Resilience-based Psychosocial Intervention Among Children Affected by HIV/AIDS

November 28, 2020 updated by: Xiaoming Li, University of South Carolina

Resilience-based Psychosocial Intervention Among Children Affected by HIV/AIDS in China

Parental illness and death from HIV/AIDS has a profound and lasting impact on a child's psychosocial well-being, potentially challenging the basic needs for survival and compromising the child's future. Therefore, the impact of parental HIV/AIDS on children needs to be treated from both a public health and a developmental perspective. However, to date the role of a resilience-based approach among children affected by HIV is hypothesized but not evidence-based. In this application, we propose to develop a theory-guided, resilience-based, multimodal intervention by culturally adapting and integrating components from three SAMHSA model programs which show strong evidence in promoting protective factors among young children. The multimodal intervention will include three approach levels: the individual child (peer-group activities), the family (caregiver parenting skill training), and the local community (community advocacy). The short, medium, and long-term efficacy of the Child-Caregiver-Advocacy-Resilience [ChildCARE] intervention to improve health and psychosocial well-being of children will be evaluated over 36 months through a cluster randomized controlled trial. About 800 HIV/AIDS-affected children (8 to 11 years of age) and their primary caregivers will be recruited from central China where we have built a strong research infrastructure and community collaboration during our previous study. The primary outcome measures for the children will include physical health, mental health, growth and development, school performance, and a biological indicator of neurobiological stress response (salivary cortisol). The outcome measures at caregiver level will include parenting style, parental engagement, and mental health well-being. The changes at the community level will be measured using children's and caregivers' perceptions of social support and HIV-related public stigma. We will also examine the potential mechanism through which the ChildCARE intervention is exerting its impact by identifying improvement in protective factors and other individual and contextual factors that potentially mediate or moderate the intervention effect. This proposed project will examine whether the multilevel protective factors we identified in our initial project are amenable to intervention and whether their hypothesized changes explain improvement in children outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

During the past five years (09/05-08/10) we were funded by R01MH76488 to study the psychosocial needs of children affected by HIV including both orphans (children under 18 who lost one or both of their parents to HIV/AIDS) and vulnerable children (children with one or both parents infected with HIV) in rural China. The overarching goal of our previous study was to inform the development of effective, culturally appropriate, and sustainable psychosocial interventions for these children. Guided by a developmental psychopathology perspective, we constructed an assessment model that integrated research findings from the literatures on bereavement, attachment, risk and resilience to delineate the children's psychosocial needs following HIV-related parental death or illness1. We incorporated both individual and environmental factors that potentially could moderate or mediate the negative effects of parental HIV/AIDS on these children. The comprehensive qualitative and quantitative data we collected and reported in 29 peer-reviewed publications during the past five years have provided the critical foundation for a cultural adaptation of theory-driven psychosocial prevention programs among children affected by HIV. The main findings from this body of research included 1) children affected by HIV experienced greater mental and developmental challenges (e.g., trauma symptoms, depression, social isolation, poor school performance) than comparison children who were from the same community but did not experience HIV-related illness and death in their families; 2) some children demonstrated tremendous resilience reflected in good school performances and the absence of elevated levels of psychosocial problems despite parental HIV/AIDS and other traumatic events in their lives; and, 3) key protective factors exist within the child and the social environment (e.g., positive future orientation, trusted caregivers, and supportive community) which could contribute to resilience in these children, and hence buffer the children from the detrimental effects of parental HIV/AIDS. The proposed project will examine whether the protective factors identified in our previous study are amenable to intervention and whether their hypothesized changes can indeed explain improvement in mental and developmental outcomes among participating children.

From research on early childhood development, compelling evidence has revealed the critical importance of successful adaptation in the face of adversity ("resilience") for laying the foundation for successful adjustment later in life2-4. However, to date the utility of a resilience-based intervention approach among children affected by HIV is hypothesized but not evidence-based5-6.Therefore, in this application, we propose to adapt three evidence-based programs to produce a theory-driven resilience-based intervention to improve the well-being of children affected by HIV in rural China. The proposed multimodal "Child Caregiver-Advocacy-Resilience" intervention (ChildCARE) will include three integrated components: the individual child (peer-group activities), family (caregiver parenting skill training), and the local community (community advocacy). The short, medium, and long-term efficacy of the ChildCARe intervention will be evaluated over 36 months through a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary outcome measures for the children will include physical health, mental health, growth and development, school performance, and a biological indicator of neurobiological stress response (i.e., salivary cortisol). There are three specific aims and four hypotheses in our application:

