Ventilation and Perfusion Scan in Pulmonary Embolism Following Catheter Directed Thrombectomy Versus Anticoagulation Alone (VQPE)

September 21, 2022 updated by: Gregory Woodhead, University of Arizona

Ventilation and Perfusion Imaging in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Following Catheter Directed Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Conservative Therapy Alone: A Pilot Study

Clinical presentation of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is complex and varied and not uncommonly involves respiratory failure with dyspnea or hypoxia. Patients with persisting signs of respiratory failure despite anticoagulation, may benefit from catheter directed thrombectomy. Additionally, patient who receive thrombectomy are likely to have a lower residual thrombus burden measurable by ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan, and thereby less likely to develop chronic sequela, including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and post PE syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with variable presentation and clinical outcomes. Chronic sequelae including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and post-PE syndrome are common pathologies for patient who survive the already significant inpatient mortality, and have a significant impact on both quality of life and life expectancy. To date, the ELOPE trial is the only study to prospectively compare quality of life (QoL) and dyspnea measures and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) to cardiopulmonary exercise test, revealing worse post-PE syndrome in select populations, however this study is limited to a single arm that received anticoagulation alone. New catheter directed therapies, developed in response to such poor outcomes, provide treatment options for acute PE patients when first line therapies including anticoagulation are contraindicated or have failed.

Long term studies utilizing imaging have shown a majority of patients diagnosed with PE have residual pulmonary thrombi after 6 months, which is likely to be a large contributor to the development of CTEPH. Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans remain the gold standard for detection of both acute and chronic pulmonary embolism and will serve as a primary outcome measure at 6 months post initial treatment. Clinical measures including 6MWD, QoL and dyspnea questionaries will be assessed prior to discharge, and at 1 and 6 months, in order to characterize the development of chronic symptomatology.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85721
        • Recruiting
        • Banner University Medical Center
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael Kendall, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Abdul Khan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tammer El-Aini, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael Insel, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients requiring treatment for acute pulmonary embolism.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >18 years
  2. Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute PE
  3. Echocardiogram, CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) or pulmonary angiographic evidence of proximal filling defect in at least one main or lobar pulmonary artery
  4. Scheduled for PE treatment with catheter directed therapy and systemic anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone per the investigator's discretion
  5. Signs of respiratory failure including a. arterial blood saturation <90%, or b. partial arterial oxygen pressure <60 mmHg, or c. persistent tachypnea with respiratory rates > 20/min

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to be anticoagulated with heparin or alternative therapy
  2. Diagnosis with a minor PE without signs of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction
  3. Known sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents that, in the Investigator's opinion, cannot be adequately pre-treated
  4. Imaging evidence or other evidence that suggests, in opinion of the Investigator, the patient is not appropriate for mechanical thrombectomy intervention (e.g., inability to navigate to target location or predominately chronic clot)
  5. Life expectancy <6 months, as determined by the Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Catheter directed thrombectomy
Thrombectomy
Conservative therapy
Systemic anticoagulation
Conservative therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilation-perfusion mismatch
Time Frame: 6 months
Mismatch on ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy per Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) criteria
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
6-minute walk distance
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
6-minute walk distance
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Up to 30 days
Dyspnea questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 72 hours
up to 72 hours
Dyspnea questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Dyspnea questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Catheter directed therapy

Subscribe