Effects and Mechanism of Guided Virtual Reality Autogenic Meditation on ICU Sleep

April 18, 2024 updated by: Hsiao-Yean Chiu, Taipei Medical University

Strategy Establishment of Promoting Sleep Quality and Quantity in Critically Ill Patients: The Effect and Mechanism of Guided-virtual-reality Autogenic Meditation

Background: Sleep disturbance is a common complaint reported by critically ill patients, which may in turn prolong the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and increase the risks of delirium and mortality. Environmental factors, such as noise and light exposures contribute to the development of sleep disturbances in ICU. Hypnotics is the most prescribed treatment for managing ICU sleep; however, it only improves light sleep but not deep sleep, and could not deal with sleep disturbances caused by noise or light exposure.

Purposes: To examine the effects of guided virtual reality autogenic meditation on sleep quality and quantity in critically ill adults as well as the possible mechanism through which they provide this alleviation. We hypothesize that critically ill adults undergoing guided virtual reality autogenic meditation (VR) will experience greater alleviations in sleep disturbances in comparison with participants in the eye masks and usual care control group (UC).

Methods: The three-year, single-blinded randomized controlled trial will employ a three-arm parallel-group design. A total of 120 critical ill adults will be randomly allocated to the VR, Eye masks, or UC groups in a 1:1:1 ratio (40 participants in each group). For the VR group, all participants will experience 30-min, voice-guided autogenic meditation through head-mounted display device at 10 pm for 2 nights (ICU day 2 to day 4). For the Eye masks group, participants will wear eye mask from 10 pm to 7 am for 3 days. For the UC group, they will receive sleep promotion strategies, including reduced light exposure at night, decreased noise, and cluster nursing care during the study period. Primary outcomes are sleep parameters measured by the Chinese version of Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, Chinese version of Pittsburgh sleep quality index, and fitbit with one-lead electroencephalography sensor. Secondary outcomes consist of delirium, moods, and quality of life assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, visual analogue scale for anxiety, pain, stress, EuroQoL-5D, and cognitive function respectively. Measurement time points are the first day of ICU admission, pre-and post-treatment, and the day of 30 and 180 days after ICU discharge. A generalized estimating equation will be used to test research hypotheses.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

Sleep disturbance has affected up to 59% of patients who are admitted into intensive care units (ICUs). Such disturbance has been associated with prolonged ICU length of stay, the occurrence of delirium, increased medical costs. The risk factors related to poor sleep in ICU patients include bright light, artificial/augmented sound, postoperative pain, prior illness status, higher intensity of care, and equipment applications.

To date, pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies have been widely used to relieve poor sleep in ICU. Sedative-hypnotic is the most prescribed treatment for critically ill patients with sleep problems. However, related adverse events reduce their usefulness.

According to the 2018 PADIS guideline of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, sleep disturbance has been listed as one of the critical symptoms that must be recognized in a critically clinical setting. Recently, technology-assisted interventions have been increasingly integrated into critical care. Virtual reality (VR) mediation is a promising technology for free from time and space that provides various contents or games to users. To achieve the goal of precision health, more researchers and health care providers have incorporated high technology into medical and nursing care systems. Thus far, only one randomized controlled trial involving 52 ICU patients investigated the effect of VR meditation (natural scenes and sounds) on poor sleep quality and found that the program significantly decreased wake after sleep onset and increased deep sleep time. Therefore, we aim to develop a new VR-assisted program and to examine its effects on sleep quality and quantity of adults requiring intensive care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 20 years and above.
  • Clear consciousness and able to communicate with Chinese or Mandarin.
  • Expect to stay in ICU for more than 72 hrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The use of invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • Having visual or hearing difficulty
  • Having a medical history of sleep disorder, cognition impairment, psychiatric disorders, or seizures.
  • Having sedation use
  • Having APACHE II over 25

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual reality
Participants will receive virtual reality for 30 minutes before bedtime and then will be placed on an eye mask for a whole night's sleep for consecutive two days or until discharge from ICU. A total treatment dosage of 60 minutes is required.
Adults will receive a virtual reality program 30 min before bedtime and then be placed on an eye mask during their sleep for consecutive 2 nights of ICU stay.
Experimental: Eye masks
Participants will receive eye masks during their sleep for consecutive two days or until discharge from ICU.
Adults will receive a virtual reality program 30 min before bedtime and then be placed on an eye mask during their sleep for consecutive 2 nights of ICU stay.
No Intervention: Control group
The control group only receive routine care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in subjective sleep quality from 1st day and 2th day after ICU admission
Time Frame: The 1st, and 2th night after ICU admission
Subjective sleep quality in ICU is assessed by Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire(RCSQ). The mean of total score is 0-100. The higher score means the better sleep quality.
The 1st, and 2th night after ICU admission
Change of subjective sleep quality before ICU admission and 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Time Frame: The first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Subjective sleep quality is assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality. Index(PSQI). The total score is 0-21. The higher score means the worse sleep quality.
The first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Changes in subjective sleep quality from 1st day and 2th day after ICU admission
Time Frame: The first night and 2th night of ICU stay
Objective sleep quality in ICU is measured by fitbit
The first night and 2th night of ICU stay

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of quality of life from the first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days after ICU discharge
Time Frame: The 1st day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Quality of life is assessed by EuroQol- 5 Dimension(ED-5D). The total score is 0-100.The higher score means the better quality of life.
The 1st day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Delirium occurrence
Time Frame: The 1st to 3th days of ICU admission
Delirium is assessed by Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU).
The 1st to 3th days of ICU admission
Change of heart rate variability
Time Frame: The 1st to 2th days of ICU admission
Heart rate variability is measured by portable ECG recorder and analyzer.
The 1st to 2th days of ICU admission
Change from baseline on anxiety
Time Frame: The 1day (date of enrollment)and up to 30 and 180 days
Anxiety is assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anxiety scoring.The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain(score of 10) .The higher score means the very anxiety.
The 1day (date of enrollment)and up to 30 and 180 days
Electroencephalography
Time Frame: The first day to 3th day of ICU admission
Electroencephalography is measured by Neurosky mindwave mobile 2
The first day to 3th day of ICU admission
Change of stress
Time Frame: The first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days after ICU discharge
Stress is assessed by Visual Analog Scale(VAS) stress scoring.The scale is most commonly anchored by "no stress" (score of 0) and "very stressful(score of 10) .The higher score means the very stressful.
The first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days after ICU discharge
Change of pain
Time Frame: The first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Pain is assessed by Visual Analog Scale(VAS) pain scoring.The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "very painful(score of 10) .The higher score means the very painful.
The first day of ICU admission, 30 and 180 days days after ICU discharge
Change of cognitive function
Time Frame: The 30 and 180 days after ICU discharge
Cognitive function is assessed by MoCA. The total scales is 30. The scale is more than 26 means the patients do not have cognitive impairment.
The 30 and 180 days after ICU discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hsiao-Yean Chiu, PhD, Taipei Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N202104057

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Virtual reality and eye mask

Subscribe