MoreMilk Project: Milk Safety and Child Nutrition Impacts of a Training Scheme for Dairy Vendors in Eldoret, Kenya

MoreMilk: Making the Most of Milk

The objective of the MoreMilk trial is to assess the effect of a Training, Certification and Marketing intervention for milk vendors in the informal sector on the safety of the milk sold in the markets and on the nutrition of children in peri-urban areas of Kenya. The intervention is a training scheme for dairy vendors designed to improve the vendors' business skills and increase their capacity to handle milk hygienically and recognize good quality milk. It will also support vendors to adopt marketing strategies and pass on messages to their customers on the role of milk for nutrition and good food handling practices. The intervention consists of a 12hr face-to-face training, followed by quarterly visits where milk safety is tested and results are reported back to the participants. To assess the effect of this intervention on milk safety, and selected health and nutrition outcomes, the study will work with two groups of participants: dairy retailers, referred to as dairy vendors, operating in the informal sector and consumer households that purchase milk from recruited vendors. Dairy vendors will be randomly allocated to receiving the training at the beginning of the study (treatment group) or at the end of the study (control group). A baseline survey will be administered to participating vendors and households, and an endline survey will be conducted 12 months after baseline in the same vendors and households. The vendor baseline and endline surveys will include questionnaire modules on operations, milk handling practices, and business performance. A sample of milk will also be collected to test the microbiological quality and composition of the milk. Vendors will be visited 2 additional times during the 12 months between intervention and endline, to monitor practices and business performance and to collect a milk sample to be tested for microbiological quality and milk composition. The baseline and endline surveys in households will assess milk and food expenditure, milk handling and consumption practices, and a 24hr dietary recall for the index child.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), together with partners, has pioneered an approach to improving the safety of food sold in informal markets by professionalizing informal traders who operate in these markets in low- and middle-income countries. The approach involves training vendors in hygiene and business skills and improving their ability to market products through brand creation, building skills in sales and milk promotion, and/or social marketing. The approach appears sustainable and scalable, but the nutrition and health impacts, though potentially important, have not been evaluated. The objective of the study is to assess the impact of a Training, Certification and Marketing intervention for milk vendors in the informal sector on milk safety and nutrition outcomes in children in urban and peri-urban areas of Kenya.

The study will be conducted in peri-urban Eldoret, Kenya. The study area was selected for its peri-urban status, ongoing urbanization, and high presence of milk markets. The target wards are characterized by neighborhoods with adequate infrastructure and multi-storey buildings and areas with tin-roofed houses and limited access to piped water, sanitation and electricity. Importantly, it is estimated that about 70% (Kenya Market Trust, 2016) of the milk consumed in the study area is sold through the informal dairy vendors-vendors that sell unpackaged or not-formally processed milk-who are the focus of this study.

A two-arm cluster-randomized, non-masked, community-based trial will be used to estimate the effectiveness of the MoreMilk intervention. The RCT aims at answering the following two research questions:

  • Does a "training, certification and marketing" intervention for dairy vendors operating in the informal dairy markets in peri-urban Eldoret improves the microbiological quality (i.e. safety) of the unpacked milk sold in informal markets?
  • Does a "training, certification and marketing" intervention for dairy vendors operating in the informal dairy markets in peri-urban Eldoret increase the natural log of mean dietary adequacy of protein, Ca, and vitamin B12 for children 12-48 months (at baseline) in consumer households?

The study population will include dairy vendors operating in the informal sector (businesses selling unpackaged or not-formally processed milk to individual consumers; this includes raw, boiled and unpacked pasteurized milk) in the study areas and consumer households that purchase most of their weekly milk from those vendors. The unit of randomization is a cluster of at least one vendor and the households consuming milk from those vendors. Clusters are identified using a hybrid approach based on a computer-based algorithm informed by the GPS locations of the informal milk vendors in the target areas. The resulting clusters ensure that vendors in one cluster are located no more than 100 meters from each other and are located at least 200m away from any vendor in a different cluster. Study clusters will be randomly assigned to one of two arms:

  1. Treatment arm: Training, certification, and marketing scheme for milk vendors.
  2. Control arm: Delayed intervention (implemented after endline survey).

Study vendors in the intervention (treatment) clusters will be offered the possibility to participate in a 12-15hr training. Trainings will be offered free of charge. Upon completion of the endline survey, vendors in the control clusters will also be offered the training, which will follow the same format as the one used in the intervention clusters. The training will be offered a few hours per day over 5-days distributed across 3 weeks to accommodate vendors' time constraints, which the investigators expect to be more severe for female vendors. The trainings will be given by business development service (BDS) providers. BDS correspond to a "wide range of non-financial services provided by public and private suppliers (BDS providers) to entrepreneurs to help them operate efficiently and to grow their business with the broader purpose of contributing to economic growth, employment generation and poverty alleviation" (Kimando, 2012). The Kenyan register of BDS providers will be used to identify available BDS providers. The selected BDS will receive a full training course, covering the intervention content and specific teaching methods to be used during the training of vendors.

The study will include 234 vendor clusters (with a minimum number of vendors per cluster of one and a maximum of five), 291 vendors and 932 households at baseline. For the health outcome, the study will be powered to detect a 0.4 standard deviation difference between the natural log of TBC in the treatment and control groups. This equates roughly to a 20 percentage point increase in the proportion of vendors selling milk meeting EAS one year after the intervention, off of a proportion of 37% (based on data collected in peri-urban Nairobi in 2017). For the nutrition outcomes, the study will be powered to detect a change in the natural log of mean dietary adequacy of Ca, protein, and vitamin B12 that corresponds to a daily increase of 75gr of milk (0.5 cups) consumed per child. This is one-third of the median daily milk consumption for children 24-48 months of age in the MilkMarkets data collected in Dagoretti (peri-urban Nairobi) in 2017.

Randomization of vendor cluster to treatment or control arm will be conducted immediately after completion of the baseline surveys for vendors and consumer households, and hence post-consent. After randomization, vendors in clusters allocated to the intervention will be contacted, informed of the training schedules available in their ward, and offered the possibility to attend 1 of up to 3 scheduled training options. Vendors in the control clusters will be informed that they will be given the option to participate in the trainings one year later.

Selection and recruitment of vendors - From the full list of identified clusters, the investigators will randomly select the 234 to meet the study sample size requirements. In each cluster, a minimum of 1 vendor will be recruited.

Selection and recruitment of households - For each participating cluster, the investigators will recruit up to 5 consumer households that meet our inclusion criteria. Each recruited vendor will be given a small advertisement to display in their business/premise advertising the study and inviting interested consumers to register interest to participate in the study by providing their name and telephone number in a registration form. Vendors will be encouraged to bring the study to the attention of their customers. The information will be kept at the vendor's premise for at least 10 days and then collected by field workers. Registered consumers will be contacted and information collected to check their eligibility (see criteria above). If not enough eligible households were identified, a second approach to recruitment will be used. A field worker will spend 2-3 hours in the morning or the evening of a given day at the recruited vendor's premise and approach customers that purchase liquid unprocessed milk during this time period. A brief set of questions will be asked to confirm whether the consumer household meets our inclusion criteria. If it does, the study will be presented and interest to participate in the study will be recorded. Basic contact details will be obtained to facilitate follow up. After identification of all eligible households in the cluster, 5 households will be randomly selected to participate in the study aiming at achieving equal number of household per vendor(whenever there is more than 1 vendor in a cluster) and ensuring there is at least one household per vendor in each cluster.

Selection of the index child - In each recruited household one child 12 months to 48 months of age will be selected. If only one child falls into this age window at the time of baseline, this child will be the index child. In case there are multiple children in the household meeting the age criterion, the index child will be randomly selected manually or by the computer-assisted personal interview software.

