The Science of the Art of Palliative Care

January 29, 2024 updated by: Amber Barnato, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

The Science of the Art of Palliative Care Pilot

This feasibility pilot study is designed to learn whether patients and their care partners (e.g., family members) are willing and able to complete two study visits at Dartmouth College while receiving cancer care at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A feasibility pilot open label, single-arm observational case series of 10 patients with metastatic gastrointestinal and lung cancer patients and 10 care partners. Participants will complete two study visits, separated by approximately 8-16 weeks of usual oncologic care with early integrated specialty palliative care. The palliative care physician will also be a study participant.

Primary Objective: To develop and refine study procedures which can be used in future research in order to further understanding of the mechanisms of action of specialty palliative. Expected products: manual of operating procedures and web-based data collection forms.

Secondary Objectives: To test the feasibility of conducting a mechanism-focused clinical trial of primary palliative care vs. specialty palliative care for advanced cancer patients and their care partners. Expected products: preliminary data demonstrating the feasibility of study procedures sufficient to prove this study design is possible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Patient: has received a diagnosis of advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer within the last 24 weeks (note: advanced GI cancer will likely be pancreatic or colorectal)
  • Care partner: care partner of a patient who has received a diagnosis of metastatic lung or gastrointestinal cancer who has provided consent for study (either with our without functional MRI study visits)
  • Be able to understand study requirements and make an informed decision to participate
  • Be able to speak and read English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy of <8 weeks
  • Known brain metastases
  • Claustrophobia
  • Both patient and care partner refuse to participate in fMRI scan (ie., either patient or care partner must agree to an fMRI scan in order for either to participate)
  • Contraindications to MRI (e.g.: implanted or embedded metal/metal fragments. Metals in the body make the participant unable to undergo an MRI which makes them ineligible for study participation).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Patients and care partners receive specialty primary care and participate in pre- and post- functional MRI scans to measure the effects of the specialty palliative care intervention.
Specialty palliative care, as opposed to primary palliative care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operationalization as measured by the creation of a manual of operating procedures and web-based data collection forms
Time Frame: 6 months
Establish acceptable operating procedures and data collection instruments which can be replicated for future projects.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility as measured by participant interest
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of participants approached and interested in participating
6 months
Feasibility as measured by enrollment number
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of participants approached and enrolled
6 months
Feasibility as measured by willingness to be randomized
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of participants enrolled and willing to be randomized
6 months
Feasibility as measured by procedure completion rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of participants randomized and completed procedures (specialty palliative care, fMRIs, surveys, bio response measurements).
6 months
Feasibility as measured by participant withdrawal rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of participants not completing each study visit and specialty primary care visit
6 months
Tolerability as measured by subjective units of distress scores (SUDS, 0-100)
Time Frame: 6 months
The SUDs Rating Scale, or Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDs) as it is officially known, is used to measure the intensity of distress or nervousness in people with social anxiety. The SUDs is a self-assessment tool rated on a scale from 0 to 100.
6 months
Tolerability as measured by rates of study procedure non-completion.
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of participants not completing each study procedures (specialty palliative care, fMRIs, surveys, bio response measurements).
6 months
Acceptability as measured by response to questions of level of burden.
Time Frame: 6 months
Two closed-ended Likert scale items regarding study burdensomeness. (this investigator-created instrument is in development)
6 months
Acceptability as measured by willingness to recommend study participation to others.
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by the Net Promoter Score - The Net Promoter Score is an index that measures the willingness of participants to recommend a services to others. It is used as a proxy for gauging overall satisfaction with a service. Net Promoter Score (scale from 0 to 10 with 3 groups: promoters for 9-10, passive for 7-8 and detractor for below 6).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amber Barnato, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Specialty Palliative Care

Subscribe