Prevention and Screening Towards Elimination of Cervical Cancer (PRESCRIP-TEC)

February 21, 2024 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

Prevention and Screening Intervention Project - Towards Elimination of Cervical Cancer

The research project applies the protocol of the World Health Organisation for screening of cervical cancer, with testing of hrHPV as first screening, followed by Visual Inspection of the cervix with Acetic Acid for hrHPV-positive women and for women with minor lesions thermo-ablation of affected areas. This procedure is applied in Uganda, India and Bangladesh. In Slovakia hrHPV-positive women are offered Pap-smear and for women with Pap IV lis excision.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The project performs community sensitisation and mobilisation in dedicated geographical areas and populations, to inform women and relatives about the importance of screening for cervical cancer.

To eligible women self-tests for hrHPV are offered, which can be applied at home and investigated in dedicated field-laboratories. Women who are hrHPV positive are invited for further diagnosis. In Uganda, India and Bangladesh Visual Inspection of the cervix with Acetic Acid is performed. In Slovakia Pap-smear. In case dysplasia is found, further treatment is performed with cryotherapy or thermo-ablation. Cases of suspect invasive cervical cancer are referred to hospitals for diagnosis and treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kakumiro, Uganda
        • Mpasana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female in eligible age group
  • Ability to give informed consent and participate in study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical signs of cervical carcinoma
  • Menstruation or other vaginal blood loss

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Uganda, India, Bangladesh
hrHPV self-test, followed by VIA inspection for hrHPV-positive women.
use of social media, written media, theatre and other sources of communication to reach women, and relatives, to convince them of importance of screening.
use of swabs that women insert in the vagina for taking sufficient material for testing for hrHPV. For women who are not confident to perform this this nurses provide assistance.
based on the results of the test, follow-up is offered. In case of hrHPV negative test, retesting after five years. In case of hrHPV positive test, VIA in a nearby clinic. Women have to be motivated to adhere to follow-up
Test offers insight into existence of dysplasia of the cervix by colouring the transition area
Other Names:
  • Visual Inspection of Cervix with Acetic Acid
Women with identified dysplasia lesions are offered immediate therapy to remove the infected superficial surface of the cervix
Experimental: Slovakia
hrHPV self-test, followed by Pap-smear for cytology
use of social media, written media, theatre and other sources of communication to reach women, and relatives, to convince them of importance of screening.
use of swabs that women insert in the vagina for taking sufficient material for testing for hrHPV. For women who are not confident to perform this this nurses provide assistance.
based on the results of the test, follow-up is offered. In case of hrHPV negative test, retesting after five years. In case of hrHPV positive test, VIA in a nearby clinic. Women have to be motivated to adhere to follow-up
Women with identified dysplasia lesions are offered immediate therapy to remove the infected superficial surface of the cervix
Cytology for identification of abnormal cells in the cervix, and classification of stages of dysplasia or pre-cancerous lesions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake of hrHPV self-test in community
Time Frame: One week between approaching eligible women and collecting self-test
Percentage of eligible women who take self-test out of women who have been offered self-test for hrHPV
One week between approaching eligible women and collecting self-test
Coverage of hrHPV self-test in community
Time Frame: 18 months between start approaching women in geographical area and closing screening operations in that area
Percentage of women who take self-test out of women in geographical area eligible for self-test for hrHPV.
18 months between start approaching women in geographical area and closing screening operations in that area
Uptake of VIA or Pap-smear of eligible women
Time Frame: One month between communicating hrHPV test result and measuring attendance in clinic for VIA or Pap-smear
Percentage of women who are hrHPV-positive and are invited for VIA or Pap-smear who actually undergo the procedure
One month between communicating hrHPV test result and measuring attendance in clinic for VIA or Pap-smear

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation fidelity of screening protocol
Time Frame: 24 months between start of preparations of health facilities for cervical cancer screening and measuring capabilities of health facility
Percentage of health facilities involved in the research that is capable of performing the screening protocol fully (both human resources capacity as equipment and supplies
24 months between start of preparations of health facilities for cervical cancer screening and measuring capabilities of health facility
Sustainability of screening protocol
Time Frame: 24 months between start of preparations in geographical area and measuring cervical cancer screening policies and practices in organisation
Percentage of local, district, regional health organisations involved in the study, that is able to maintain the screening protocol as Integrated part of service delivery
24 months between start of preparations in geographical area and measuring cervical cancer screening policies and practices in organisation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Business case WHO screening protocol
Time Frame: 24 months between start data collection unit costs and production business case report
Level of unit cost per screening following the new protocol and affordability in low and middle income countries
24 months between start data collection unit costs and production business case report

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carolyn Nakisige, MD, Uganda Cancer Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Jelle Stekelenburg, PhD MD, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Principal Investigator: Janine de Zeeuw, PhD, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Principal Investigator: Martin Rusnak, PhD, Trnava University
  • Principal Investigator: Aminur Rahman Shaheen, PhD, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
  • Principal Investigator: Shyamala Guruvare, PhD, Manipal Academy for Higher Education

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sharing according to the European Union Open Research guidelines

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After 1 January 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

As per Open Research Protocol, on request to Principal Investigator UMCG

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervix Cancer

Clinical Trials on Community mobilisation for hrHPV self-testing

Subscribe