Damages From Macular Grasping During Vitrectomy Comparing Traditional and 3D Microscope

December 21, 2022 updated by: Anna Rita Daniele, MD

Randomized, Prospective, Descriptive and Comparative Clinical Study of Macular Grasping Damage in Patients Undergoing Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Peeling of the Internal Limiting Membrane, Operated by Traditional Microscope or NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System With Heads-up Display System. A Pilot Study.

Randomized, prospective, descriptive and comparative clinical study. The comparison is between a group of patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole, whose macular peeling is performed using a traditional optical microscope (Leica F40) - control arm, and a group of patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole whose macular peeling is performed by 3D heads-up microscopy system (NGenuity 3D, Alcon) - experimental arm.

It is a blind study for both the operator that collects data and for the statistician.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rovigo, Italy, 45100
        • Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole, whose internal limiting membrane peeling need to be performed
  • Willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent
  • Willing and able to undergo postoperative examinations of the protocol program:
  • ≥ 21 years of age, of both sexes and any race

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ocular trauma or amblyopia.
  • Other ocular pathologies (glaucoma, uveitis, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, macular degeneration, Irvine Gass Syndrome, degenerative myopia, malformation of the optic disc, i.e.: tilted disc, optic disc pit, posterior staphyloma)
  • Multiple procedures programmed during the surgery
  • Pregnancy, lactation or programmed pregnancy during the course of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control arm
patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole, whose internal limiting membrane peeling is performed using a traditional optical microscope (Leica F40)
Patient undergoes VR surgery with visualization using standard operating microscope
Experimental: Experimental arm
patients affected by macular pucker or macular hole whose internal limiting membrane peeling is performed by 3D heads-up microscopy system (NGenuity 3D)
Patient undergoes VR surgery with visualization using heads up display 3D monitor viewed by the operating surgeon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SANFL detection
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Post-surgical analysis of SANFL (Swelling of the Arcuate Nerve Fiber Layer) measured on infrared, blue auto-fluorescence images and OCT images of peripapillary region
2 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative time
Time Frame: during surgery
Mean duration of the surgical procedure
during surgery
ILM staining
Time Frame: during surgery
Number of internal limiting membrane staining procedures necessary
during surgery
ILM grasping
Time Frame: during surgery
Number of ILM grasping attempts.
during surgery
Light
Time Frame: during surgery
Lumen of light used
during surgery
Surgeon ergonomics
Time Frame: during surgery
Number of episodes of both back and neck pain
during surgery
BCVA
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month and 3 months after surgery
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
baseline, 1 month and 3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2997CESC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR Surgery

Clinical Trials on Macular surgery with standard operating microscope

3
Subscribe