Impact of Solarplast® on Immunity in Active Smokers and Non-smokers

September 22, 2023 updated by: Richard Bloomer, University of Memphis
The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Solarplast treatment on measures of oxidative stress, immune function, skin appearance, and associated measures in 60 men and women, consisting of both cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. The hypothesis is that the Solarplast treatment will reduce oxidative stress biomarkers and favorably impact immune measures and both perceived and quantifiable measures of skin health, in both smokers and non-smokers, with a greater impact observed in smokers. Photographic analyses like the Pear Plus 3D system have been developed for clinical use for monitoring skin health.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Deerland Probiotics and Enzymes has developed a dietary supplement called Solarplast®, which is an organic spinach extract, currently being sold on the market (Solarplast - Deerland Probiotics and Enzymes). It contains a unique mixture of antioxidant enzymes and single antioxidant molecules that work to attack reactive oxygen species (ROS) through chaperone activity. These chaperones are naturally occurring proteins that provide protection from stress, such as ROS, heat, and infection, and can lead to reduced inflammation and alteration in immune function.

Spinach is rich in select vitamins and minerals, such as iron, vitamin A, riboflavin, and lutein-a carotenoid that acts as a natural antioxidant, protecting the body from toxins and ROS. Solarplast is thought to exhibit antioxidant protection against ROS, while also containing photosynthetic complexes with high concentrations of ATP, NADPH, ADP, AMP, NADP, niacin, B12, adenine, and ribose. Therefore, it may provide the components required to scavenge free radicals and mitigate ensuing damage from ROS.

In living cells, ROS such as singlet oxygen (·O), superoxide radical (O2· -), and hydroxyl radical (·OH) are continuously formed as a consequence of normal cellular metabolism and are increased under conditions of environmental stress. Production of ROS in quantities that overwhelm the endogenous antioxidant defense system leads to oxidative stress, and this oxidative stress is strongly linked to the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, including diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

Oxidative stress leads to increases in proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1B and TNF-alpha. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can induce ROS and proinflammatory cytokines. Antioxidants present in spinach may provide some protection against LPS actions.

It is well known that cigarette smoking exacerbates ROS formation and poses a significant pro-oxidant stress in vivo. In one puff of a cigarette, the smoker is exposed to >1015 free radicals in the gas phase alone, with additional exposure in the tar phase equal to >1017 free radicals·g-1. This direct exposure represents only a fraction of the total oxidative stress experienced, as cigarette smoke contributes to further endogenous ROS production mediated through inflammatory and immune processes. ROS formation due to cigarette smoking is thought to contribute to premature skin aging . Carotenoids like lutein in spinach, are believed to help protect skin from this ROS damage. Therefore, treating smokers with antioxidant therapy may not only alter immune function and measures of oxidative stress, but also prove helpful to both perceptions and measures of skin health.

Antioxidant supplementation can also reduce oxidative stress, which is linked to cognitive/mental health. Those who are exposed to high levels of oxidants and who are in a chronic state of oxidative stress (e.g., smokers) may be more susceptible to impaired mental health.

A previous clinical research trial evaluating Solarplast titled "Efficacy of Solarplast for Health and Oxidative Stress, A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study" noted improved antioxidant defense and immunity, as well as improved subjective feelings of health (e.g., decreased irritability, decreased tension and anxiety), and improved self-reported skin health in a sample of smokers and non-smokers. The present study seeks to extend these findings in a larger sample of smokers.

