Collaborative Approach to Examining Adversity and Building Resilience Study (CARE)

To examine the behavioral, psychosocial, and biologic impact of resilience-promoting interventions associated with primary care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Early-life trauma and related adversities are prevalent and associated with negative health and achievement outcomes. These adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are especially common in economically disadvantaged and communities of color. While there has been tremendous growth in knowledge about ACEs and their impact on health across the life course, critical gaps persist: 1) Which biologic pathways are most affected by ACEs during early childhood and may help identify those children at greatest risk for future poor health? And, 2) How may child and family resilience be bolstered across the care continuum to mitigate the negative health effects of ACEs? These critical gaps severely limit our ability to effectively identify children at high-risk and to intervene to promote resilience before poor health occurs.

Three previously piloted resilience-promoting, caregiver-child interventions will be examined: primary care-based, group-delivered Resilience Clinic (RC); home-based, dyadic Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC); and primary care-based, dyadic Resiliency Family Program (RFP). Using a randomized wait- list controlled trial design,12 families will be assigned to intervention or enhanced primary care (n=50/arm in each intervention, total n=300). Pre-post intervention health (behavioral, caregiver stress) and biology will be compared between intervention and controls, as well as modifying factors such as setting and delivery method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94609
        • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
      • Richmond, California, United States, 94804
        • Lifelong Medical Care
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93101
        • Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Regular access to web-based computer, smart phone, or tablet if necessary to delivery via telehealth due to the COVID19 Pandemic (relative exclusion criteria - have budgeted to provide tablets and mobile wifi hot spots for up to 10% of participants)
  2. Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) Program

    • Caregiver: 18 years old and older, primary caregiver, English or Spanish speaking
    • Child: 2 to 4 years, PEARLS score > 1
  3. Resilience Clinic

    • Caregiver: 18 years old and older, primary caregiver, English or Spanish speaking
    • Child: 2 to 5 years, PEARLS score > 1 or verbal disclosure of PEARLS adversity to primary care clinician/staff
  4. HEROES Family Program

    • Caregiver: 18 years old and older, primary caregiver, ACE score > 2 if child PEARLS score = 0, English or Spanish speaking
    • Child: 2 to 5 years, PEARLS score > 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Caregiver: active suicidality, other psychiatric issues
  2. Child: significant medical co-morbidities (i.e. disease requiring immunomodulators, chemo or radiation therapy, or hormonal therapy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Caregiver-Child Intervention
Investigators will examine the immediate psychosocial, behavioral, and child biologic response to three caregiver-child interventions depending on site of enrollment. Each interventions contain overlapping core elements, but also contribute unique facets, allowing us to examine overall intervention effects, as well as unique settings (e.g. home vs. clinic) and delivery effects (1:1 vs. group), providing insight for future direction.

Intervention Groups:

  1. Resilience Clinic (Benioff Oakland): 6 weekly interactive group-based visits in primary care that draws from the evidence-based Circle of Security Parenting along with the principles of mindfulness;
  2. ABC Intervention (Lifelong): 10 weekly home visiting sessions. ABC is an empirically supported parenting program that focuses on improving maternal sensitivity;

