the decision to place a DHS versus a prosthesis is debated.

This study represents the first comparison of closed reduction and internal fixation with DHS using calcium sulfate graft versus conventional DHS procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between 65 and 80 years old
  • Patients classified as 31A1.3 and all 31A2 by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stable hip fractures
  • Participants who do not accept the randomization process
  • patients who do not complete follow-up during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study group
Participants in which absorbable graft of tricalcium ß phosphate / calcium sulfate hemihydrate paste at the time of the placement of the hip implant to prevent loosening of it's unstable trans-trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur, were applied.
Application of absorbable graft of tricalcium ß phosphate / calcium sulfate hemihydrate in paste for prevent loosening of Dynamic Hip Screw implant
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants without application of graft during hip implant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of cut - out failure of the dynamic hip screw implant in unstable transtrochanteric fractures
Time Frame: 12 weeks for each patient
The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of cut - out failure of the dynamic hip screw implant alone compared to the dynamic hip screw adding calcium sulfate through the cervical canal before placing the sliding screw to improve implant integration and bone healing.
12 weeks for each patient

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: JULIO C VELEZ, mD, HEAD OF THE ORTHOPEDIC SERVICE OF THE REGIONAL HOSPITAL TLALNEPANTLA ISSEMYM
  • Study Chair: SILVIA S SERRANO REYES, MD, JOINT SURGERY RESIDENT

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proximal Femur Fracture

Clinical Trials on Study group with absorbable graft of tricalcium ß phosphate / calcium sulfate hemihydrate paste

Subscribe