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Solarplast treatment on measures of oxidative stress, immune function, skin appearance, and associated measures in 60 men and women, consisting of both cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. We hypothesize that the Solarplast treatment will reduce oxidative stress biomarkers and favorably impact immune measures and both perceived and quantifiable measures of skin health, in both smokers and non-smokers, with a greater impact observed in smokers. Smoking, causes a decrease in blood flow to skin and dryness along with other adverse effects that can prematurely age skin. As quantifiable measures provide more sound evidence than personal perceptions when evaluating skin treatments, there has been a greater push for more analytical methods in the assessment of skin regimens which include topographical, pigmentation, color, as well as other measures that will be employed in this study via photographical image analysis of subject's facial skin. Photographic analyses like the Pear Plus 3D system have been developed for clinical use for monitoring skin health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38152
        • Center for Nutraceutical and Dietary Supplement Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • body mass index (BMI) between 18-40 kg/m2 (not morbidly obese)
  • if a smoker, smokes at least 5 cigarettes per day for the past 12 months
  • if a smoker, experience occasional mild skin irritations (e.g., rash, dryness, redness, itching, etc.)
  • if non-smoker, not have used tobacco products or any smoked product (e.g., marijuana, cigar, pipe) in the past 12 months
  • if non-smoker, not exposed to regular second-hand smoke (e.g., lives with or works in close proximity to a smoker)
  • no consumption of alcohol-containing beverages within 48 hours of testing
  • no consumption of caffeine-containing beverages within 24 hours of testing
  • without active infection or illness of any kind
  • if female, not be pregnant
  • able to fast overnight (10-12 hours)
  • Not have doctor prescribed immune function or antioxidant nutritional supplements, over the counter medications, or prescription drugs that might impact outcomes (e.g. Vitamin-C, elderberry, ginger, turmeric, quercetin, supplements with "Immun" or have immunity on their label, Immunosuppressives: prednisolone, Azathioprine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Monoclonal antibodies - of which there are many ending in "mab", such as bevacizumab, rituximab and trastuzumab, Anti-TNF drugs such as etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab and golimumab, Methotrexate, Ciclosporin, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, Cyclophosphamide, Leflunomide, Immunotherapies: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Adoptive Cell Therapies, Monoclonal Antibodies, Oncolytic Virus Therapy, Immune System Modulators, etc.)
  • be willing to stop non-prescribed immune function or antioxidant nutritional supplements and over the counter medications (e.g. Vitamin-C, elderberry, ginger, turmeric, quercetin, supplements with "Immun" or have immunity on their label, etc.) one month prior to and through the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Smoker Solarplast
Smoker's assigned to solarplast
100 mg Solarplast delivered in capsules with the carrier of rice dextrin and medium chain triglycerides consumed daily at breakfast for 60 days
Placebo Comparator: Smoker Placebo
Smoker's assigned to placebo
rice dextrin and medium chain triglycerides in capsules consumed daily at breakfast for 60 days
Experimental: Non-smoker Solarplast
Non-smoker assigned to solarplast
100 mg Solarplast delivered in capsules with the carrier of rice dextrin and medium chain triglycerides consumed daily at breakfast for 60 days
Placebo Comparator: Non-smoker Placebo
Non-smoker assigned to placebo
rice dextrin and medium chain triglycerides in capsules consumed daily at breakfast for 60 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma Cytokine Panel
Time Frame: baseline
Cytokines analyzed from plasma for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha
baseline
Plasma Cytokine Panel
Time Frame: after 30 days of treatment
Plasma analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha
after 30 days of treatment
Plasma Cytokine Panel
Time Frame: after 60 days of treatment
Plasama analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha
after 60 days of treatment
Plasma Cytokine Panel on LPS treated whole blood
Time Frame: baseline
LPS treated whole blood analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha
baseline
Plasma Cytokine Panel on LPS treated whole blood
Time Frame: after 30 days of treatment
LPS treated whole blood analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha
after 30 days of treatment
Plasma Cytokine Panel on LPS treated whole blood
Time Frame: after 60 days of treatment
LPS treated whole blood analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha
after 60 days of treatment
Protein oxidation
Time Frame: baseline
Blood sample analyzed for protein oxidation
baseline
Protein oxidation
Time Frame: after 30 days of treatment
Blood sample analyzed for protein oxidation
after 30 days of treatment
Protein oxidation
Time Frame: after 60 days of treatment
Blood sample analyzed for protein oxidation
after 60 days of treatment
Lipid peroxidation
Time Frame: baseline
Blood sample analyzed for lipid peroxidation
baseline
Lipid peroxidation
Time Frame: after 30 days of treatment
Blood sample analyzed for lipid peroxidation
after 30 days of treatment
Lipid peroxidation
Time Frame: after 60 days of treatment
Blood sample analyzed for lipid peroxidation
after 60 days of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: baseline
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
baseline
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 1 week of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
1 week of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 2 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
2 weeks of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 3 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
3 weeks of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 4 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
4 weeks of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 5 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
5 weeks of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 6 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
6 weeks of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 7 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
7 weeks of treatment
Subjects' perceived mental health
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)
8 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: baseline
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
baseline
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 1 week of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
1 week of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 2 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
2 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 3 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
3 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 4 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
4 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 5 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
5 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 6 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
6 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 7 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
7 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived general health and well-being
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)
8 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: baseline
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
baseline
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 1 week of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
1 week of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 2 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
2 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 3 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
3 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 4 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
4 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 5 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
5 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 6 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
6 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 7 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
7 weeks of treatment
Subject's perceived skin health
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)
8 weeks of treatment
Quantitative Skin measures
Time Frame: baseline
A skin report will generated using the 3D Pear Plus system
baseline
Quantitative Skin measures
Time Frame: 30 days of treatment
A skin report will generated using the 3D Pear Plus system
30 days of treatment
Quantitative Skin measures
Time Frame: 60 days of treatment
A skin report will generated using the 3D Pear Plus system
60 days of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Food Logs
Time Frame: baseline
Dietary intake will be reported for the 5 days prior to the study visit
baseline
Food Logs
Time Frame: 30 days of treatment
Dietary intake will be reported for the 5 days prior to the study visit
30 days of treatment
Food Logs
Time Frame: 60 days of treatment
Dietary intake will be reported for the 5 days prior to the study visit
60 days of treatment
Resting blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline
Blood pressure will be measured following a 10 minute rest
baseline
Resting blood pressure
Time Frame: 30 days of treatment
Blood pressure will be measured following a 10 minute rest
30 days of treatment
Resting blood pressure
Time Frame: 60 days of treatment
Blood pressure will be measured following a 10 minute rest
60 days of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Bloomer, PhD, University of Memphis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO-FY2021-416

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Immunity

Clinical Trials on 100 mg Solarplast

Subscribe