Tolerance of Anti-Cancer Therapy in the Elderly (TOASTIE)

February 22, 2022 updated by: The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
This is a multicentre observational study evaluating frailty and tolerance of chemotherapy in the elderly.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a multicentre observational study evaluating frailty and tolerance of chemotherapy in the elderly.

The number of people with cancer over the age of 65 years is increasing and more older patients are being treated with chemotherapy. Previous research has shown that patients living with frailty are more likely to experience significant toxicity from chemotherapy.

A scoring system exists, the CARG (Cancer Aging Research Group) score), which using sociodemographics, tumour/treatment variables, laboratory test results (haemoglobin and creatinine clearance), geriatric assessment variables (function, co-morbidity, cognition, psychological state, social activity/support and nutritional status) predicts the likelihood of patients in this population developing a grade 3-5 toxicity. The CARG score ranges from 0 (lowest toxicity risk) to 19 (highest toxicity risk).

This scoring system was developed and validated in the USA (United States of America). It was not however found to be predictive of toxicity in Australia. To date it has not been evaluated, nor is used in routine practice in oncology in the UK (United Kingdom).

This study is looking at markers of frailty in patients >65years. The investigators seek to predict those who are at a higher risk of side effects from chemotherapy. The investigators are looking to validate the CARG score in a UK NHS (National Health Service) population and show feasibility of using this in routine practice. The investigators are also evaluating if other scoring systems which are routinely used to assess frailty (but have never been assessed for predicting toxicity) are useful in predicting toxicity.

Secondary objectives include describing frailty in this population, exploring patients' perceptions of risk associated with chemotherapy and demonstrating the added value of risk prediction tools compared to clinicians estimates of toxicity risk.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults aged 65years or over, about to receive first line chemotherapy for a solid tumour based malignancy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >65years
  • About to start first line chemotherapy for a solid tumour based malignancy
  • Chemotherapy given for any intent eg. adjuvant or palliative
  • Estimated survival of >3months
  • Able to comprehend and complete questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical or psychiatric condition impairing ability to consent
  • Participant is enrolled in another clinical trial
  • Prior chemotherapy for any indication
  • Receiving concurrent radiotherapy (RT) or immunotherapy (IT)
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To validate the CARG scoring system
Time Frame: 6 months follow up

To validate the CARG scoring system (a score which is calculated by the doctor using patient information) in a UK real-world population and show feasibility of implementing CARG scoring in routine NHS practice.

The investigators will collect the information required and calculate a CARG score for each participant.

The investigators will record Grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicities (as assessed using CTCAEv5) for each participant.

The investigators will evaluate if the CARG score is predictive of Grade 3-5 toxicity (as assessed using CTCAEv5) in this UK real-world population.

The investigators will record how long it takes to collect this information and calculate the score to see if it is feasible to implement this in a real world setting.

6 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy - demographics
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
The investigators are reporting demographics: age (years) and gender
6 months follow up
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy - tumour type
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
The investigators are reporting tumour type eg. breast cancer, gastric cancer etc.
6 months follow up
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy - chemotherapy type
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
The investigators will be reporting chemotherapy drugs delivered
6 months follow up
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy - laboratory test results (Hb)
Time Frame: 6 months follow up

The investigators will be reporting laboratory test results prior to first cycle of chemotherapy

-haemoglobin (g/L)

6 months follow up
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy - laboratory test results (CrCl)
Time Frame: 6 months follow up

The investigators will be reporting laboratory test results prior to first cycle of chemotherapy

-creatinine clearance (mL/min)

6 months follow up
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy using SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) Geriatric Screening Tool (G8)
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
Investigators will calculate the SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) Geriatric Screening Tool (G8) and report the score
6 months follow up
Describe frailty in elderly patients (>65years) in the UK NHS prior to starting chemotherapy using the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS)
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
Investigators will record the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) and report the scores
6 months follow up
Evaluate the predictive value of commonly used geriatric assessment tools in predicting chemotherapy tolerance
Time Frame: 6 months follow up

Frailty scoring systems (G8 and CFS) will be calculated. Grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicities will (as assessed using CTCAEv5) will be recorded.

The investigators will assess if these scoring systems have utility in predicting risk of grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicity.

6 months follow up
The CARG score which reports the risk of grade 3-5 toxicity as assessed using CTCAEv5 as a percentage.
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
6 months follow up
Explore patients perception of risk associated with chemotherapy in this population
Time Frame: 6 months follow up

Participants will report their perception of likelihood of developing a side effect from chemotherapy which would cause the participant to stay in hospital for one night or longer or have to stop treatment using the following options: Unlikely, Not very likely, Quite likely or Very likely, as well as using a percentage scale as seen below.

0 means I think it definitely won't happen to me → 100 means I think I will definitely need to stop treatment or stay hospital at some point during my treatment

0-----10-----20-----30-----40-----50-----60-----70-----80-----90----100

6 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen C Dearden, helen.dearden1@nhs.net

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MO19/127559

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Subscribe