    and,

  3. Resiliency Family Program (Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinic): 4 primary-care-based visits, every 2-3 weeks, that include psycho-education materials drawing from the culturally-responsive, evidence-based program, Madres a Madres.
Active Comparator: Enhanced Primary Care
Navigational services for social need resources.
Enhanced Primary Care (control group): This includes care coordination services for community resources in addition to usual care. Participants will be asked about any unmet social needs, e.g. food insecurity, financial strain, safe places to play. Those who endorse need will be offered navigational services to link to community resources.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Parenting Stress Index (PSI) score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Caregiver reported survey validated measure of parenting stress. The Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI) is a 36-item self-report measure completed by parents to measure stress level within the context of parenting. Participants respond to items on a 5-point Likert scale. Responses to each item in a sub-category are totaled to calculate three subcategory scores, which are summed to represent a total parenting stress score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of parenting stress.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) total problems scale score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Caregiver reported survey validated measure of child behavioral and emotional challenges on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Preschool form from The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). The CBCL is standardized for children ages 1.5 to 5 years. Respondents are asked to rate 99 problem items as 0 for "not true of the child," 1 for "somewhat or sometimes true of the child," and 2 for "very true or often true of the child" based on the past two months. The range of possible values is 0-100.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in global health (PROMIS global health)
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. This study uses the first question on the global scale, with minimum value of 1 and maximum of 5. Higher scores mean better general health.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in caregiver depression (PHQ) total score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Caregiver reported survey validated measure of self-report depressive symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Respondents are asked 8 questions to rate from 0 for "not at all" to 3 for "nearly every day" based on the past two weeks. The range of possible values is from 0-27. Higher scores indicate higher self-report depressive symptoms.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in caregiver anxiety (GAD) total score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Caregiver reported survey validated measure of self-report symptoms of general anxiety on the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) questionnaire. Respondents are asked 7 questions to rate from 0 for "not at all" to 3 for "nearly every day" based on the past two weeks. The range of possible values is from 0-21. Higher score indicates higher self-report general anxiety symptoms.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in family cohesion total score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II (FACES II) family cohesion scale evaluates eight concepts (2 items each): emotional bonding, family boundaries, coalitions, time, space, friends, decision-making, and interest and recreation. Respondents rate from 1 for "almost never or never" to 5 for "almost always or always." A higher score indicates high family cohesion.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in adult reported social and emotional support (ARSES) total score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Adult-reported social and emotional support is assessed using a standardized single item, "How often do you get the social and emotional support you need?" Response choices were "always," "usually," "sometimes," "rarely," or "never."
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in atopy (ISSAC screen)
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
ISAAC was an epidemiological study following a survey of 2 million children worldwide to evaluate the prevalence of atopic disease in various ethnic backgrounds. The questionnaire is self-reported by parents and children to evaluate asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in childhood. 21 items, core questionnaires to assess the prevalence and severity of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in defined populations.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in general stress (Perceived Stress Scale) total score
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
The Perceived Stress Scale measures the extent to which an individual perceives situations in his or her life as stressful. It is a measure of global perceived stress and asks about feelings and thoughts during the last month. Respondents are asked 10 questions to rate from 0 for "never" to 4 for "very often" based on the past month. The range of possible values is from 0-40. Higher score indicates higher perceived stress.
baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Change in health-related social needs (Accountable Health Communities total score)
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends

Questionnaire assessing impacts of current unmet health-related social needs (6 items; housing instability and problems, food insecurity, transportation needs, problems paying for utilities/bills) and number of current social needs.

Questionnaire assessing impacts of current unmet health-related social needs (6 items; housing instability and problems, food insecurity, transportation needs, problems paying for utilities/bills) and number of current social needs.

Questionnaire assessing impacts of current unmet health-related social needs (6 items; housing instability and problems, food insecurity, transportation needs, problems paying for utilities/bills) and number of current social needs.

baseline/enrollment and 2 week and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Telomere length
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Telomeres are nucleoproteins that protect the ends of chromosomes. Telomere length is a biomarker of cellular aging. Chronic stress has been associated with shorter telomere length.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Leptin
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Leptin is a hormone primarily secreted by fat cells to reduce hunger.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
CRP
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
C-reactive protein is produced by the liver in response to inflammation. Higher level of CRP in the blood is an indicator of inflammation.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
IGFBP1
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 is mainly expressed in the liver and circulates in plasma where it interacts with IGF-1 and 2. IGFBP-1 plays an important role in metabolism and low levels of this protein has associated with impaired glucose tolerance and hypertension
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
HA1C
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
The hemoglobin A1c (glycated hemoglobin, glycosylated hemoglobin, HbA1c, or A1c) test is used to evaluate a person's level of glucose control. The test shows an average of the blood sugar level over the past 90 days and represents a percentage.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, averaged across 3 readings.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
resting heart rate
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Number of beats per minutes.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
waist circumference
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Measuring waist circumference in cm. Waist and hip measurements will be combined to report waist-hip ratio (WHR) as a dimensionless ratio of the circumference of the waist to that of the hips.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
hip circumference
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Measuring hip circumference in cm. Waist and hip measurements will be combined to report waist-hip ratio (WHR) as a dimensionless ratio of the circumference of the waist to that of the hips.
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
weight
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Weight will be measured in kg. Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
height
Time Frame: baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends
Height will be measured in cm. Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
baseline/enrollment and 3-month follow-up after intervention ends

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21-34534

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Early Life Adversity

Clinical Trials on Caregiver-child Intervention

Subscribe