Computed Tomography-Guided Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia (InEurHeart)

May 19, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Computed Tomography-Guided Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia (InEurHeart Study)

This double arm randomized study will compare 2 ventricular tachycardia ablation strategies: the standard strategy based on invasive substrate and VT mapping with 3D electro-anatomical system vs a tailored strategy which identifies targets based on pre-procedural CT-scan imaging. The primary endpoint will be procedure duration and secondary endpoints will include safety and efficacy criteria as well as medico-economic evaluation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ventricular tachycardia ablation is a non-drug alternative for patients with recurrent VT and ischemic cardiomyopathy with a class 1 indication in the latest guidelines. However, it is poorly standardised and reserved to expert centres. Proof of concept studies have demonstrated that image-guided VT ablation is feasible, and that it may improve the efficiency of VT ablation.

Ablation strategy no longer relying on intracardiac 2-dimensional surface catheter measurements for target identification, but on 3- dimensional pre-operative images of the myocardium acquired by computed tomography (CT) would shorten the procedure, make it more reproducible and less dependent of the operator's experience without altering efficacy.

This randomized study will compare VT ablation based on substrate/VT isthmus identification via intracardiac catheter vs identification via pre-procedural CT-scan. Ablation will be performed with the same material.

Primary endpoint will be procedure duration. Secondary endpoints will compare efficacy and safety of both strategies as well as cost-effectiveness.

Expected results are a reduction procedure duration, without alteration of the efficacy for the CT-guided procedure with an improved medico-economic evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

119

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria
        • Medical University of Graz
      • Linz, Austria
        • Public Hospital Elisabethinen Linz
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
      • Limoges, France
        • CHU de LImoges
      • Paris, France
        • APHP Salpétrière
      • Pessac, France
        • CHU de Bordeaux
      • Toulouse, France
        • CHU de Toulouse
      • Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
        • Rhön-Klinikum AG
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Asklepios Klinik St. Georg Hamburg
      • München, Germany
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum München
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 23538
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Vaudois University Hospital, Lausanne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years,
  • Indication for catheter ablation intervention with planned preoperative cardiac CT scan
  • Prior myocardial infarction (using the international definition of MI: Q waves or imaging evidence of regional myocardial akinesis/thinning in the absence of a non- ischemic cause with documentation of prior ischemic injury),
  • Presence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or planned ID implantation before discharge, and
  • One of the following monomorphic VT events within last 6 months:

    • A: ≥3 episodes of VT treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP),
    • B: ≥1 appropriate ICD shocks,
    • C: sustained VT below detection rate of the ICD documented by ECG or any cardiac monitor
    • D: Sustained VT recorded on 12 leads ECG in the absence of ICD
  • Highly effective contraception for women of childbearing potential, maintained during research procedures
  • Signed informed consent ,
  • Affiliated to or beneficiary of a health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to understand the nature, risks, significance and implications of the clinical investigation or unwilling to provide written informed consent,
  • Active ischemia (acute thrombus diagnosed by coronary angiography, or dynamic ST segment changes demonstrated on ECG) or another reversible cause of VT (e.g. drug-induced arrhythmia), had recent acute coronary syndrome within 30 days thought to be due to acute coronary arterial thrombosis, or have CCS functional class IV angina. Note that biomarker level elevation alone after ventricular arrhythmias does not denote acute coronary syndrome or active ischemia,
  • Are known to have protruding left ventricular thrombus or mechanical aortic and mitral valves,
  • Have had a prior catheter ablation procedure for VT,
  • Presenting arrhythmia: polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF),
  • Renal failure (Creatinine clearance <30 mL/min), have NYHA Functional class IV heart failure, or a systemic illness likely to limit survival to <1 year,
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or who are planning to become pregnant during the anticipated study period,
  • Patient under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: image-guided VT ablation strategy
Catheter ablation procedure performed as part of standard care, although with the addition of an image-based 3D heart model including detailed anatomy and primary ablation targets
Catheter ablation procedure performed as part of standard care, although with the addition of an image-based 3D heart model including detailed anatomy and primary ablation targets
Active Comparator: conventional VT ablation strategy
Catheter ablation performed using conventional mapping techniques to identify targets. The ablation strategy will be left to the local investigator's decision, based on the clinical scenario and operator's habits.
Catheter ablation will be performed using conventional mapping techniques to identify targets. The ablation strategy will be left to the local investigator's decision, based on the clinical scenario and operator's habits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure duration
Time Frame: Day 1
Procedure duration measured from the first introduction of a catheter in the cardiac chamber of interest (mainly left ventricle or epicardial space) to the end of the last radiofrequency application
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of VT
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, , Month 12
Number of VT
Baseline, Month 6, , Month 12
Appropriate antitachycardia pacing from ICD >14 days after procedure
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Number of appropriate antitachycardia pacing from ICD >14 days after procedure. for ventricular arrhythmia
Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Appropriate ICD shock >14 days after procedure
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Number of any appropriate ICD shock >14 days after procedure. The ICD shocks will be automatically recorded through the device logs and transmitted via remote monitoring whenever possible. Appropriate ICD therapies are defined as antitachycardia pacing or shock delivered
Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Inappropriate ICD shock >14 days after procedure
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Number of any inappropriate ICD shock >14 days after procedure. The ICD shocks will be automatically recorded through the device logs and transmitted via remote monitoring whenever possible. - Inappropriate ICD therapies are defined as antitachycardia pacing or shock delivered for anything but ventricular arrhythmia
Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Electrical storm >14 days after procedure
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Number of electrical storm >14 days after procedure. Electrical storm is defined as 3 episodes of sustained VT/VF within 24 hours
Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Sustained VT not treated by ICD >14 days after procedure
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Number of sustained VT not treated by ICD >14 days after procedure
Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
anti-arrhythmic drugs
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Use of anti-arrhythmic drugs >30 days after procedure
Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Death
Time Frame: Month 12
Death
Month 12
General health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Quality of life using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire: The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Additinonally, the questionnaire records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'.
Baseline, Month 1, Month 6, Month 12
Radiofrequency (RF) applications
Time Frame: Day 1
Proportion of Radiofrequency (RF) applications within isthmii identified by CT-Scan vs outside isthmii
Day 1
Societal healthcare costs
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Total one-year healthcare costs from a societal perspective : Cumulative over 12 months with medical consumption, informal care, and absence from work, all measured according to the time frame indicated down below
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Payer healthcare costs
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Total one-year healthcare costs from a payer's perspective: Cumulative over 12 months with medical consumption, measured according to the time frame indicated down below
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Quality-adjusted life
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Number of (quality-adjusted life-QALY) years: Cumulative over 12 months with EQ-5D-5L measured according to the time frame indicated down below
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Incremental cost per QALY gained
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Incremental cost per QALY gained (ratio): 12-month cumulative costs divided by 12-month cumulative QALYs
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Incremental cost per VT episode avoided
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Incremental cost per VT episode avoided (ratio): 12-month cumulative costs divided by cumulative number of VT in 12-months
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Incremental cost per additional day without a VT episode
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Incremental cost per additional day without a VT episode (ratio): 12-month cumulative costs divided by cumulative number of days without VT in 12 months
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederic Sacher, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Tachycardia

Clinical Trials on image-guided VT ablation strategy

Subscribe