Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions (CAGE-FREEIII)

January 22, 2024 updated by: LingTao, Xijing Hospital

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Coronary restenosis has been one of the main reasons affecting the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With drug-eluting stents (DES), which elutes an antiproliferative drug to the vessel wall and reduces the restenosis rate; however, the incidence of restenosis is still about 10%. The late stent thrombosis and restenosis, with a hazard of nearly 2% per year after implantation, remained a concern and motivated the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB).

DCB angioplasty has the following advantages compared with DES implantation: Firstly, the drug in DCB is uniformly distributed and released; whereas the drug release of DES via stent platform is uneven -85% of the vascular wall is not covered by the stent strut. Secondly, there is no alloy in the vessel after DCB angioplasty, while the coronary stent platform and polymer might cause temporal or persistent inflammatory response leading to intimal hyperplasia. Finally, there is no metal cage restraining vessel motion after DCB, the physiological function of coronary arteries would be maintained.

Studies with the strategy of DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting have demonstrated safety and efficacy for the small-vessel disease. The application of DCB in large vessels with de novo lesions is still to be investigated. The DEBUT study showed that in high bleeding risk patients aimed using only 1-month DAPT, DCB was superior to BMS in terms of MACE [MACE (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or revascularization of ischemia-reperfusion target lesions)] at 9-month follow-up.

However, there is still a lack of evidence comparing the DCB versus DES in large vessels with de novo lesions. The current study aims to investigate if in patients undergoing PCI for de novo stenoses in large vessels, DCB is non-inferior to DES.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

370

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shannxi
      • Xi'an, Shannxi, China, 710032
        • Ling Tao

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18y ≤ age ≤ 80y;
  2. De-novo coronary artery lesions with an indication for PCI;
  3. Target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 70% (visual) or ≥ 50% (visual) with evidence of ischemia;
  4. Target lesion reference vessel diameter (2.5mm-4.0 mm), Length of a single target lesion ≤ 35mm; Total treated lesion length ≤ 60 mm;
  5. Vessels treated ≤ 2; only one DCB/DES is allowed for each target vessel;
  6. ≤ 2 non-target lesions (non-TL) are allowed, and can not be in the same vessel as the target lesion (randomization should be implemented only after the successful treatment of all non-TL);
  7. Patients who are able to complete the follow-up and compliant to the prescribed medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Myocardial infarction (< 7 days);
  2. Heavy thrombotic burden in target vessel;
  3. eGFR < 30ml/min or hemodialysis patients;
  4. Other cardiovascular and cerebrovascular procedures planned within 12 months after index PCI;
  5. Patients with contraindications to antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants or bleeding tendency, history of active peptic ulcer, and stroke within 6 months;
  6. Life expectancy of less than 1 years;
  7. Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing;
  8. Known allergic to medications such as Aspirin, Heparin, antiplatelet drugs, paclitaxel, or contrast; patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic immune diseases;
  9. Chronic total occlusion lesion;
  10. Unprotected left main disease;
  11. Bifurcation lesion requiring 2 stents;
  12. Ostial lesions, distance from left main ≤ 2mm;
  13. Severe calcification or distortion;
  14. Arterial, venous or prosthetic grafts;
  15. In-stent stenosis requiring revascularization (defined as stenosis≥50% by visual or positive functional assessments in any vessel);
  16. Myocardial bridging located at target lesions;
  17. Currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint;
  18. Participants deemed unsuitable to be enrolled by investigators for unable to comply with protocol or other reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Drug-coated balloon
Lepu Paclitaxel coated balloon will be used
Aspirin is required for 3 months be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI.
Paclitaxel is the pharmacologically active substance for anti-neointima. The active drug coating is located on the surface of the balloon, which contains 1.5 μg Paclitaxel per 1 mm2.
Ticagrelor is required for 12 months to be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI.
Clopidogrel is required for 12 months to be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI when Ticagrelor is unfeasible or contradicted.
Active Comparator: Drug-eluting stent
Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents will be used
Aspirin is required for 3 months be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI.
Ticagrelor is required for 12 months to be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI.
Clopidogrel is required for 12 months to be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI when Ticagrelor is unfeasible or contradicted.
The device consists of a balloon-expandable intracoronary drug-eluting stent pre-mounted on the MicroTrac Rapid Exchange stent delivery system. Drug eluting stent is composed of metal stent, primer and drug coating. The Stent is manufactured from a cobalt alloy (MP35N). The strut thickness is 88.9 μm and the length elements is 0.9 mm. The drug coating consists of the zotarolimus and BioLinx polymer (C10/C19/PVP) system. A coating of polymers loaded with zotarolimus in a formulation applied to the entire surface of the stent at a dose of approximately 1.6 µg/mm2 which results in a maximum nominal drug content of 380 µg on the largest stent (4.0 x 38 mm).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Coronary fraction flow reserve (FFR) value
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In segment Late lumen loss (LLL)
Time Frame: 12 months
Key Secondary Outcome
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural success rate
Time Frame: 7 days
Procedural success rate included device success, lesion success and procedural success
7 days
Percentage of lesion segments diameter stenosis (DS%)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Binary restenosis (DS% ≥ 50%)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Target lesion failure (TLF)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
Target lesion failure (TLF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and clinically indicated-target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR)
1, 6, 12 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) defined as all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any clinically and indicated revascularisation)
1, 6, 12 months
Definite/Probable Stent thrombosis rates
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
Stent thrombosis included acute, subacute, late and very late thrombosis
1, 6, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ling Tao, M.D, Ph.D, Xijing Hospital
  • Study Chair: Chao Gao, M.D, Ph.D, Xijing Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Aspirin

3
Subscribe