AIM #1: Develop a theory-guided, resilience-based, multimodal intervention [ChildCARe] by culturally adapting and integrating components from three SAMHSA model programs which show strong evidence in promoting protective factors among children; the adaptation process will be informed by 1) the data collected from our previous study; 2) our 18 years' experience in developing and adapting effective HIV behavioral prevention programs in various cultural settings including China; and 3) input from the local collaborators and communities (e.g., community advisory board and research participants); AIM #2: Test the efficacy of the ChildCARe intervention through a cluster RCT involving 800 HIV-affected children (8 to 11 years of age) and their primary caregivers from 80 villages in central China where we have built a strong research infrastructure and community collaboration during our previous study; AIM #3: Examine the potential mechanism of the intervention by identifying improvement in protective factors and other individual and contextual factors that potentially mediate or moderate the intervention effect;

Hypothesis #1: The ChildCARe intervention will demonstrate short, medium, and long-term efficacy in improving children's primary outcomes and biological indicator (salivary cortisol); Hypothesis #2: The ChildCARE intervention will demonstrate short, medium, and long-term efficacy in improving children's intermediate outcomes (e.g., social-emotional competence, positive future orientation, and trusting relationship with current caregivers), caregiver's outcomes (e.g., parenting skills, mental health well-being), and community-level outcomes (e.g., children's and caregivers' perceptions of social support); Hypothesis #3: Improvement in intermediate outcomes at levels of child, family, and community will mediate the effect of the ChildCARE intervention on the children's primary outcomes and biological indicator; Hypothesis #4: Some contextual factors (e.g., care arrangement, household socioeconomic status [SES], caregiver's physical health status, disease progression for caregivers living with HIV) will moderate the effect of ChildCARE intervention on the children's primary outcomes and biological indicator.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

790

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29208
        • University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 8 to 17 years of age
  • having lost one or both parent to AIDS (orphans) or are currently living with a HIV-positive parent (vulnerable children)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children living in centralized care setting;
  • known HIV-infection;
  • physical illness and developmental disability (e.g., severe mental retardation) that prevent them from engaging routine daily activities;
  • plan to permanently relocate outside of the province within a year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Child-only Intervention
The children in this arm will receive only child intervention curriculum (peer group activities). The child intervention includes 20 hours of facilitator-guided programming delivered in 10 sessions in a peer-group setting and aims to increase resilience by developing a number of skills including positive thinking, emotional regulation, coping, and problem solving.
The proposed multimodal "Child Caregiver-Advocacy-Resilience" intervention (ChildCARE) will include three integrated components: the individual child (peer-group activities), family (caregiver parenting skill training), and the local community (community advocacy).
Experimental: Child+Caregiver Intervention
The children in this arm will receive child intervention and their caregivers will receive the caregiver intervention, At the caregiver level, caregivers receive 10 hours of facilitator-guided programming delivered in five sessions that aims to increase positive parenting skills and build the capacity of the caregiver to engage in self-care and seek support.
The proposed multimodal "Child Caregiver-Advocacy-Resilience" intervention (ChildCARE) will include three integrated components: the individual child (peer-group activities), family (caregiver parenting skill training), and the local community (community advocacy).
Experimental: Child+Caregiver+Community Intervention
The children in this arm will received child intervention; their family will receive caregiver intervention and community-based intervention. At the community level, trained community advocates (e.g., teachers, village nurses) conduct monthly home visits and organize a series of community-based activities over a period of two years to promote cohesion and strength within local communities and to increase community support for affected families.
The proposed multimodal "Child Caregiver-Advocacy-Resilience" intervention (ChildCARE) will include three integrated components: the individual child (peer-group activities), family (caregiver parenting skill training), and the local community (community advocacy).
No Intervention: Attention Control
Children and caregivers who do not receive any intervention activities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of psychological resilience at 36 months follow up
Time Frame: 7 waves during 36 months with a 6-month interval
Resilience-related outcomes at child level
7 waves during 36 months with a 6-month interval
change of school performance at 36 months follow up
Time Frame: 7 waves during 36 months with a 6-month interval
Children's academic performance and other schooling outcomes
7 waves during 36 months with a 6-month interval
change of mental health status at 36 months follow up
Time Frame: 7 waves during 36 months with a 6-month interval
Children's mental health outcomes
7 waves during 36 months with a 6-month interval

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of parenting practices at 36 months follow up
Time Frame: 4 waves (from caregivers) over 36 months
perceptions and practices of parenting reported by both children and caregivers
4 waves (from caregivers) over 36 months
Changes of parental depression at 36 months follow up
Time Frame: 4 waves over 36 months
Caregiver mental health outcomes
4 waves over 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotional Adjustment

Clinical Trials on Child-Caregiver-Advocacy-Resilience [ChildCARE] intervention

3
Subscribe