Evaluation of a Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Contact Lens in Myopes and Hyperopes

This is a single-masked, single-arm, dispensing clinical trial that will evaluate vision, eye health and fit acceptance.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Visual Acuity
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: JJVC Investigational Multifocal Contact Lenses manufactured in senofilcon A C3

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 140
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Florida
    • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32205
      • Vue Optical Boutique
    • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
      • Stam & Associates Eye Care
    • Maitland, Florida, United States, 32751
      • Maitland Vision Center - North Orlando Ave
    • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
      • Tallahassee Eye Center
  • Kansas
    • Pittsburg, Kansas, United States, 66762
      • Kannarr Eye Care
  • Michigan
    • Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States, 48601
      • Birmingham Vision Care
  • New York
    • Manhattan, New York, United States, 10022
      • Eye Associates of New York
    • Vestal, New York, United States, 13850
      • Sacco Eye Group
  • Rhode Island
    • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02888
      • Dr. David W. Ferris & Associates
  • Tennessee
    • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38111
      • Optometry Group, LLC
  • Texas
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77005
      • Vision Optique
    • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75703
      • Tyler Eye Associates

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

1. Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
2. Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
3. Be at least 40 years of age and not greater than 70 years of age at the time of consent.
4. Own a wearable pair of spectacles if required for their distance vision.
5. Be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 6 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration).
6. Either already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire".
7. The subject's distance spherical equivalent refraction (vertex corrected if ≥-4.25 D) must be in the range of -1.25 D to -5.75 D or +0.75 D to +3.25 D in each eye.
8. The subject's refractive cylinder must be ≤0.75 D in each eye.
9. The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50 D.
10. The subject must have distance best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

1. Be currently pregnant or lactating.
2. Have any active or ongoing ocular or systemic allergies that may interfere with contact lens wear.
3. Have any active or ongoing systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. This may include, but not be limited to, diabetes, hyperthyroidism, Sjögren's syndrome, xerophthalmia, acne rosacea, Stevens- Johnson syndrome, and immunosuppressive diseases or any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis).
4. Have any previous, or planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, lid procedures, dacryocystorhinostomy, peripheral iridotomy/iridectomy, cataract surgery, retinal surgery, etc.).
5. Have a history of amblyopia, strabismus or binocular vision abnormality.
6. Use of any of the following medications within 1 week prior to enrollment: oral retinoid, oral tetracyclines, anticholinergics, oral phenothiazines, oral/inhaled corticosteroids. See section 9.1 for further examples.
7. Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops.
8. Have a history of herpetic keratitis.
9. Have a history of irregular cornea.
10. Have a history of pathological dry eye.
11. Have Participated in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
12. Be and employee or immediate family member of an employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician).
13. Have any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to non-preserved rewetting drop solutions or sodium fluorescein.
14. Have clinically significant (Grade 2 or greater) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection, or any other corneal or ocular abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
15. Have any current ocular infection or inflammation.
16. Have any current ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TEST Lens; Eligible subjects who are habitual soft contact lens wearers will be given the TEST Lens for the duration of the study.	Device: JJVC Investigational Multifocal Contact Lenses manufactured in senofilcon A C3; TEST Lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Binocular logMAR Visual Acuity	Binocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale under high luminance high contrast condition. At distance (4 meters), VA is assessed using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts; while near (40 cm) and intermediate (64 cm) assessments were made using reduced Guillon-Poling charts. Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. LogMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.	1-Week Follow-up
CLUE Vision Score	Subjective vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each sphere stratum (Hyperope and Myope) was reported.	1-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Eyes With Unacceptable Lens Fitting	Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope post lens insertion, the 1-week follow-up and any unscheduled visits. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The proportion of eyes with unacceptable lens fit was reported.	Up to 1-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings	Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 1-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported.	Up to 1-Week Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
CLUE Vision Score	Subjective vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each sphere stratum (Hyperope and Myope) was reported.	1-Week Follow-up
CLUE Comfort Score	Subjective comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE comfort score was reported. The pre-specified aim was not to compare comfort between the hyperope and myope subgroups, therefore, comfort scores were reported for both groups combined.	1-Week Follow-up
CLUE Handling Score	Subjective Handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE handling score was reported. The pre-specified aim was not to compare comfort between the hyperope and myope subgroups, therefore, comfort scores were reported for both groups combined.	1-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Subject Achieving Optimal Lens Pair in 4 Lenses or Less	The number of lenses to achieve the optimal pair for each subject was calculated as the original pair (2) plus all the required modifications to reach the optimal pair. In this study the minimum number of lenses per subject used was 2 where the maximum possible number of lenses used was 10. The data was dichotomized as Y=1 if the subject was able to achieve optimal lens pair in 4 lenses or lenses or less and 0 otherwise. A lens modification was performed if the subject reports unsatisfactory vision or was unable to obtain 20/30 distance visual acuity in both eyes. If the subject reported satisfactory vision with the lenses a modification was not required. However, based upon the investigator's findings on the measured visual acuity and/or over- refraction a modification may have been performed.	Up to 1-Week Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 6, 2022
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 28, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 4, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 31, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): February 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 13, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 12, 2023
• Last Verified: April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: CR-6477

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: Yes