Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVISAR)

May 16, 2026 updated by: Francesco Nappi, Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Operation for Aortic-Valve Stenosis in Patients at Risk to Severe Valve Obstruction.

The mechanical intervention is treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS) which may be performed using the standard open surgical approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The key question of this study is to establish the difference in all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow-up, left ventricular reverse remodeling after adjustment for death, as assessed by means of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), in patients who received the TAVI vs the standard surgical procedure for AVS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who have had TAVI or standard surgical procedure of their aortic valve with or without coronary artery by pass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, AVS, and heart failure (HF). Patients enrolled in the studies were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.

Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with TAVI, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of sutureless aortic valve.

we calculated that a total of 649 patients per group would be needed for 90% power to show an absolute between-groups difference of 10% in the primary outcome at a two-sided alpha level of 0.02 (corrected alpha level to take into account multiple comparison between 3 groups). In this exhaustive study between 2011 and 2021, we hope to include a total of 6700 patients (2800 in the TAVI group, 3200 patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and 700 patients with the use of sutureless aortic valve).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

4000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Denis, France, 93200
        • Francesco Nappi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with aortic valve stenosis with or without CAD who were symptomatic of congestive heart failure and unresponsive to medical therapy and who were eligible for mechanical intervention performed with the use of TAVI procedure or surgical aortic valve replacement. The severity of AVS was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, performed using the European Society of Echocardiography criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals enrolled in TAVI arm were required to have the predicted risk of operative mortality was ≥ 15% and/or a STS score of ≥ 10. A candidate who did not meet the STS score criteria of ≥ 10 was included in the study if a peer review by at least two surgeon investigators concluded and documented that the patient's predicted risk of operative mortality was ≥ 15%. For all group Senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiography derived criteria: mean gradient > 40 mm Hg or jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) of < 0.8 cm2 (or AVA index < 0.5 cm2/m2).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment (defined as Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation.

    • Blood dyscrasias as defined : leukopenia (WBC < 3000 mm3), acute anemia (Hb < 9 mg%), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm³), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
    • Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic therapy or mechanical hemodynamic support devices
    • Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
    • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction.
    • Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%.
    • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
    • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months.
    • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), or clopidogrel
    • (Plavix), or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
    • For TAVI arm Native aortic annulus size < 18mm or 25mm as measured by echocardiogram.
    • Subject was offered surgery but refused surgery.
    • Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack.
    • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0mg/dL) and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic
    • dialysis.
    • Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
    • For TAVI group significant abdominal or thoracic aorta disease, including aneurysm (defined as maximal luminal diameter 5 cm or greater), marked tortuosity, aortic arch atheroma, narrowing of the abdominal aorta with particular regard for calcification and surface irregularities, or severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta. This criteria were applicable for transfemoral patients only.
    • For TAVI group Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of 14F or 18F introducer
    • For TAVI arm sheath such as severe calcification, severe tortuosity or vessels size diameter < 7 mm for 22F
    • Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections.
    • For TAVI arm bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who received TAVI with or without CABG or PCI. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease, LV dysfunction, aortic valve stenosis, and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.
Patients who are deemed receive TAVI first underwent evaluation of their peripheral arteries before the procedure, in order to separate those eligible for transfemoral placement (TFP) from those who would require transapical placement. Technological advances achieved in the new platforms for the treatment of SHD have allowed the use of reduced size catheters and sheaths in the new armamentarium, favoring the TFP technique. The transcatheter valve (TV) is positioned at the level of the native aortic valve during the final step of valve replacement, when the balloon is inflated within the native valve during a brief period of rapid ventricular pacing. The delivery system i traverses the aorta retrograde over a guidewire from its point of insertion in the femoral artery during the use of TFP. Before balloon inflation, the valve and balloon are collapsed on the catheter and fit within the sheath. After balloon inflation, the calcified native valve is replaced by the expanded TV
Other Names:
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repacement
The bioprosthesis is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other Names:
  • SAVR
The sutureless is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other Names:
  • SAVR
Bioprosthesis
Patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who undervent SAVR with the use of bioprosthesis with or without CABG or PCI. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease, LV dysfunction, aortic valve stenosis, and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.
Patients who are deemed receive TAVI first underwent evaluation of their peripheral arteries before the procedure, in order to separate those eligible for transfemoral placement (TFP) from those who would require transapical placement. Technological advances achieved in the new platforms for the treatment of SHD have allowed the use of reduced size catheters and sheaths in the new armamentarium, favoring the TFP technique. The transcatheter valve (TV) is positioned at the level of the native aortic valve during the final step of valve replacement, when the balloon is inflated within the native valve during a brief period of rapid ventricular pacing. The delivery system i traverses the aorta retrograde over a guidewire from its point of insertion in the femoral artery during the use of TFP. Before balloon inflation, the valve and balloon are collapsed on the catheter and fit within the sheath. After balloon inflation, the calcified native valve is replaced by the expanded TV
Other Names:
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repacement
The bioprosthesis is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other Names:
  • SAVR
The sutureless is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other Names:
  • SAVR
Sutureless
Patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who were managed by mean of SAVR with the use of sutureless with or without CABG or PCI. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease, LV dysfunction, aortic valve stenosis, and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.
Patients who are deemed receive TAVI first underwent evaluation of their peripheral arteries before the procedure, in order to separate those eligible for transfemoral placement (TFP) from those who would require transapical placement. Technological advances achieved in the new platforms for the treatment of SHD have allowed the use of reduced size catheters and sheaths in the new armamentarium, favoring the TFP technique. The transcatheter valve (TV) is positioned at the level of the native aortic valve during the final step of valve replacement, when the balloon is inflated within the native valve during a brief period of rapid ventricular pacing. The delivery system i traverses the aorta retrograde over a guidewire from its point of insertion in the femoral artery during the use of TFP. Before balloon inflation, the valve and balloon are collapsed on the catheter and fit within the sheath. After balloon inflation, the calcified native valve is replaced by the expanded TV
Other Names:
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repacement
The bioprosthesis is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other Names:
  • SAVR
The sutureless is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other Names:
  • SAVR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment failure
Time Frame: 5 years
The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation
5 years
Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (HF)
Time Frame: 5 yeras
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of hospedalization rates for heart failure valve due to structural/ non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis
5 yeras

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of overall mortality
5 years
Cardiac Death
Time Frame: 5 years
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of cardiac death
5 years
Non Cardiac Death
Time Frame: 5 years
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of non cardiac death
5 years
Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)
Time Frame: 5 years
Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (rate of death, stroke, subsequent mitral valve surgery, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in New York Heart Association class higher than one), serious adverse events, recurrent aortic regurgitation, quality of life, and rehospitalization
5 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEF)
Time Frame: 5 years
Changes from baseline parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction
5 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes ( AVR recurrence)
Time Frame: 5 years
Recurrent moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after intervention
5 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEDD/LVEDV)
Time Frame: 5 years
Changes from baseline Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter or Volume
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Nappi, Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prosthesis Survival

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Subscribe