INTACT Trial - an Observational Study to Assess Neuropathy in Diabetic Children (INTACT)

August 3, 2022 updated by: László Szabó MD, PhD, med habil., Heim Pal Children's Hospital

INvesTigation the Abnormality of Detrusor ConTractility by Uroflowmetry in Diabetic Children (INTACT Trial) - a Prospective, Cross-sectional, Observational, Controlled Study

It is a prospective, cross-sectional, observational, controlled, single centre clinical study. Diabetic patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and healthy controls will have uroflowmetry examination, cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction tests (heart rate response to deep breathing, to Valsalva maneuver, blood pressure and heart rate response to standing up, and to sustained handgrip), and peripheral nerve conduction test. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) of the tests. The secondary endpoints are: differences in metabolic status (weight, height, body surface, BMI, laboratory parameters, body composition), fluid turnover, and clinical symptoms of diabetic patients comparing to healthy children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The autonomic nervous system function is examined by the reproducible and standardized cardiovascular reflex tests described by Ewing et al.. During the examination, electrocardiogram and blood pressure values are recorded continuously. Heart rate response to deep inspiration is executed to investigate the parasympathetic nervous system. Peripheral neuropathy is evaluated by nerve conduction test.

The trial will start with a pilot period, when the first 50 diabetic and 50 healthy children will be assessed. This will be followed by a short evaluation period, during which the principal investigators and the study team could make adjustments in the study protocol to ensure feasibility.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

350

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Budapest, Hungary, 1089
        • Heim Pal National Pediatric Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • László Szabó

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Diabetic patients who are treated at the Endocrinology Department and Outpatient Clinic of Heim Pál National Pediatric Institute (HOGYI, Budapest, Hungary) will be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 5-18 years (boys, girls) with type 1, type 2 and monogenic DM

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute febrile condition (≥38 °C core temperature) in the past seven days
  2. Acute or chronical urinary tract or kidney disease: renal insufficiency (GFR ≤ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, urinary tract infection
  3. Urological disease: bladder cancer, urolithiasis, urethral stricture, posterior urethral valve, meatal stenosis, previous genitourinary surgery, conditions causing urinary outflow problems (phimosis, hypospadias, vesicoureteral reflux)
  4. Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD)
  5. Neurological disorders (multiple sclerosis, transient ischaemic attack, transverse myelitis, myelocele, meningomyelocele, previous spinal cord operation, or operation which might injure the sacral nerve plexus)
  6. Medicines taken which can cause neuropathy:

