Evaluation of Methodological and Technical DEvelopmeNts to Improve the Quality and Comfort of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Exam on Voluntary Subjects (EDEN)

September 2, 2022 updated by: Damien MANDRY, Central Hospital, Nancy, France
The EDEN study will make it possible to evaluate one or more development phases (from design to validation through optimization) of a method or a technique on voluntary subjects, in normal or pathological condition.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

720

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • Recruiting
        • CHRU de Nancy
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for all subjects :

  • to be over 18 year-old,
  • to be enrolled in a social security plan,
  • to have underwent a pre-inclusion medical examination,
  • to give a written consent.

Inclusion Criteria for volunteers with pathology :

- person with a pathology characterized by a functional and / or morphological alteration that may have an impact on the data collected (images, physiological signals, ...).

Exclusion Criteria for all subjects :

  • any contraindication to MR examination (active medical device, ferromagnetic foreign body, pregnancy, morbid obesity, claustrophobia, … ),
  • subject under a measure of legal protection,
  • Person who refuses to be informed by a doctor in th event of a fortuitus discovery of an abnormality on the MRI examination requiring additionnal examinations or specific treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All subjects will have an MRI examination
All subjects (healthy and pathological subjects) will have an MRI examination with a component of the MRI system under development.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image quality based on standard imaging quality criteria
Time Frame: 6 months after the last inclusion
The image quality will be appreciated visually at least by a radiologist or a researcher.
6 months after the last inclusion
Signal quality based on standard signal quality criteria
Time Frame: 6 months after the last inclusion
The signal quality will be appreciated visually at least by a radiologist or a researcher.
6 months after the last inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the Signal to Noise Ratio obtained by the component of the MRI system under development and the reference situation.
Time Frame: 6 months after the last inclusion
ignal to Noise Ratio will be measured in arbitrary units.
6 months after the last inclusion
Comparison of the Contrast to Noise Ratio obtained by the component of the MRI system under development and the reference situation.
Time Frame: 6 months after the last inclusion
Contrast to Noise Ratio will be measured in arbitrary units.
6 months after the last inclusion
Comparison of blurring and artefacts obtained by the component of the MRI system under development and the reference situation.
Time Frame: 6 months after the last inclusion
Absence of blurring and artefacts will be assessed by at least one radiologist according to an ordinal scale (1 to 5 ; 1 is the worst score and 5 is the better score).
6 months after the last inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 23, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 23, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-A00243-38

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on MRI examination

3
Subscribe