Remote Mindfulness Training Following Early Life Adversity (ReMind)

Smartphone-based Mindfulness Training for Health Following Early Life Adversity

This study will test the feasibility of delivering smartphone-based mindfulness and coping interventions to a sample of emerging/young adults with a history of early life adversity (ELA). 80 participants with a history of ELA will be randomly assigned to complete a two-week mindfulness training intervention or matched coping control intervention, both involving 14 foundational audio-guided lessons and practice prompts randomly delivered 3x daily. At baseline, post-intervention, and one-month follow-up lab assessments, participants will complete questionnaires and provide blood samples for assessment of markers of inflammation. Data assessing subjective and physiological stress in daily life will be collected during the intervention and for one week before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention. Passive sensor data will be continuously collected from participants' smartphones and wearable devices to develop exploratory models that estimate and predict daily life stress. Data will be used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of interventions and assessments in an ELA sample, test effects of mindfulness training on daily life stress and markers of inflammation in an ELA sample, and develop exploratory machine learning models of stress from passive sensor data.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Stress; Mindfulness; Early Life Adversity
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Mindfulness; Behavioral: Coping

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 81
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
      • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 29 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Ages 18-29 years
• English speaking
• History of moderate-to-severe physical, emotional, or sexual abuse in childhood
• Data-enabled Android or iOS smartphone
• Able to meet study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

• Self-reported diagnosis of chronic physical disease (e.g., cancer, HIV, heart disease, diabetes, bleeding disorder)
• Self-reported diagnosis of chronic mental disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, personality disorder, or psychotic illness), major neurological disorder, or suicidal thoughts or wishes at baseline
• Substance use disorder
• Medication use that interferes with HPA-axis activity (e.g., corticosteroids), autonomic activity (e.g., antihypertensive medication), inflammatory activity (e.g., cholesterol medications), or blood clotting
• Current antibiotic, antiviral, or antimicrobial treatment
• Shift workers
• Pregnancy
• Regular systematic mind-body practice (>2 times per week)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Basic Science
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness; Mindfulness intervention involving 14 foundational audio-guided lessons plus daily brief practice prompts. Lessons train meditation techniques for 3 mindfulness skills: concentration, sensory clarity, and equanimity. Practice prompts delivered 3x daily build on the skills trained in each lesson.	Behavioral: Mindfulness; The mindfulness intervention includes 14 daily 20-minute audio lessons plus brief daily practice prompts. Lessons train specific meditation techniques through didactic explanation and guided practice. Based on the Unified Mindfulness system, lessons train 3 mindfulness skills: concentration, sensory clarity, and equanimity. Concentration, a state of stable attention on the intended target, enables participants to monitor present-moment physical and emotional body experiences. Sensory clarity, the monitoring of momentary experiences, involves detecting subtle sensations and discriminating between different experiences. Equanimity, an attitude of acceptance toward momentary experiences, is trained through 3 strategies: (a) body relaxation, (b) mental welcoming, and (c) a gentle tone of voice. Practice prompts build on the skills trained in each lesson, encouraging participants to practice brief moments of mindful awareness, mindfulness while doing daily tasks, or formal meditation.
Active Comparator: Coping; Coping intervention involving 14 foundational audio-guided lessons plus daily brief practice prompts. Lessons train techniques for 3 coping skills: reflection, reappraisal, and problem solving. Practice prompts delivered 3x daily build on the skills trained in each lesson.	Behavioral: Coping; The coping intervention includes 14 daily 20-minute audio lessons plus brief daily practice prompts. Lessons train specific coping techniques through didactic explanation and guided practice. Lessons train coping skills (reflection, reappraisal, and problem solving) without encouraging focus on or acceptance of present experience (i.e., mindfulness skills). Participants are instructed to: (1) reflect and let their minds drift, (2) reframe or reappraise past and anticipated events, and (3) analyze and solve personal problems. Practice prompts build on the skills trained in each lesson, encouraging participants to take brief reflection breaks or to practice reappraisal or problem-solving skills.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Feasibility of Recruitment (Screened Eligible)	Recruitment benchmark: >10% of people screened will be eligible	assessed pre-enrollment
Feasibility of Retention	Retention benchmark: >80% retention through intervention and >75% retention through follow-up	assessed across the entire 8-week study period
Feasibility of Adherence: Intervention Lessons	Numbers represent percentages of intervention lessons completed in mindfulness and coping groups [calculated as (average number of lessons completed / 14 total lessons among all participants in each group) * 100]. The original adherence benchmark was an average completion of >85% of intervention lessons; reported percentages that are greater than that benchmark represent feasibility of intervention adherence.	assessed across the entire 2-week intervention period
Feasibility of Safe Implementation: Incidence of Treatment-emergent Increases in Mental Health Symptoms	Safety benchmark: <10% of participants showing substantial (>2SD) increases in anxiety, trauma, or depressive symptoms (using PROMIS Anxiety and Depression scales and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian scale described in other outcomes below) combined to create treatment-emergent symptom rate	assessed across the entire 8-week study period
Acceptability: Treatment Expectancies	Acceptability of interventions, with benchmark of >80% of participants giving positive ratings of treatment expectancies (>3 on 6-item Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire)	assessed in-person at post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Subjective Stress: State Perceived Stress	State perceived stress assessed in daily life four times per day for one week at three time points via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), totaling up to 28 assessments at each time point. All 28 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Stress was assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.	change in stress assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Subjective Stress: Daily Perceived Stress	Daily perceived stress assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of day diary, totaling up to 7 assessments at each time point. All 7 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Stress was assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.	change in stress assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Objective Stress: Stress Events in the Past 2.5 Hours	Stress events assessed on a binary scale (yes/no) in daily life four times per day for one week at three time points via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), totaling up to 28 assessments at each time point. All 28 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in logistic MLM analyses. Outcomes are reported as mean percentage of surveys at each time point that stress events were endorsed, with higher percentages indicating more stress events.	change in stress assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Objective Stress: Daily Stress Events	Daily stress events assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of day diary, totaling up to 7 assessments at each time point. All 7 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in logistic MLM analyses. Outcomes are reported as mean percentage of days at each time point that stress events were endorsed, with higher percentages indicating more stress events.	change in stress assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Physiological Stress Reactivity	Heart Rate (HR) measured continuously in daily life, with HR averaged in 30-minute windows around daily life stress reported via EMA up to four times per day for one week at three time points, totaling up to 28 windows at each time point. All (up to) 28 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher scores indicate higher HR in beats per minute (relative to an individual's average daily HR) at high stress moments (relative to an individual's average perceived stress).	change in HR reactivity assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Feasibility of Recruitment (Enrollment)	Recruitment benchmark: >60% of those eligible will enroll	assessed pre-enrollment
Feasibility of Adherence: Intervention Practice Prompts	Numbers represent percentages of intervention practice prompts completed in mindfulness and coping groups [calculated as (average number of prompts completed / 42 total prompts among all participants in each group) * 100]. The original adherence benchmark was an average completion of >60% of prompts; reported percentages that are greater than that benchmark represent feasibility of intervention practice prompt adherence.	assessed across the entire 2-week intervention period
Feasibility of Adherence: Ambulatory Assessments	Numbers represent percentages of ambulatory assessment surveys completed in mindfulness and coping groups [calculated as (average number of surveys completed / 105 total surveys among all participants in each group) * 100]. The original adherence benchmark was an average completion of >75% of ambulatory assessments; reported percentages that are greater than that benchmark represent feasibility of ambulatory assessment adherence.	assessed for 1 week at three time points: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Feasibility of Adherence: Mobile Sensor Data	Numbers represent percentages of days on which wearable sensor (Fitbit) data and AWARE phone sensor data were collected in mindfulness and coping groups [calculated as (average number of days that Fitbit/AWARE data were collected / 56 days among all participants in each group) * 100]. The original adherence benchmark was collecting mobile sensor data on >75% of days; reported percentages that are greater than that benchmark represent feasibility of mobile sensor data collection adherence.	assessed across the entire 8-week study period
Change in Circulating Inflammatory Markers	Circulating IL-6 assessed via dried blood spot (DBS), reported as raw concentration in pg/mL assessed via ProteinSimple Simple Plex Human IL-6 (3rd gen) on Ella instrument	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Daily Life Positive Affect: State	State positive affect assessed in daily life four times per day for one week at three time points via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), totaling up to 28 assessments at each time point. All 28 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Positive affect was assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher positive affect.	change in affect assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Positive Affect: Daily	Daily positive affect (composite of 9 positive affect items across 3 subscales: happiness (happy, pleased, and cheerful), calm (calm, at-ease, and relaxed), and vigor (lively, full-of-pep, and energetic), each assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale) assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of day diary, totaling up to 7 scores at each time point. All 7 composite scores at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher scores reflect higher positive affect.	change in affect assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Negative Affect: State	State negative affect assessed in daily life four times per day for one week at three time points via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), totaling up to 28 assessments at each time point. All 28 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Negative affect was assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher negative affect.	