    1. Cytostatic agents: cyclophosphamide, platinum-based antineoplastic agents, vinca alkaloids, epothilones, taxanes, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs
    2. Immunosuppressive agents: TNF-alfa inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept), interferon
    3. Cardiovascular medicines: statins, digoxin, amiodaron
    4. Antimicrobial agents: nitrofurantoin, linezolid, voriconazole, itraconazole, antituberculotics, metronidazole, fluoroquinolone
    5. Anti-ulcerative agent: cimetidin
    6. Neuropsychological agents: levodopa, fenitoin
  7. Psychiatric disorders that prevents participation / collaboration in the study
  8. Constipation (defined according to the Rome IV criteria)
  9. Voided volume <20 mL
  10. Patients who are pregnant, or gave birth in the last 12 months
  11. Lack of consent of the patient or legal representative; the patient or legal representative withdraws his or her voluntary consent during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
diabetic children
Children aged 5-18 years (boys, girls) with type 1, type 2 and monogenic diabetes mellitus who are treated at the Endocrinology Department and Outpatient Clinic of Heim Pál National Pediatric Institute (HOGYI, Budapest, Hungary) will be enrolled. Definition of diabetes is based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria. All patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be informed of the possibility of taking part in the INTACT Trial.
Uroflowmetry will be performed using a uroflow-cystometer (UroDoc Frytech) which determines Qmax, Qave and TQmax. Voided volume (in mL), voiding time (in sec), average and maximum urinary flow rate (Qave and Qmax in mL/sec), and time to maximum urinary flow (TQmax in sec) will be measured; urine flow acceleration (Qacc in mL/sec2) will be calculated. Qmax and Qave are defined according to the International Children's Continence Society. Voided volume will be measured by the uroflow-cystometer device; boys void in a standing, girls in a sitting position. Postvoid bladder diameter (mm) will be measured by ultrasonography and converted to bladder residual volume (mL). The device will be calibrated according to the prescribed instructions for use by a skilled technician. The examinations will take approximately 10 minutes.
Other Names:
  • non-invasive urodynamic test
CAD will be assessed by five reproducible and standardized cardiovascular reflex tests described by Ewing et al. Three of the five tests assess parasympathetic function: heart rate response to deep breathing, to standing, and the Valsalva maneuver. Two tests evaluate sympathetic function which are blood pressure responses from lying to standing and at sustained handgrip. Each of these five tests is assigned a score of 0 for normal, 0.5 for borderline, and 1 for abnormal results. The sum of these 5 scores - which is the Ewing score - is used to assess severity of CAD. Patients having Ewing score ≥ 2 form the CAD + group, and patients who have less than 2 form the CAD - group.
Peripheral neuropathy will be evaluated by nerve conduction test. The device measures motor conduction in the lower extremities. It operates at two dedicated frequencies in order to perform a thick myelin sheath cordless fibre (5Hz) and thin myelinated nerve fibre (2000Hz) examination. The device will be calibrated according to the prescribed instructions for use by a skilled technician.
healthy children
Healthy children aged 5-18 years (boys, girls) without any acute or chronical disease will be will enrolled and the same tests will be performed on them as in diabetic children. Children with voided volume <20 mL, postvoid residual volume >15%, and signs of an overstretched bladder [voided volume more than: 30 x age (years) + 30 mL] will be excluded.
Uroflowmetry will be performed using a uroflow-cystometer (UroDoc Frytech) which determines Qmax, Qave and TQmax. Voided volume (in mL), voiding time (in sec), average and maximum urinary flow rate (Qave and Qmax in mL/sec), and time to maximum urinary flow (TQmax in sec) will be measured; urine flow acceleration (Qacc in mL/sec2) will be calculated. Qmax and Qave are defined according to the International Children's Continence Society. Voided volume will be measured by the uroflow-cystometer device; boys void in a standing, girls in a sitting position. Postvoid bladder diameter (mm) will be measured by ultrasonography and converted to bladder residual volume (mL). The device will be calibrated according to the prescribed instructions for use by a skilled technician. The examinations will take approximately 10 minutes.
Other Names:
  • non-invasive urodynamic test
CAD will be assessed by five reproducible and standardized cardiovascular reflex tests described by Ewing et al. Three of the five tests assess parasympathetic function: heart rate response to deep breathing, to standing, and the Valsalva maneuver. Two tests evaluate sympathetic function which are blood pressure responses from lying to standing and at sustained handgrip. Each of these five tests is assigned a score of 0 for normal, 0.5 for borderline, and 1 for abnormal results. The sum of these 5 scores - which is the Ewing score - is used to assess severity of CAD. Patients having Ewing score ≥ 2 form the CAD + group, and patients who have less than 2 form the CAD - group.
Peripheral neuropathy will be evaluated by nerve conduction test. The device measures motor conduction in the lower extremities. It operates at two dedicated frequencies in order to perform a thick myelin sheath cordless fibre (5Hz) and thin myelinated nerve fibre (2000Hz) examination. The device will be calibrated according to the prescribed instructions for use by a skilled technician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
diagnostic accuracy of uroflowmetry test 1.1
Time Frame: baseline
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
baseline
diagnostic accuracy of uroflowmetry test 1.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 12 months
diagnostic accuracy of uroflowmetry test 1.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 24 months
diagnostic accuracy of uroflowmetry test 1.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 36 months
diagnostic accuracy of uroflowmetry test 1.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 48 months
diagnostic accuracy of uroflowmetry test 1.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 60 months
diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction test 2.1
Time Frame: baseline
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
baseline
diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction test 2.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 12 months
diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction test 2.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 24 months
diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction test 2.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 36 months
diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction test 2.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 48 months
diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction test 2.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 60 months
diagnostic accuracy of peripheral nerve conduction test 3.1
Time Frame: baseline
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
baseline
diagnostic accuracy of peripheral nerve conduction test 3.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 12 months
diagnostic accuracy of peripheral nerve conduction test 3.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 24 months
diagnostic accuracy of peripheral nerve conduction test 3.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 36 months
diagnostic accuracy of peripheral nerve conduction test 3.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 48 months
diagnostic accuracy of peripheral nerve conduction test 3.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
change from baseline at 60 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
metabolic status 1.1
Time Frame: baseline
weight (kg)
baseline
metabolic status 1.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
weight (kg)
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 1.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
weight (kg)
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 1.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
weight (kg)
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 1.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
weight (kg)
