Registry on Percutaneous Electrochemotherapy (RESPECT)

The Registry on Percutaneous ElectroChemoTherapy (RESPECT) is a post-market, prospective, non-randomized, observational study aiming at evaluating the effectiveness of percutaneous electrochemotherapy (ECT) for the treatment of liver cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a local tumour ablation technique that uses reversible electroporation to transiently permeabilize the cell membrane in order to increase the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. A major advantage of ECT is that its antitumour efficacy is driven by the chemotherapeutic agent which predominantly targets rapidly-dividing tumour cells, with very little collateral damage on neighbouring structures.

ECT is typically performed using the CLINIPORATOR®, a medical grade pulse generator for clinical electroporation, whose development was funded by the European Commission in an effort to standardize the operating procedures for ECT. The feasibility, safety and efficacy of ECT with the CLINIPORATOR® have been consistently reported for the management of different types of primary and secondary liver cancers: colorectal liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, portal vein tumour thrombosis from hepatocellular carcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastasis from renal cancer.

While ECT for liver malignancies has been mostly performed intraoperatively, recent studies have successfully used a percutaneous approach. These studies, which were either single-case reports or involved a very limited number of patients (< 10), have introduced percutaneous ECT as a very promising minimally invasive treatment option for liver cancer, with the obvious benefits of fewer surgical complications, faster recovery and shorter hospitalization. However, results from a larger and more diverse patient population are needed in order to confirm its therapeutic efficacy.

The aim of the RESPECT study is to expand our understanding of percutaneous ECT for primary and secondary liver cancer by 1) substantiating the evidence base for the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous ECT in a large-scale, multi-centric, cross-border sample; and 2) extending the current evidence base regarding percutaneous ECT with appropriately defined follow-up data, as well as information regarding quality of life.

RESPECT is a post-market, prospective, non-randomized, observational study. Patients with any type of liver cancer will be given the possibility to enrol after they are referred to percutaneous ECT by a multidisciplinary tumour board, hence participation to the registry neither affects treatment plan nor influence treatment quality. Patient enrolment will last 3 years, with a follow-up period of 1 year. Data will be collected less than 1 week before treatment (baseline) and at different intervals following treatment (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and every 6 months until the end of the study). Effectiveness of ECT will be primarily assessed by the status of each treated lesion 12 months after treatment. Overall survival, overall local disease-free survival, hepatic disease-free survival, time to untreatable progression by ECT and vacation from systemic cancer therapy will give further insight into the impact of ECT. Safety will be evaluated based on the occurrence and severity of adverse events associated with the treatment. Quality of life and pain will be documented using questionnaires filled by the patients at the first 3 to 4 follow-ups.

Overall, RESPECT intends to provide healthcare professionals and health authorities with information on percutaneous ECT for liver cancer to help decision-making regarding treatment access and treatment modalities and optimize patient care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
      • Paris, France
        • Institut Gustave Roussy
      • Bonn, Germany
        • WEGE Klinik
      • Braunschweig, Germany
        • Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig
      • Halle, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Halle
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • Helios Park-Klinikum
      • Regensburg, Germany
        • University Hospital Regensburg
      • Szeged, Hungary
        • University of Szeged
      • Milan, Italy
        • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
      • Rome, Italy
        • Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli
      • Rome, Italy
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
      • Vilnius, Lithuania
        • Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Y Politecnico La Fe
      • Leeds, United Kingdom
        • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with primary or secondary liver cancer referred to local ablative treatment by multidisciplinary tumour board and treated with pECT by decision of the interventional radiologist in charge.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Primary or secondary liver cancer
  • Referral to local ablative treatment by multidisciplinary tumour board and decision to treat with pECT by interventional radiologist in charge
  • Planned treatment with pECT using the CLINIPORATOR
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Tumour Control
Time Frame: 12 months
Based on the tumour status according to mRECIST assessment
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety (in terms of adverse events related to treatment)
Time Frame: 12 months
Based on the occurrence of adverse events and their severity according to CTCAE v5.0
12 months
Tumour status (size)
Time Frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)
Based on tumour size
End of study (maximum 36 months)
Tumour status (mRECIST)
Time Frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)
Based on mRECIST assessment
End of study (maximum 36 months)
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: 3 months

Based on the Quality of Life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 filled by the patients before ECT treatment and at different time intervals following ECT treatment.

Quality of life data is measured according to three scales: functional scale, symptom scale and global health. On the functional scale, scores range from 1 to 4, with a score of 1 corresponding to no at all and a score of 4 corresponding to very much. On the symptom scale, scores range from 1 to 4, with a score of 1 corresponding to no at all and a score of 4 corresponding to very much.

For global health, the scores range from 1 to 7, with a score of 1 corresponding to either very poor global health or very poor quality of life, and a score of 7 corresponding to either excellent global health or excellent quality of life.

3 months
Pain assessment
Time Frame: 1 month

Based on the pain questionnaire filled by the patients before ECT treatment and at different time intervals following ECT treatment.

Severity of pain is graded on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 corresponding to the most severe pain. Pain frequency is graded from 0 (no pain) to 4 (chronic pain persistent for more than 3 months). Quality of pain is classified into 4 categories: no, somatic, visceral and neuropathic pain.

1 month
Effectiveness (Survival)
Time Frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)
Survival will be categorized with respect to overall survival, overall local disease-free survival and hepatic disease-free survival
End of study (maximum 36 months)
Effectiveness (Time to untreatable progression by ECT)
Time Frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)
Based on the timeframe until the progressing tumour is not treatable by ECT anymore
End of study (maximum 36 months)
Systemic cancer therapy vacation
Time Frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)
Based on the time frame following ECT treatment during which patients do not need systemic cancer therapy
End of study (maximum 36 months)
Economic aspects
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Based on the duration of hospitalization following ECT treatment
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Philipp Wiggermann, Prof. Dr., Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
  • Study Chair: Attila Kovács, PD. Dr. med., WEGE Klinik, Bonn, Germany
  • Study Chair: Franco Orsi, Prof., European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe