Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Assessments in Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (CMD-MINOCA)

May 8, 2026 updated by: Young Joon Hong, Chonnam National University Hospital

Clinical Relevance of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Assessments in Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

To compare clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) according to the coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT), invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Approximately 5~10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been reported as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in the contemporary clinical setting. Although those with MINOCA have a better prognosis than with obstructive coronary artery disease, several observational studies continuously reported that patients with MINOCA showed comparable outcomes. One plausible explanation of this discrepancy is the heterogeneous and variable definition of MINOCA. Possible causes of MINOCA include plaque erosion and/or rupture, vasospasm, and CMD. Therefore, it is natural that heterogeneous pathophysiology of MINOCA causes diagnostic challenges and proper management.

Recently, there have been efforts for establishing the diagnosis of MINOCA and standardizing the systematic management according to the cause of MINOCA. According to the AHA scientific statement, patients who suspected MINOCA have been recommended to perform multimodality approach, including intravascular imaging (i.e., OCT). Although non-invasive methods, such as N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET), can be used for evaluating the CMD, invasive coronary physiologic assessment using pressure-temperature wire has been recommended. CMD has been known as a major cause of MINOCA, and it may be required specific treatment.

Nevertheless, there has no data on the outcomes of MINOCA with or without CMD. Therefore, the aim of CMD-MINOCA sought to assess the MINOCA patients regarding the latest clinical pathway for diagnosis of CMD and evaluate their clinical outcomes at 2 years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Seung Hun Lee, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 82-10-6413-7449
  • Email: lsh8602@naver.com

Study Locations

    • Gwangju
      • Gwangju, Gwangju, South Korea, 61469
        • Recruiting
        • Chonnam National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Seung Hun Lee, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Young Joon Hong, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

About 150 patients with suspected myocardial infarction underwent invasive coronary angiography, but without obstructive coronary arteries will be enrolled. These patients will be evaluated by OCT, coronary functional assessment including coronary spasm test, invasive (FFR, CFR, IMR) and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with age ≥19 years and acute myocardial infarction

    • Rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin with one level >99 percentile plus ischemic signs/symptoms

      • Subject with non-obstructive coronary arteries
    • <50% diameter stenosis or
    • fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.80 ③ Subject without previous history of coronary artery disease

      • Subject who performed invasive coronary angiography within 24 hours after presentation ⑤ Subject who eligible for invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with obstructive coronary arteries

    • Subject with alternate diagnosis including sepsis, pulmonary embolism, myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, spontaneous coronary dissection, and other cardiomyopathies.

      • Subject with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest ④ Subject who has non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy <1 year ⑤ Subject or lactating women ⑥ Subject unable to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MINOCA with CMD
MINOCA patients with CMD proven by invasive or non-invasive method
Intravascular imaging (OCT), Invasive physiologic assessment (FFR, CFR, IMR), or Non-invasive physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia PET)
MINOCA without CMD
MINOCA patients without CMD
Intravascular imaging (OCT), Invasive physiologic assessment (FFR, CFR, IMR), or Non-invasive physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia PET)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACCE
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
a composite of cardiac death, any MI, any revascularization, stroke, readmission due to heart failure
2-Year after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cardiac death
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
death from cardiac-cause
2-Year after enrollment
all-cause death
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
death from any-cause
2-Year after enrollment
Rate of myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
any type of myocardial infarction
2-Year after enrollment
Rate of repeat revascularization
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
ischemia-driven or all
2-Year after enrollment
Rate of stroke
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke by brain imaging
2-Year after enrollment
re-admission due to heart failure
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
re-admission due to heart failure
2-Year after enrollment
all-cause death, any MI, or any revascularization
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization
2-Year after enrollment
Changes of left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment
left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography
2-Year after enrollment
Changes of Coronary flow reserve
Time Frame: 6-Month after enrollment
Coronary flow reserve by PET
6-Month after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young Joon Hong, MD, PhD, Chonnam National University Medical School; Chonnam National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the publication of the main paper, we have a plan to share IPD regarding the request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

December 31, 2026 ~

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Not specified. To be discussed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Intravascular imaging (OCT), Invasive physiologic assessment (FFR, CFR, IMR), or Non-invasive physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia PET)

Subscribe