Brightening Cream and Lasers in Post-sclerotherapy Hyperpigmentation

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Brightening Creams vs Laser Therapy (QS Nd:YAG 1064nm Laser) in Skin Hyperpigmentation After Sclerotherapy by Objective Measurement: A Randomized Controlled Monocentric Trial

The treatment of leg veins and varicosis with sclerotherapy is one of the most frequently performed medical intervention in the western world. The most common local side effects of this treatment are hyperpigmentations caused by hemosiderin deposition in the skin as well as post inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

Although skin hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy is a common over several months up to years lasting side-effect with a strong aesthetic impact, scanty data exist about treatment options.

Quality-Switched (QS) lasers are efficient in the removal of exogenous and endogenous pigments, such as tattoos as well as epidermal and dermal melanin deposits. The laser light is absorbed by pigment particles, leading to a fragmentation of these particles by a photothermal and photoacoustic effect. Smaller particles can be then phagocyted by macrophages, and transported via the lymphatic system into the lymph nodes. Furthermore, the positive effect of QS lasers in the management of cutaneous siderosis in stasis dermatitis and after sclerotherapy has been described in several cases.

Triple cream including hydroquinone, tretinoin and a topical corticosteroid (eg dexamethasone), is the first line therapy in the treatment of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the efficiency of two well-known depigmentation methods (QS laser and triple cream) for treatment of post sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation, compared with a control group performing no treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Department of dermatology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV
  • Presence of at least 1 postinflammatory hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of adverse events related to short-pulsed laser therapy
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • History of intolerance or allergic reaction to triple cream or one of its ingredients
  • Prior treatment with parenteral gold therapy
  • Inability to understand the study content

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Active Comparator: Laser
Patients will be treated with Quality-switched (QS) Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (MedLite® C6) operating at a wavelength of 1064 nm, fluence range from 2.1 J/cm2 to 8.1 J/cm2 with a 4-6mm spot size.
Active Comparator: Cream
Patients will be treated with a triple brightening cream (Pigmanorm®), applied daily, three times per week for 12 weeks on the lesion. Interruption for 4 days will be adopted in case of irritation/redness. 50+ sun protection cream will be used as well during the treatment period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Equivalence of laser and cream in reducing post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation as assessed by SHI
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Equivalence of laser and cream groups in reducing post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation as assessed by Skin Hyperpigmentation Index (SHI), ranging from 1 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst hyperpigmentation.
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of laser and cream in reducing post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation compared to control group as assessed by SHI
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any reduction of post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation in laser and cream compared to control group as assessed by Skin Hyperpigmentation Index (SHI), ranging from 1 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst hyperpigmentation.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream in reducing post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation compared to control group as assessed by PGA
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any reduction of post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation in laser and cream compared to control group as assessed by 6-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA), based on before-after pictures of lesions assessment, ranging from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Patient's satisfaction related to laser and cream in reducing post-sclerotherapy hyperpigmentation compared to control group
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Any difference of patient's satisfaction between laser and cream compared to control group as assessed by a 9-point anchored visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from -4 to +4, with negative scores indicating a worsening of condition, with 0 indicating no difference and with positive scores indicating an improvement.
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristine Heidemeyer, MD, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-D0062

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperpigmentation

Clinical Trials on QS Nd:YAG laser

Subscribe