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 1.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
weight (kg)
change from baseline at 60 months
metabolic status 2.1
Time Frame: baseline
height (cm)
baseline
metabolic status 2.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
height (cm)
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 2.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
height (cm)
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 2.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
height (cm)
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 2.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
height (cm)
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 2.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
height (cm)
change from baseline at 60 months
metabolic status 3.1
Time Frame: baseline
body surface (m2 calculated by the Mosteller formula)
baseline
metabolic status 3.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
body surface (m2 calculated by the Mosteller formula)
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 3.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
body surface (m2 calculated by the Mosteller formula)
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 3.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
body surface (m2 calculated by the Mosteller formula)
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 3.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
body surface (m2 calculated by the Mosteller formula)
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 3.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
body surface (m2 calculated by the Mosteller formula)
change from baseline at 60 months
metabolic status 4.1
Time Frame: baseline
BMI (kg/m2)
baseline
metabolic status 4.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
BMI (kg/m2)
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 4.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
BMI (kg/m2)
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 4.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
BMI (kg/m2)
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 4.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
BMI (kg/m2)
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 4.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
BMI (kg/m2)
change from baseline at 60 months
metabolic status 5.1
Time Frame: baseline
body composition evaluated by the Inbody device
baseline
metabolic status 5.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
body composition evaluated by the Inbody device
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 5.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
body composition evaluated by the Inbody device
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 5.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
body composition evaluated by the Inbody device
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 5.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
body composition evaluated by the Inbody device
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 5.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
body composition evaluated by the Inbody device
change from baseline at 60 months
metabolic status 6.1
Time Frame: baseline
laboratory parameters (CRP, ESR, full blood count, Hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocyte, glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, carbamide, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, ALP, Na, K, P, Ca, albumin, serum total protein, lipase, amylase, urine rapid test)
baseline
metabolic status 6.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
laboratory parameters (CRP, ESR, full blood count, Hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocyte, glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, carbamide, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, ALP, Na, K, P, Ca, albumin, serum total protein, lipase, amylase, urine rapid test)
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 6.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
laboratory parameters (CRP, ESR, full blood count, Hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocyte, glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, carbamide, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, ALP, Na, K, P, Ca, albumin, serum total protein, lipase, amylase, urine rapid test)
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 6.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
laboratory parameters (CRP, ESR, full blood count, Hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocyte, glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, carbamide, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, ALP, Na, K, P, Ca, albumin, serum total protein, lipase, amylase, urine rapid test)
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 6.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
laboratory parameters (CRP, ESR, full blood count, Hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocyte, glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, carbamide, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, ALP, Na, K, P, Ca, albumin, serum total protein, lipase, amylase, urine rapid test)
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 6.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
laboratory parameters (CRP, ESR, full blood count, Hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocyte, glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, carbamide, AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, ALP, Na, K, P, Ca, albumin, serum total protein, lipase, amylase, urine rapid test)
change from baseline at 60 months
metabolic status 7.1
Time Frame: baseline
fluid turnover in 24 hours (mL)
baseline
metabolic status 7.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
fluid turnover in 24 hours (mL)
change from baseline at 12 months
metabolic status 7.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
fluid turnover in 24 hours (mL)
change from baseline at 24 months
metabolic status 7.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
fluid turnover in 24 hours (mL)
change from baseline at 36 months
metabolic status 7.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
fluid turnover in 24 hours (mL)
change from baseline at 48 months
metabolic status 7.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
fluid turnover in 24 hours (mL)
change from baseline at 60 months
clinical symptoms of diabetic patients will be measured and compared to healthy children. 8.1
Time Frame: baseline
clinical symptoms (Urgent urination, Daily urine incontinence, Urination during night time, Nocturia, Frequency of bowel movement, Consistency of the stool)
baseline
clinical symptoms of diabetic patients will be measured and compared to healthy children. 8.2
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
clinical symptoms (Urgent urination, Daily urine incontinence, Urination during night time, Nocturia, Frequency of bowel movement, Consistency of the stool)
change from baseline at 12 months
clinical symptoms of diabetic patients will be measured and compared to healthy children. 8.3
Time Frame: change from baseline at 24 months
clinical symptoms (Urgent urination, Daily urine incontinence, Urination during night time, Nocturia, Frequency of bowel movement, Consistency of the stool)
change from baseline at 24 months
clinical symptoms of diabetic patients will be measured and compared to healthy children. 8.4
Time Frame: change from baseline at 36 months
clinical symptoms (Urgent urination, Daily urine incontinence, Urination during night time, Nocturia, Frequency of bowel movement, Consistency of the stool)
change from baseline at 36 months
clinical symptoms of diabetic patients will be measured and compared to healthy children. 8.5
Time Frame: change from baseline at 48 months
clinical symptoms (Urgent urination, Daily urine incontinence, Urination during night time, Nocturia, Frequency of bowel movement, Consistency of the stool)
change from baseline at 48 months
clinical symptoms of diabetic patients will be measured and compared to healthy children. 8.6
Time Frame: change from baseline at 60 months
clinical symptoms (Urgent urination, Daily urine incontinence, Urination during night time, Nocturia, Frequency of bowel movement, Consistency of the stool)
change from baseline at 60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KUT-37/2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on uroflowmetry

Subscribe