A baseline survey and an endline survey will be conducted in recruited vendors and households prior to the intervention (baseline) and 12 months after baseline (endline). The questionnaire to vendors will gather information on the following three elements: (i) milk hygiene and handling practices of daily operations, including sourcing of milk, equipment available and use of quality testing; (ii) business performance, recording milk volumes purchased/sold, expenditures, revenues and cost of equipment; (iii) two domains of women empowerment (based on the Women Empowerment in Agriculture Index) in their business and related household gender dynamics. In addition, two un-announced visits to the participating vendors will be conducted between the intervention and the enline survey, where observable features on milk hygiene and handling will be recorded through a short questionnaire. These two mid-term visits will allow for collection of information on business performance indicators and any unexpected negative consequences from participation in the study. In households, questionnaires will record the following information (i) household milk expenditure; (b) milk consumption, handling and hygiene practices; (c) a 24hr dietary recall for the selected child 12-48 months at baseline; (d) presence of diarrhea in the past 7 days (diarrhea understood as one or more days having at least 3 loose stools/day).

At baseline, endline, and at the 2 unannounced visits, 50ml of milk sold by participating vendors will be bought. Samples will be tested for total bacterial counts (TBC), and enumeration of enterobacteriaceae. For vendors in the intervention clusters, results of the laboratory analysis and feedback on milk hygiene practices will be communicated after each testing (excluding at baseline).

For child dietary assessment, the "multiple-pass" 24hr recall method will be used. This approach uses a special method to help the primary caretaker, usually the mother, of a child remember what was consumed and ensure that enumerators do not miss important information. Using the 24hr form, enumerators review the day's food and drink several times with the primary caretaker of the child. Each time, or "pass" more detailed information is added to the recall form, thus reducing the probability that foods are omitted. A detailed 24hr recall protocol has been developed.

The process evaluation will examine the primary inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes along the program impact pathway to determine the "how" and "why" of program impact. The scope of the process evaluation is limited to providing a qualitative assessment of issues related to program implementation and delivery. A combination of random and purposive sampling techniques will be used for the process evaluation. Quantitative data will be collected through precoded questionnaires. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured continuous observations of program activities, semi-structured individual qualitative interviews with implementation staff and beneficiaries, and group free listing with beneficiaries.

A scientific advisory committee has been set up, formed of 3 individuals external to the research team and to the project partner institutions. The Committee will revise and provide feedback on the study protocol and data analysis. The Committee will select a chair for the duration of the study, who will convene meetings as required based on the outcomes of the monitoring.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1297

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya, 00100
        • International Livestock Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

nclusion Criteria (dairy vendors):

  • Operate in the informal dairy sector (i.e. selling unpacked milk, not-formally processed milk) at least 5 days per week and indicates (at baseline) an intention to remain in the business at least for the next 12 months.
  • Operate a milkbar (i.e. business exclusively selling dairy products and eggs), a shop/kiosk (i.e. licensed for selling other products) or be a street vendor (i.e. not selling in a fixed building structure but in a specific location along the street).
  • Sell milk directly to individual consumers/households.

Inclusion Criteria (households):

  • Buying unpacked milk
  • Meet at least 50% of its weekly milk needs with unpacked milk from a recruited vendor.
  • Have at least one child 12 to 48 months of age at the time of recruitment.

Inclusion Criteria (children):

  • 12 to 48 months of age at baseline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trained vendors

The intervention consists of a Training, Certification and Marketing scheme for dairy vendors operating in the informal sector. This scheme includes a 12hr training offered at the beginning of the study, followed by 2 quarterly visits where milk will be tested for microbiological quality and results will be discussed with participants.

The training will include three main components: (i) milk hygiene and quality; (ii) business skills; (iii) milk marketing.

Trainings will be offered free of charge. The trainings will be given by business development service (BDS) providers, who will be trained through a "training of trainers" ahead of the intervention. Quarterly visits will involve the collection of a milk sample from each participant in the experimental arm in an unannounced visit and results on the microbiological quality of the milk reported back individually and explained to each vendor

The 12hr training will address the vendors (i) knowledge on hygienic handling of milk, preservation and low-cost methods for testing milk safety; (ii) business skills in record keeping, access and management of credit; (iii) milk marketing. On completion of the training and successfully passing an evaluation, vendors will be given a written certificate using a format suitable to be displayed in their premises (i.e. A4 poster, a hat or badge) indicating they have completed the training. The certification will not have legal value. Two quarterly unannounced visits will be conducted to collect a milk sample from the vendors and report back the results of microbiological quality. Vendors will have access to various milk marketing and communication items to be used in their daily operations. The materials will promote milk consumption through marketing focused on messages to consumers related to (i) good milk hygiene practices, (ii) good child nutrition practices, and (iii) household diets
No Intervention: Untrained vendors
Participants in the no-intervention arm will receive the same unannounced quarterly visits, where milk will be sampled and tested for microbiological quality, but results will not be shared with the participants. The participants in this arm will only receive the training upon completion of the endline survey (i.e. when the study is finished)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health outcome: total bacterial count (TBC) per mL of milk sold by vendors
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Total bacterial count represents the number of viable aerobic bacteria present in one mL of milk and reflects the hygienic handling of milk from production to the point of testing. It is a well-established food hygiene indicator and the primary milk safety indicator in the East African Standards for Raw Milk. While it is a good indicator of the sanitary quality of the milk, it does not directly correlate to the presence of pathogens or toxins in a food product. However, food products with high TBC can be reasonably assumed to carry health hazards. Given that the distributions of TBC in food products are highly skew, we will analyze this outcome with an appropriate log transformation, which is likely to be the natural log (which is the most commonly used log transformation when analyzing TBC and the one considered for power calculations in this study) or a stronger fractional power of root.
12 months after baseline
Nutrition outcome: mean dietary adequacy of protein, Ca, and vitamin B12 in children 12-48 months at baseline
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Milk contains protein and calcium and is a good source of vitamin B12. The promotion of milk by vendors in the treatment arm is expected to increase milk consumption in children, but it may also lead to reduced intake of other nutrient-dense foods. We will assess the dietary adequacy of these three nutrients in the overall diet. The outcome will be constructed by first calculating the dietary adequacy for each key nutrient (i.e. protein, calcium, and vitamin B12). Nutrient adequacy is defined as the observed nutrient intake divided by the age-specific nutrient requirement. We will then calculate the mean adequacy across all three nutrients for each individual. We expect the distribution of mean dietary adequacy to be positively skew and we will therefore use the natural log of mean dietary adequacy in the analysis or a stronger fractional power of root, if required
12 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differential treatment effect on total bacterial count in milk
Time Frame: 4, 8 and 12 months after baseline
The difference in the magnitude of treatment effect on total bacterial count over 1 year of monitoring, tested at 3 time points.
4, 8 and 12 months after baseline
Enterobacteriaceae count in milk
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Number of enterobacteriaceae per mL of milk. Enterobacteriaceae group includes coliforms, Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia, among others
12 months after baseline
Child milk intake
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Grams of milk consumed per day
12 months after baseline
Child dietary adequacy
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
mean probability of adequacy (MPA) in micronutrient intake and probability of adequacy of iron, zinc and vitamin A
12 months after baseline
Child acute diarrhea
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Presence of diarrhea in the past 7 days (with diarrhea defined as one or more consecutive days with at least 3 loose stools/day)
12 months after baseline
Mean dimension-specific women's empowerment index-score of vendors
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Mean score in 2 specific domains of empowerment
12 months after baseline
Business profitability
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Change in milk-related monthly profits (revenues minus costs)
12 months after baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dairy vendors milk handling and business practices
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
Proportion of households improving milk handling and business practices
12 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPP1156625_ELD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IDP will be treated in high confidentiality given the sensitivity of the information. Some of the participants in the study may be operating in an ambiguous legal situation and their confidentiality must be preserved both during and after the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Food Safety

Clinical Trials on Training, certification and marketing scheme

3
Subscribe