Effects of Tablet Computer-based Cognitive Training in Patients With Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

April 19, 2023 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital
To evaluate the effectiveness of tablet computer-based cognitive training in patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterized by abnormal movement to reproduce dreams and loss of skeletal muscle tension during REM sleep. Idiopathic RBD (iRBD) refers to the absence of any predisposing factors or comorbid neurological disorders. iRBD is considered the prodromal stage of alpha-synucleinopathy.

Through past studies, it has been confirmed that cognitive function decline has already occurred in a significant number of iRBD patients. However, there is still no treatment that can suppress or delay the onset of neurodegenerative diseases.

The cognitive function improvement effect of computerized cognitive training in the elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment is known. However, the effect of cognitive training on improving cognitive function in iRBD patients has not been studied.

The investigators developed a program that allows patients to train cognitive functions in various domains by repeatedly performing tasks related to daily life activities. In addition, by loading the program on the tablet computer, it is possible to participate in the training easily at home using the touch screen without visiting the hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 60-80 years old who have been diagnosed with iRBD through nocturnal polysomnography according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders 3rd Edition (ICSD-3) diagnostic criteria
  • Those who gave their written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and multiple system atrophy
  • Patients with secondary causes of RBD
  • Patients with severe hearing, visual impairment, or motor impairment
  • Patients who have received cognitive training within the last year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tablet group
A total of 36 sessions per week for 12 weeks of cognitive training program using a tablet computer are performed.

The subject of the study executes a program mounted on a tablet personal computer (PC) (Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite) and performs a cognitive training task by touching the screen with the index finger.

It consists of 10 tasks related to the activity of daily living: 1) taking medicine, 2) making a phone call, 3) taking a shower, 4) doing laundry, 5) finding directions, 6) riding the bus, 7) buying goods, 8) Money management, 9) ingredient sorting, 10) meal preparation.

It is involved in cognitive functions in various domains such as attention, working memory, processing speed, problem solving, visuospatial ability, verbal and visuospatial memory.

There are three levels of difficulty for each task, high, medium, and low, and the difficulty becomes more difficult as session 1 to 36 progresses.

One cognitive training session lasts about 30 minutes.

No Intervention: control group
Subjects assigned to the control group did not receive any separate cognitive training for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K) total score
Time Frame: Change from baseline CERAD-K total score at 12 weeks
Z score of total 5 domains (attentive, memory, language, visuospatial and executive functions)
Change from baseline CERAD-K total score at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in CERAD-K attention score
Time Frame: Change from baseline CERAD-K attention score at 12 weeks

Scores for each of the 5 domains

1.Attention

  • Trail making test A (0~360): higher scores mean a worse outcome
  • Stroop test (word) (0~): higher scores mean a better outcome
Change from baseline CERAD-K attention score at 12 weeks
Change in CERAD-K memory score
Time Frame: Change from baseline CERAD-K memory score at 12 weeks

Scores for each of the 5 domains 2.Memory

  • Word registration (0~30): higher scores mean a better outcome
  • Word recall (0~10): higher scores mean a better outcome
  • Word recognition (0~10): higher scores mean a better outcome
  • Constructional recall (0~11): higher scores mean a better outcome
Change from baseline CERAD-K memory score at 12 weeks
Change in CERAD-K language score
Time Frame: Change from baseline CERAD-K language score at 12 weeks

Scores for each of the 5 domains 3.Language

- Boston naming test (0~15): higher scores mean a better outcome

Change from baseline CERAD-K language score at 12 weeks
Change in CERAD-K visuospatial function score
Time Frame: Change from baseline CERAD-K visualspatial function score at 12 weeks

Scores for each of the 5 domains 4.Visuospatial function

- Constructional behavior (0~11): higher scores mean a better outcome

Change from baseline CERAD-K visualspatial function score at 12 weeks
Change in CERAD-K executive function score
Time Frame: Change from baseline CERAD-K executive function score at 12 weeks

Scores for each of the 5 domains 5.Executive function

  • Trail making test B (0~300): higher scores mean a worse outcome
  • Language fluency (0~): higher scores mean a better outcome
  • Stroop test (word/color) (0~): higher scores mean a better outcome
Change from baseline CERAD-K executive function score at 12 weeks
Change in mini-mental status examination in the Korean version (MMSE-K) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline MMSE-K score at 12 weeks
minimum value: 0, maximum value: 30 (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Change from baseline MMSE-K score at 12 weeks
Change in Korean version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-K) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline MoCA-K score at 12 weeks
minimum value: 0, maximum value: 30 (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Change from baseline MoCA-K score at 12 weeks
Change in resting electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum
Time Frame: Change from baseline EEG power spectrum at 12 weeks
distribution of power into frequency components composing the signal (delta, theta, alpha, beta)
Change from baseline EEG power spectrum at 12 weeks
Change in resting electroencephalography (EEG) weighted phase lag index
Time Frame: Change from baseline EEG weighted phase lag index at 12 weeks
a functional connectivity measure that quantified how consistently 90° (or 270°) phase 'lagging' one EEG signal was compared to another (From 0 to 1, if it is close to 1, the connectivity is high)
Change from baseline EEG weighted phase lag index at 12 weeks
Change in event-related potential (ERP) reaction time
Time Frame: Change from baseline ERP reaction time at 12 weeks
time (ms) from target presentation to button press
Change from baseline ERP reaction time at 12 weeks
Change in event-related potential (ERP) hit rate
Time Frame: Change from baseline ERP hit rate at 12 weeks
the probability that an old item is either correctly recognized, or not
Change from baseline ERP hit rate at 12 weeks
Change in event-related potential (ERP) N2 amplitude
Time Frame: Change from baseline ERP N2 amplitude at 12 weeks
The N2 peak (μV) is a fronto-central maximal negativity observed approximately 150-400 ms after stimulus onset
Change from baseline ERP N2 amplitude at 12 weeks
Change in event-related potential (ERP) time-frequency analysis
Time Frame: Change from baseline ERP time-frequency analysis at 12 weeks
Indicates the power of the EEG frequency at a specific time
Change from baseline ERP time-frequency analysis at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ki-Young Jung, professor, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

Clinical Trials on Tablet computer-based cognitive training program

Subscribe