Brain Skull Deformation as a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Measure

November 3, 2021 updated by: Gisele Sampaio Silva, Federal University of São Paulo

Brain Skull Deformation as a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Measure: Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods.

Background: Although placement of an intra-cerebral catheter remains the gold standard method for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP), there are several limitations to the method. Objectives: The main objective of this study was to compare the correlation and the agreement of the wave morphology between the ICP (standard ICP monitoring) and a new nICP monitor in patients admitted with stroke. Our secondary objective was to estimate the accuracy of four non-invasive methods to assess intracranial hypertension. Methods: We prospectively collected data of adults admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or ischemic stroke (IS) in whom invasive ICP monitoring placed. Measures had been simultaneously collected from the following non-invasive indices: optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), pulsatility index (PI) using transcranial Doppler (TCD), a 5-point visual scale designed for Computed Tomography (CT) and two parameters (time-to-peak [TTP] and P2/P1 ratio) of a non-invasive ICP wave morphology monitor (Brain4care[B4c]). Intracranial hypertension was defined as an invasively measured ICP > 20 mmHg for at least five minutes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 04024-002
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

From a total of 30 patients with invasive ICP monitor evaluated in our hospital between March 2019 and March 2020 (pre-Covid-19), 18 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 60 monitorizations were performed. We included 14 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), one with IS, and three with ICH. All SAH were aneurysmatic, all ICH were hypertensives and the only IS was a cardioembolic malignant middle cerebral artery stroke. There were no side effects from the use of the noninvasive method.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Adult inpatients from a dedicated neurological intensive care unit with ischemic (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke who needed invasive ICP monitoring were prospectively evaluated from March 2019 to March 2020 (before the COVID-19 pandemic).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We excluded patients with chronic neurological diseases (demyelinating diseases, chronic hydrocephalus, pseudotumor brain), suspected brain death, and patients monitored with non-ventricular sensors (e.g., subdural or epidural).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between ICP morphology between a non invasive (Brain4care [B4c]) and a invasive (intraventricular) method
Time Frame: At least 30 minutes for every patient
Parameter of the ICP wave between methods were compared (P2/P1 ratio)
At least 30 minutes for every patient
Comparison between ICP morphology between a non invasive (Brain4care [B4c]) and a invasive (intraventricular) method
Time Frame: At least 30 minutes for every patient
Parameter of the ICP wave between methods were compared (Time-to-Peak)
At least 30 minutes for every patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using Transcranial Doppler
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
We measured the Pulsatility Index using transcranial Doppler (TCD) and calculated a ROC curve to calculate its discriminatory power
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
We measured the ONSD for both eyes and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a non-invasive ICP wave parameter (P2/P1 ratio).
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure

We measured the mean P2/P1 ratio and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension.

We calculated the points in the scale and built a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension

At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a non-invasive ICP wave parameter (Time-to_peak).
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
We measured the mean TTP and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension.
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a 5-point visual scale designed for Computed Tomography (CT)
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
We calculated the points in the scale and built a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

As soon as the data are published, we intend to share it.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on ICP wave morphology comparison between a non-invasive (Brain4care) and a invasive method

Subscribe