change in affect assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Negative Affect: Daily	Daily negative affect (composite of 9 negative affect items across 3 subscales: anxiety (on edge, nervous, and tense), depression (sad, depressed, and unhappy), and hostility (hostile, resentful, and angry), each assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale) assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of day diary, totaling up to 7 scores at each time point. All 7 composite scores at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher scores reflect higher negative affect.	change in affect assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Social Interactions: Interactions in the Past 2.5 Hours	Number of social interactions assessed in daily life four times per day for one week at three time points via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), totaling up to 28 assessments at each time point. All 28 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher numbers indicate more social interactions.	change in interactions assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Social Interactions: Daily	Number of social interactions assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of day diary, totaling up to 7 assessments at each time point. All 7 assessments at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher numbers indicate more social interactions.	change in interactions assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Mindfulness: Awareness	Mindful awareness (composite 3-item scale: "Today, I paid attention to what I was doing in the present moment" / "Today, I noticed body sensations come and go" / "Today, I noticed pleasant and unpleasant thoughts and emotions", each item assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale) assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of-day diary, totaling up to 7 scores at each time point. All 7 composite scores at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher composite scores reflect higher mindful awareness.	change in awareness assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)
Change in Daily Life Mindfulness: Acceptance	Mindful acceptance (composite 2-item scale: "Today, I was able to step back and be aware of distressing thoughts, emotions, and sensations, without being taken over by them" / "Today, I did not want to feel the way I was feeling", each item assessed on a 1-7 Likert scale) assessed in daily life each evening for one week at three time points via end-of-day diary, totaling up to 7 scores at each time point. All 7 composite scores at each of the three time points (pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment, and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment) were averaged in MLM analyses. Higher composite scores reflect higher acceptance.	change in acceptance assessed in daily life for 1 week at three timepoints: pre-intervention ambulatory assessment, post-intervention ambulatory assessment (an average of 3 weeks), and one-month follow-up ambulatory assessment (an average of 7 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Circulating Inflammatory Biomarkers: CRP	Circulating CRP assessed via dried blood spot (DBS) [additional funding needed to assess]	change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Circulating Inflammatory Biomarkers: TNF	Circulating TNF assessed via dried blood spot (DBS) [additional funding needed to assess]	change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Circulating Inflammatory Biomarkers: IL-8	Circulating IL-8 assessed via dried blood spot (DBS) [additional funding needed to assess]	change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Circulating Inflammatory Biomarkers: IL-10	Circulating IL-10 assessed via dried blood spot (DBS) [additional funding needed to assess]	change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up (an average of 8 weeks)
Passive Sensor Stress Models	Passive sensor data from smartphones (location, activity, screen status, battery, weather, time zone, communication) and wearable devices (heart rate, activity, sleep) combined to develop machine learning models predicting state stress	collected continuously for 8 weeks
Change in State Stress Following Intervention Practice	State stress following intervention practice used to evaluate immediate benefit of practice delivered at high-stress moments	change from pre- to post-practice across two-week intervention period
Daily Stress Following Intervention Practice	End-of-day stress on days with intervention practice used to evaluate day-level benefit of practice delivered at high-stress moments	daily stress across two-week intervention period
Early Life Adversity: Childhood Trauma	Assessed via the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (a 28-item scale with three 5-item abuse subscales - physical, sexual, and emotional abuse - ranging from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher childhood trauma)	pre-intervention
Early Life Adversity: Emotional Neglect	Early Life Adversity assessed via the Childhood Experiences of Care and Abuse Inventory (a 16-item scale referencing mother and father figures, with an 8-item emotional neglect subscale ranging from 8-40, where higher scores indicate higher levels of emotional neglect)	pre-intervention
Early Life Adversity: Childhood SES Indexed Via Parental Education	Childhood SES indexed via parental educational attainment, ranging from less than high school education to doctoral degree (1 = No High School Diploma, 2 = GED, 3 = High School Diploma, 4 = Technical Training, 5 = Some College, no degree, 6 = Associate Degree, 7 = Bachelor's Degree, 8 = Master's Degree, 9 = MD, PhD, JD, or PharmD), with higher scores indicating higher educational attainment	pre-intervention
Early Life Adversity: Childhood SES Indexed by Government Food Assistance	Childhood SES assessed via National Comorbidity Survey: Adolescents item assessing government food assistance	pre-intervention
Early Life Adversity: Domestic Violence	Early Life Adversity assessed via Adverse Childhood Experiences Survey (using a 5-item domestic violence subscale, ranging from 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher levels of domestic violence)	pre-intervention
