- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05121155
Brain Skull Deformation as a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Measure
Brain Skull Deformation as a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Measure: Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 04024-002
- Federal University of São Paulo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult inpatients from a dedicated neurological intensive care unit with ischemic (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke who needed invasive ICP monitoring were prospectively evaluated from March 2019 to March 2020 (before the COVID-19 pandemic).
Exclusion Criteria:
- We excluded patients with chronic neurological diseases (demyelinating diseases, chronic hydrocephalus, pseudotumor brain), suspected brain death, and patients monitored with non-ventricular sensors (e.g., subdural or epidural).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison between ICP morphology between a non invasive (Brain4care [B4c]) and a invasive (intraventricular) method
Time Frame: At least 30 minutes for every patient
|
Parameter of the ICP wave between methods were compared (P2/P1 ratio)
|
At least 30 minutes for every patient
|
|
Comparison between ICP morphology between a non invasive (Brain4care [B4c]) and a invasive (intraventricular) method
Time Frame: At least 30 minutes for every patient
|
Parameter of the ICP wave between methods were compared (Time-to-Peak)
|
At least 30 minutes for every patient
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using Transcranial Doppler
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
We measured the Pulsatility Index using transcranial Doppler (TCD) and calculated a ROC curve to calculate its discriminatory power
|
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
|
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
We measured the ONSD for both eyes and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
|
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
|
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a non-invasive ICP wave parameter (P2/P1 ratio).
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
We measured the mean P2/P1 ratio and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension. We calculated the points in the scale and built a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension |
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
|
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a non-invasive ICP wave parameter (Time-to_peak).
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
We measured the mean TTP and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension.
|
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
|
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a 5-point visual scale designed for Computed Tomography (CT)
Time Frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
We calculated the points in the scale and built a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
|
At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Moraes FM, Silva GS. Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring methods: a critical review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021 May;79(5):437-446. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0300.
- de Moraes FM, Rocha E, Barros FCD, Freitas FGR, Miranda M, Valiente RA, de Andrade JBC, Neto FEAC, Silva GS. Waveform Morphology as a Surrogate for ICP Monitoring: A Comparison Between an Invasive and a Noninvasive Method. Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):219-227. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01477-4. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 03843118.0.0000.5505
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
- Analytic Code
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.