Which Analgesia is Better for Proximal Femoral Fractures?

September 22, 2020 updated by: Mansoura University

- Efficacy of Combined Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block With Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Block in Proximal Femoral Fractures

This patient population is typically elderly and frail. They are at risk of adverse effects secondary to inadequate pain management such as prolonged admissions and poor functional outcomes.

Regional analgesia is preferred due to their opioid-sparing effects and reduction in related adverse effects but The analgesia from these blocks is only moderate and literature suggests that the obturator nerve (ON) is not covered.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of combined lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block with pericapsular nerve group block versus fascia iliaca block for proximal femur surgery.

Fascia iliaca compartment block is a simple technique to manage pain before positioning for spinal anesthesia performance and it constitutes a practical choice for perioperative pain control.

A recent anatomical study confirmed the innervation of the anterior hip by these 3 main nerves, but also found that the AON and FN play a greater role in the anterior hip innervation than previously reported The high articular branches from FN and AON are consistently found between the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and the iliopubic eminence (IPE), whereas the ON is located close to the inferomedial acetabulum.

The ultrasound-guided technique for blockade of these articular branches to the hip, the PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) block reported significantly reduced pain scores compared with baseline. Roy et al 2019 recommended the use of PENG block together with LFCN block as adjunctive to cover the lateral surgical incision.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 050
        • Recruiting
        • Mansoura University, emergency hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sherin A Bakrey, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shimaa A Shalaby, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II and III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Neuromuscular diseases
  • Hematological diseases
  • Bleeding abnormality
  • Coagulation abnormality.
  • Psychiatric diseases.
  • Local skin infection at the site of the block.
  • Local skin sepsis at the site of the block
  • Known intolerance to the study drugs.
  • Body Mass Index > 40 Kg/m2.
  • Multiple trauma patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fascia iliaca block
Patients will receive Fascia iliaca block
A linear probe will be placed in the sagittal plane to the inguinal ligament to obtain an image of "bow-tie sign" formed by the muscle fascias, a spinal needle will be inserted 1 cm cephalad Using an in-plane approach, the fascia iliaca is penetrated, 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% before spinal anesthesia.
Active Comparator: combined LFCN block with PENG block
Patients will receive a combined lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block with pericapsular nerve group block
With the patient supine, the linear probe is placed parallel to the inguinal ligament. LFCN appear as a hypoechoic oval structure between the tensor fascia lata and Sartorius muscles. The needle is inserted in plane. 5 mL of LA is injected. The PENG block will be performed in the supine position. A curvilinear probe will be placed transversely over the anterior inferior iliac spine and then rotated counterclockwise 45 degrees. the ilio pubic eminence, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle will be observed. A spinal needle will be inserted in plane to the plane between the psoas tendon and the pubic ramus. 25 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of performance of Spinal Anesthesia
Time Frame: just before surgery.
Is defined as the time measured from the start of positioning to the completion of the intrathecal bupivacaine injection
just before surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain measurement at rest
Time Frame: immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, where 0 is equal to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
Pain measurement on movement
Time Frame: immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
(attempted hip flexion to 15 degrees).: 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, where 0 is equal to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
Pain measurement during positioning for spinal anesthesia
Time Frame: Just before surgery
visual analog scale (0-10, 0: no pain, 10: worst pain imaginable) during changing position from supine to sitting one
Just before surgery
The severity of postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, where 0 is equal to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
The severity of postoperative pain on movement
Time Frame: immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
(attempted hip flexion to 15 degrees): 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, where 0 is equal to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
immediately and 1 hour at PACU, then in the surgical ward at 2,4,6,8,12,18 and 24 h after surgery.
Time to onset of Sensory blockade
Time Frame: evaluated 15 and 30 min after block administration
cold perception loss in the lateral, anterior and medial part of the thigh (corresponding to lateral femoral cutaneous (LFC), femoral (F) and obturator (O)nerve sensory distributions, respectively)
evaluated 15 and 30 min after block administration
Time to onset of motor block
Time Frame: evaluated 15 and 30 min after block administration
defined as assessment of quadriceps femoris muscle strength by straight leg raise test to 15 degree and classified as follow: +ve =normal power, -ve =motor weakness
evaluated 15 and 30 min after block administration
Duration of sensory block
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours
blockade is defined as the interval between end of injection and complete end of sensory block (score=2)
postoperative 24 hours
Duration of motor block
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours
blockade is defined as the interval between end of injection and complete end of injection and complete recovery of normal motor function (score=0),
postoperative 24 hours
Anesthesiology satisfaction for patient positioning
Time Frame: just before surgery
evaluated as 0=unsatisfactory, 1=satisfactory, 2=good or 3=optimal
just before surgery
heart rate
Time Frame: pre-block, 15, 30 min after block, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5min, 15min then every 30 min till end of surgery
Changes in heart rate
pre-block, 15, 30 min after block, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5min, 15min then every 30 min till end of surgery
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: pre-block, 15, 30 min after block, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5min, 15min then every 30 min till end of surgery
Changes in Mean arterial blood pressure
pre-block, 15, 30 min after block, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5min, 15min then every 30 min till end of surgery
Peripheral oxygen saturation
Time Frame: pre-block, 15, 30 min after block, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5min, 15min then every 30 min till end of surgery
Changes in peripheral oxygen saturation as measured with pulse oximetry
pre-block, 15, 30 min after block, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5min, 15min then every 30 min till end of surgery
Time for first analgesic request
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after surgery
defined as the time period from end of injection to the first time patient requests analgesia postoperatively
Within 24 hours after surgery
Total analgesics received
Time Frame: for 24 hrs after surgery
cumulative consumption of opioids during the first postoperative day
for 24 hrs after surgery
Pruritis
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after surgery
number of patients with pruritis
Within 24 hours after surgery
nausea
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after surgery
number of patients with nausea
Within 24 hours after surgery
vomiting
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after surgery
number of patients with vomiting
Within 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mona A Hasheesh, MD, Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive care,,P
  • Study Director: Eiad A Ramzy, MD, Associate Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive care,

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MFM-IRB, MD.20.02.280

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Yes, Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after completing the study and being accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be accessible to the investigators and PRS administrators with hiding the identifiers for the patients

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proximal Femur Fracture

Clinical Trials on Fascia iliaca block

Subscribe