Change in Global Psychosocial Stress: Anxiety	Assessed in-person via PROMIS Anxiety, a 4-item scale with raw scores ranging from 4-20 and converted to t-scores, with t-scores of 50 (standard deviation = 10) representing the average for the US general population and higher t-scores indicating higher anxiety	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Stress: Depressive Symptoms	Assessed in-person via PROMIS Depression, a 4-item scale with raw scores ranging from 4-20 and converted to t-scores, with t-scores of 50 (standard deviation = 10) representing the average for the US general population and higher t-scores indicating higher depressive symptoms	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Stress: Social Isolation	Assessed in-person via PROMIS Social Isolation, a 14-item scale with raw scores ranging from 14 to 70 and converted to t-scores, with t-scores of 50 (standard deviation = 10) representing the average for the US general population and higher t-scores indicating higher social isolation	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Stress: Perceived Stress	Assessed in-person via Perceived Stress Scale (a 10-item scale ranging from 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Stress: Trauma Symptoms	Assessed in-person via Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C), a 17-item scale ranging from 17-85, with higher scores indicating higher levels of trauma, and scores of 30 or greater indicating at least moderately severe PTSD symptoms	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Stress: Depersonalization	Assessed in-person via Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (a 29-item scale ranging from 0-116, assessing frequency and duration of depersonalization symptoms, with higher scores indicating greater depersonalization)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Sleep Quality	Assessed in-person via Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (6-item short form, ranging from 0-12, with higher scores indicating worse sleep)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Resilience: Life Satisfaction	Assessed in-person via PROMIS Life Satisfaction, a 5-item scale with raw scores ranging from 5-35 and converted to t-scores, with t-scores of 50 (standard deviation = 10) representing the average for the US general population and higher t-scores indicating higher life satisfaction	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Resilience: Positive Affect	Assessed in-person via PROMIS Positive Affect, a 15-item scale with raw scores ranging from 15-75 and converted to t-scores, with t-scores of 50 (standard deviation = 10) representing the average for the US general population and higher t-scores indicating higher positive affect	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Psychosocial Resilience: Self-Efficacy	Assessed in-person via PROMIS Self-Efficacy, a 4-item scale with raw scores ranging from 4-20 and converted to t-scores, with t-scores of 50 (standard deviation = 10) representing the average for the US general population and higher t-scores indicating higher self-efficacy	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Mindfulness	Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form (a 24-item scale including five subscales - observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonreactivity, and nonjudgment, with average scores ranging from 1-5 and higher scores indicating higher mindfulness)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Experiential Avoidance	Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (a 7-item scale ranging from 7-49, with higher scores indicating higher experiential avoidance)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Distress Tolerance	Distress Tolerance Scale (a 15-item scale ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher distress tolerance)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)
Change in Global Self-Compassion	Self-Compassion Scale (a 25-item scale ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher self-compassion)	change from pre-intervention laboratory assessment to post-intervention laboratory assessment (an average of 4 weeks) and one-month follow-up laboratory assessment (an average of 8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Pittsburgh
• Collaborators: National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Emily K Lindsay, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 1, 2022
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 22, 2024
• Study Completion (Actual): May 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 18, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 22, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): August 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 8, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 22, 2025
• Last Verified: July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: STUDY21030189; K01AT011232 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: All data sharing will follow NIH and Pitt IRB guidelines. To gain access to IPD that underlie results in a publication, anyone not part of the original research will submit a Data Analysis Request Form, which requires a description of hypotheses, specific data requested, and investigator information. The investigator must complete the Pitt Certification Program in Research Practice Fundamentals or a comparable program. Upon approval, a de-identified dataset and codebook will be provided. Investigators outside Pitt must also complete a Data Use and Confidentiality Agreement. This signed letter of agreement states that the investigator (1) will cite the original study dataset and funding source in all presentations and publications, and (2) will not share these data and study materials with others. Participants will be made aware of the potential for sharing of de-identified data with outside investigators on informed consent documents.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Upon request, data collected for this study will also be made available to other investigators following publication of primary findings.
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: Data Analysis Request Form; completion of the University of Pittsburgh Certification Program in Research Practice Fundamentals or a comparable training program at their own institution; Data Use and Confidentiality Agreement for investigators outside University of Pittsburgh
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL; ICF; ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No